HayesD.F., BastR.C., DeschC.E.. Tumor marker utility grading system: a framework to evaluate clinical utility of tumor markers. J Natl Cancer Inst1996; 88: 1456–66.
2.
HayesD.F., TrockB., HarrisA.L.Assessing the clinical impact of prognostic factors: when is “statistically significant” clinically useful?Breast Cancer Res Treat1998; 52: 305–19.
3.
AltmanD.G.Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables. BMJ2001; 323: 224–8.
4.
GionM., BoracchiP., BiganzoliE., DaidoneM.G.A guide for reviewing submitted manuscripts (and indications for the design of translational research studies on biomarkers). Int J Biol Markers1999; 14: 123–33.
5.
AltmanD.G., LausenB., SauerbreiW., SchumacherM.Dangers of using “optimal” cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors. J Natl Cancer Inst1994; 86: 829–35.
6.
SargentD., AllegraC.Issues in clinical trial design for tumor marker studies. Semin Oncol2002; 29: 222–30.
7.
GaleaM.H., BlameyR.W., ElstonC.E., EllisI.O.The Nottingham Prognostic Index in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat1992; 22: 207–19.
8.
CookeT., ReevesJ., LanniganA., StantonP.The value of the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) as a prognostic marker. Eur J Cancer2001; 37(Suppl 1): 3–10.
9.
CoradiniD., BoracchiP., DaidoneM.G.. Contribution of vascular endothelial growth factor to the Nottingham prognostic index in node-negative breast cancer. Br J Cancer2001; 85: 795–7.
10.
HansenS., GrabauD.A., SorensenF.B., BakM., VachW., RoseC.Vascular grading of angiogenesis: prognostic significance in breast cancer. Br J Cancer2000; 82: 339–47.
11.
HayesD.F., ThorA.D.c-erbB-2 in breast cancer: development of a clinically useful marker. Semin Oncol2002; 29: 231–45.
12.
GoldhirschA., GlickJ.H., GelberR.D., CoatesA.S., SennH-J. Meeting highlights: International consensus panel on the treatment of primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol2001; 19: 3817–27.
13.
MansourE.G., GrayR., ShatilaA.H.. Survival advantage of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk node-negative breast cancer: ten-year analysis - an intergroup study. J Clin Oncol1998; 16: 3486–92.
14.
HarbeckN., KatesR.E., SchmittM.Clinical relevance of invasion factors urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 for individualized therapy decisions in primary breast cancer is greatest when used in combination. J Clin Oncol2002; 20: 1000–7.
15.
LockwoodC.A., RicciardelliC., RaymondW.A., SeshadriR., McCaulK., HorsfallD.J.A simple index using video image analysis to predict disease outcome in primary breast cancer. Int J Cancer1999; 84: 203–8.
16.
AltmanD.G., RoystonP.What do we mean by validating a prognostic model?Stat Med2000; 19: 453–73.
17.
RavdinP.M.Is Her2 of value in identifying patients who particularly benefit from anthracyclines during adjuvant therapy? A qualified yes. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr2001; 80–4.
18.
SledgeG.W.Jr.. Is HER-2/neu a predictor of anthracycline utility?No. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr2001; 85–7.
19.
VogelC.L., CobleighM.A., TripathyD.. Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol2002; 20: 719–26.
20.
EiermannW.Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: pivotal trial data. Ann Oncol2001; 12: 57–62.
21.
SlamonD.J., Leyland-JonesB., ShakS.. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med2001; 344: 783–92.
22.
AmadoriD., NanniO., MarangoloM.. Disease-free survival advantage of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in patients with node-negative, rapidly proliferating breast cancer: a randomized multicenter study. J Clin Oncol2000; 18: 3125–34.
23.
ParadisoA., SchittulliF., CellamareG.. Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for patients with fast-proliferating, node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol2001; 19: 3929–37.
24.
JanickeF., PrechtlA., ThomssenC.. Randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trial in high-risk, lymph node-negative breast cancer patients identified by urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1. J Natl Cancer Inst2001; 93: 913–20.