Abstract
Background
Aortic diseases, including aneurysms and dissections, represent a significant global health burden, necessitating advancements in surgical and endovascular interventions. This bibliometric analysis examines the evolution of research trends, key contributors, and emerging themes in the treatment of aortic diseases over the past three decades.
Methods
Bibliometric data from Scopus and Web of Science databases were analyzed for peer-reviewed articles published between 1994 and 2024. A systematic approach adhering to the PRISMA 2020 framework identified 2985 articles. Descriptive and advanced bibliometric techniques, including citation, co-authorship, and keyword co-occurrence analyses, were employed using tools such as VOSviewer and Biblioshiny.
Results
The annual scientific output demonstrated consistent growth, with significant contributions from the United States, United Kingdom, and Germany. Leading institutions, including Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, played pivotal roles in advancing research. Keywords revealed a dual focus on minimally invasive techniques, such as EVAR and TEVAR, and patient-centered outcomes like quality of life and survival. Collaboration networks and citation analyses highlighted influential authors and foundational studies shaping the field.
Conclusions
The study underscores the importance of global collaboration and technological innovation in advancing aortic disease treatment. While disparities in research representation persist, emerging trends in hybrid approaches, multidisciplinary methods, and outcome-based studies offer promising directions for future research. These findings provide a comprehensive resource for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers seeking to address challenges and improve patient care in this critical field.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
