Abstracts:Background: Hair dye-related allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a common problem among both consumers and professionals. The main sensitizers are aromatic amines such as para-phenylenediamine (PPD) and toluene-2,5-diamine (TDA), which can also cross-react with chemically related compounds.
Objective: To analyze patch-test results from patients with suspected hair dye-related ACD, focusing on the prevalence of sensitization to hair dye allergens, cross-reactivity patterns, and occupational differences.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 666 patients patch-tested between 2005 and 2023 at the Patch Test Clinic of Andreas Sygros Hospital, Athens, Greece. All patients were tested with the European baseline and extended hairdresser series. Results were evaluated according to the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group and European Society of Contact Dermatitis criteria. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for co-sensitization, adjusted for sex and age.
Results: Overall, 82.4% of patients reacted to at least 1 allergen, with a median of 3 positive reactions. PPD was the most frequent allergen (47.9%), followed by TDA (35.9%) and nickel (41.1%). Significant co-sensitization was observed between PPD and several chemically related compounds, including 4-aminophenol, 3-aminophenol, benzocaine, textile dyes, hydroquinone, and pyrogallol (P < 0.001). Similar associations were observed for TDA. Hairdressers were younger (mean 32.2 vs 40.7 years, P < 0.001) and had predominantly hand dermatitis (62.9%). Patients reacting to multiple hair dye components were significantly more likely to be sensitized to PPD. Co-sensitization between PPD and cocamidopropyl betaine likely reflected cosmetic co-exposure rather than structural cross-reactivity.
Conclusions: PPD and TDA remain the dominant sensitizers in hair dye-related ACD, with strong cross-reactivity to aminophenols, benzocaine, and textile dyes. Extended patch testing is essential for accurate diagnosis, as 7% of para-amino–compound–sensitized patients would be missed by PPD testing alone. Occupational exposure and multi-allergen sensitization highlight the need for safer formulations and preventive strategies in hair dye use.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
UterW, LessmannH, GeierJ, et al.Contact allergy to ingredients of hair cosmetics in female hairdressers and clients–an 8-year analysis of IVDK data. Contact Dermatitis. 2003; 49(5):236–240; doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.0233.x
2.
HamannD, KishiP, HamannCR. Consumer hair dye kits frequently contain isothiazolinones, other common preservatives and fragrance allergens. Dermatitis. 2018; 29(1):48–49; doi: 10.1097/der.0000000000000331
3.
McFaddenJP, YeoL, WhiteJL. Clinical and experimental aspects of allergic contact dermatitis to para-phenylenediamine. Clin Dermatol. 2011; 29(3):316–324; doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2010.11.011
LaBergeL, PrattM, FongB, et al.A 10-year review of p-phenylenediamine allergy and related para-amino compounds at the Ottawa Patch Test Clinic. Dermatitis. 2011; 22(6):332–334; doi: 10.2310/6620.2011.11044
7.
Encabo DuránB, Romero-PérezD, Silvestre SalvadorJF. Allergic contact dermatitis due to paraphenylenediamine: An update. Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed). 2018; 109(7):602–609; doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2017.12.007
8.
ThomasBR, WhiteIR, McFaddenJP, et al.Positive relationship-intensity of response to p-phenylenediamine on patch testing and cross-reactions with related allergens. Contact Dermatitis. 2014; 71(2):98–101; doi: 10.1111/cod.12255
9.
SøstedH, RustemeyerT, GonçaloM, et al.Contact allergy to common ingredients in hair dyes. Contact Dermatitis. 2013; 69(1):32–39; doi: 10.1111/cod.12077
10.
UterW, HallmannS, GefellerO, et al.Contact allergy to ingredients of hair cosmetics in female hairdressers and female consumers-An update based on IVDK data 2013-2020. Contact Dermatitis. 2023; 89(3):161–170; doi: 10.1111/cod.14363
11.
UterW, AndersenKE, BransR, et al.; EECDRG. The “MOAHLFA(P) Index”: An attempt to standardise a widely used array of descriptors of patch-tested patients. Contact Dermatitis. 2025; 92(4):251–260; doi: 10.1111/cod.14750
12.
GregoriouS, MastraftsiS, HatzidimitriouE, et al.Occupational and non-occupational allergic contact dermatitis to hair dyes in Greece. A 10-year retrospective study. Contact Dermatitis. 2020; 83(4):277–285; doi: 10.1111/cod.13598
13.
UterW, GefellerO, JohnSM, et al.Contact allergy to ingredients of hair cosmetics - A comparison of female hairdressers and clients based on IVDK 2007-2012 data. Contact Dermatitis. 2014; 71(1):13–20; doi: 10.1111/cod.12196
14.
ItoA, NishiokaK, KantoH, et al.A multi-institutional joint study of contact dermatitis related to hair colouring and perming agents in Japan. Contact Dermatitis. 2017; 77(1):42–48; doi: 10.1111/cod.12783
15.
WarshawEM, PetersonMY, AtwaterAR, et al.Patch testing to paraphenylenediamine: The North American Contact Dermatitis Group experience (1994-2018). Dermatitis. 2023; 34(6):536–546; doi: 10.1089/derm.2023.0140
16.
TsimpidakisA, KatoulisA, NicolaidouE, et al.Hair dyes sensitization and cross-reactions: Challenges and solutions: A systematic review of Hair Dye Allergens’ prevalence. Dermatitis. 2024; 35(1):13–23; doi: 10.1089/derm.2023.0019
17.
ThyssenJP, WhiteJM, Dermatitis ES of C. Epidemiological data on consumer allergy to p-phenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis. 2008; 59(6):327–343; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01427.x
18.
DiepgenTL, NaldiL, BruzeM, et al.Prevalence of contact allergy to p-phenylenediamine in the European general population. J Invest Dermatol. 2016; 136(2):409–415; doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2015.10.064
19.
VogelTA, HeijnenRW, CoenraadsPJ, et al.Two decades of p-phenylenediamine and toluene-2,5-diamine patch testing - Focus on co-sensitizations in the European baseline series and cross-reactions with chemically related substances. Contact Dermatitis. 2017; 76(2):81–88; doi: 10.1111/cod.12619
