Abstract
This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of BTA-TRAK in combination with urinary cytology (UC) in the follow-up of patients with a history of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder. The overall sensitivity of BTA-TRAK, UC and the two tests combined for the detection of recurrences was 82.7% (48/58), 84.2% (48/57) and 91.2% (52/57), respectively. BTA and UC showed comparable sensitivity for superficial recurrences (76.7% (33/43) and 78.5% (33/42), respectively) and for invasive recurrences (100% (15/15)); when the two tests were used in combination, the sensitivity for superficial lesions increased to 88% (37/42). BTA-TRAK was more sensitive than UC for G1 recurrences (81.2% (13/16) vs. 68.7% (11/16)), and when the two tests were combined the sensitivity increased to 87.5% (14/16). The sensitivity of the combination was 100% (15/15) for G3 lesions. The differences in urinary BTA-TRAK levels between patients with recurrences and those without evidence of disease were statistically significant (Wilcoxon's test, p<0.05); among patients with recurrences BTA levels were significantly higher in the invasive and poorly differentiated subtypes. In the series of patients studied by us, BTA-TRAK combined with UC was shown to be a non-invasive, accurate test to predict TCC recurrences. Periodic measurement of BTA-TRAK combined with urinary cytology seems to provide additional information for the monitoring of patients treated for TCC; however, due to the presence of false positive and false negative results, this test cannot replace cystoscopy. In a selected group of patients it could, if combined with cytology and ultrasonography and if correctly used and interpreted, orient the timing and indication for cystoscopy.