AlldredDP. Deprescribing: a brave new word?Int J Pharm Pract2014;22(1):2-3.
2.
WallisKAAndrewsAHendersonM. Swimming against the tide: primary care physicians’ views on deprescribing in everyday practice. Ann Fam Med2017;15(4):341-6.
3.
TannenbaumCFarrellBShawJet al. An ecological approach to reducing potentially inappropriate medication use: Canadian Deprescribing Network. Can J Aging2017;36(1):97-107.
4.
ReeveEThompsonWFarrellB. Deprescribing: a narrative review of the evidence and practical recommendations for recognizing opportunities and taking action. Eur J Intern Med2017;38:3-11.
5.
FarrellBPottieKRojas-FernandezCHet al. Methodology for developing deprescribing guidelines: using evidence and GRADE to guide recommendations for deprescribing. PLoS One2016;11(8):e0161248.
6.
LevinsonWHuynhT. Engaging physicians and patients in conversations about unnecessary tests and procedures: Choosing Wisely Canada. CMAJ2014;186(5):325-6.
7.
CasselCKGuestJA. Choosing Wisely: helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care. JAMA2012;307(17):1801-2.
8.
ReeveEGnjidicDLongJHilmerS. A systematic review of the emerging definition of ‘deprescribing’ with network analysis: implications for future research and clinical practice. Br J Clin Pharmacol2015;80(6):1254-68.
9.
ScottIAHilmerSNReeveEet al. Reducing inappropriate polypharmacy: the process of deprescribing. JAMA Intern Med2015;175(5):827-34.
10.
ScottIALe CouteurDG. Physicians need to take the lead in deprescribing. Intern Med J2015;45(3):352-6.
11.
AilabouniNJNishtalaPSManginDTordoffJM. Challenges and enablers of deprescribing: a general practitioner perspective. PLoS One2016;11(4):e0151066.
12.
AndersonKStowasserDFreemanCScottI. Prescriber barriers and enablers to minimising potentially inappropriate medications in adults: a systematic review and thematic synthesis. BMJ Open2014;4(12):e006544.
13.
HarrimanKHowardLMcCrackenR. Deprescribing medication for frail elderly patients in nursing homes: a survey of Vancouver family physicians. BC Med J2014;56(9):436-41.
14.
ReeveEToJHendrixIShakibSRobertsMSWieseMD. Patient barriers to and enablers of deprescribing: a systematic review. Drugs Aging2013;30(10):793-807.
15.
National Association of Pharmacy Regulatory Authorities Board of Directors. Professional competencies for canadian pharmacists at entry to practice. Ottawa (Canada): National Association of Pharmacy Regulatory Authorities; 2014. p. ii-25.
Government of Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Pharmaceutical opinion program. Ontario (Canada)Queen’s Printer for Ontario; 2009. Available: www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/drugs/pharmaopinion/ (accessed Sep. 8, 2015).
GreenJThorogoodN. Qualitative methodology and health research. In: Qualitative methods for health research. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2009. p. 3-34.
20.
KahlkeRM. Generic qualitative approaches: pitfalls and benefits of methodological mixology. Int J Qual Methods2014;13:37-52.
21.
ThorneSKirkhamSRMacDonald-EmesJ. Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Res Nurs Health1997;20(2):169-77.
22.
ThorneSKirkhamSRO’Flynn-MageeK. The analytic challenge in interpretive description. Int J Qual Methods2004;3(1):1-11.
23.
HuntMR. Strengths and challenges in the use of interpretive description: reflections arising from a study of the moral experience of health professionals in humanitarian work. Qual Health Res2009;19(9):1284-92.
24.
PattonMQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2002.
25.
TracyS. Qualitative quality: eight “big-tent”criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq2010;16(10):837-51.
MichieSvan StralenMMWestR. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci2011;6:42.
28.
O’ReillyMParkerN. ‘Unsatisfactory saturation’: a critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qual Res2013;13(2):190-7.
29.
GuestGBunceAJohnsonL. How many interviews are enough?Field Methods2006;18(1):59-82.
30.
BraunVClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol2006;3:77-101.
31.
FinlayL. “Outing” the researcher: the provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qual Health Res2002;12(4):531-45.
32.
EakinJMMykhalovskiyE. Reframing the evaluation of qualitative health research: reflections on a review of appraisal guidelines in the health sciences. J Eval Clin Pract2003;9(2):187-94.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.