Abstract
Objective
Combined iliofemoral endarterectomy and iliac stenting (IFE + S) is a proven surgical approach for TransAtlantic Inter-society Consensus (TASC) C and D aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Iliac stenting alone (ISA) may be an attractive, minimally invasive option in select cases; however, untreated moderate-to-severe common femoral disease may threaten iliac stent patency and limit symptom improvement. This study evaluates the mid-term patency rates after IFE + S versus ISA for TASC C and D AIOD as well as the rate of interval femoral endarterectomies in those who underwent ISA.
Methods
This is a retrospective, single-center analysis of patients from 2011 to 2018 with TASC C or D AIOD and concomitant femoral artery stenosis of >50% who underwent IFE + S or ISA. Baseline lesion and patient characteristics such as TASC classification, degree of stenosis, calcification severity, lesion length, and baseline ankle-brachial index (ABI) were collected. Primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates were calculated over three years with Kaplan-Meier estimates. The rate of interval femoral endarterectomies in the ISA cohort was measured at the same time endpoint.
Results
Of the 78 limbs identified, 64 (82.1%) underwent IFE + S and 14 (17.9%) underwent ISA. No significant differences in aortoiliac or femoral lesion characteristics existed. Iliac stent primary patency was significantly improved in the IFE + S group at three years [85.1% versus 55.6%, HR 3.96 (95% CI 1.54, 10.2, p = .004)]. Primary-assisted and secondary patency rates were not significantly different. Five (35.7%) patients in the ISA cohort required an interval femoral endarterectomy for ischemic symptoms over the three-year endpoint.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
