Hostile neck anatomy contributes to higher rates of reintervention following endovascular aortic repair for ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm

Abstract

Introduction

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) presenting with hostile neck anatomy can represent a challenge in surgical decision-making. We hypothesized that, patients who require reinterventions have higher rates of compromised neck anatomy at initial presentation and may indicate a need for altered surveillance paradigm.

Methods

Patients presenting with ruptured AAA to a single tertiary care institution from 2014 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Those treated with infrarenal EVAR, with no prior aortic surgeries, and with available pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scans were included. Demographics, timing and type of reintervention, follow-up, and survival were collected. CT scans were assessed for hostile neck anatomy via measurements of diameter, length, angle, taper, bulge, calcification, and thrombus. Demographics, comorbidities, and neck anatomy of those with and without reintervention were compared using Fischer’s Exact and Student’s T-test. Survival was analyzed via Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test.

Results

Eighty-nine patients were available for analysis, 37 of which met inclusion criteria. Intraoperative death occurred in 3 patients (8.1%) and 1 patient (2.7%) was intraoperatively converted to an open repair. Thirty-day and 1-year survival were 97% and 91%, respectively. The reintervention rate was 30% (n = 10), occurring at a median of 200 days (18–2053 days) after the index operation. All patients requiring reintervention met hostile neck criteria (p = .002) and had a statistically higher number of hostile neck criteria (1.80 vs 0.87, p = .03). Thirty percent (n = 3) of patients that received a reintervention had neck diameter greater than 3 cm, compared to zero patients in the non-reintervention group (p = .022). Proximal reinterventions (n = 5) had statistically higher neck diameters and neck angle compared to the non-reintervention group.

Conclusion

Infrarenal rEVAR is effective at preventing acute mortality despite specific anatomic considerations that may contribute to the higher reintervention rates, and therefore those parameters ought to be considered when following patients in the post-intervention period.

Keywords

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular aortic repair reintervention

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fairman

Beck

Malas

, et al. Reinterventions in the modern era of thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg 2020; 71(2): 408–422. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.484.

Powell

Sweeting

Ulug

Thompson

Hinchliffe

, et al. Editor’s choice – re-interventions after repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a report from the IMPROVE randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2018; 55(5): 625–632. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.01.028.

Roos

Djerf

Brisby Jeppsson

, et al. Re-interventions after endovascular aortic repair for infrarenal abdominal aneurysms: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2016; 16(1): 124. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-016-0309-0.

Columbo

Martinez-Camblor

O’Malley

, et al. Long-term reintervention after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Surg 2021; 274(1): 179–185. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003446.

Columbo

Ramkumar

Martinez-Camblor

, et al. Five-year reintervention after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the vascular quality initiative. J Vasc Surg 2020; 71(3): 799–805. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.05.057.

Dillavou

Muluk

Rhee

, et al.

Does hostile neck anatomy preclude successful endovascular aortic aneurysm repair?

J Vasc Surg 2003; 38(4): 657–663. DOI: 10.1016/S0741-5214(03)00738-9.

de Guerre

O’Donnell

Varkevisser

, et al. Hostile neck anatomy is associated with higher perioperative type IA endoleaks and lower long-term survival after elective endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2019; 70(3): e45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.06.068.

Marone

Freyrie

Ruotolo

, et al. Expert opinion on hostile neck definition in endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (a Delphi consensus). Ann Vasc Surg 2020; 62: 173–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.05.049.

Howard

DPJ

Marron

Sideso

Puckridge

Verhoeven

ELG

Spark

. Editor’s choice – influence of proximal aortic neck diameter on durability of aneurysm sealing and overall survival in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair. Real world data from the gore global registry for endovascular aortic treatment (GREAT). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2018; 56(2): 189–199. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.03.027.

10.

AbuRahma

Campbell

Stone

, et al. The correlation of aortic neck length to early and late outcomes in endovascular aneurysm repair patients. J Vasc Surg 2009; 50(4): 738–748. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.04.061.

11.

Broos

PPHL

’t Mannetje

Cuypers

PWM

, et al. Endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms with hostile aortic neck anatomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 50(3): 313–319. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.04.017.

12.

Jordan

Ouriel

Mehta

, et al. Outcome-based anatomic criteria for defining the hostile aortic neck. J Vasc Surg 2015; 61(6): 1383.e1–1390.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.12.063.

13.

Johansen

Kohler

Nicholls

, et al. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: the Harborview experience. J Vasc Surg 1991; 13(2): 240–245; discussion 245-247.

14.

Jones

Koury

Faris

, et al. Impact of an emergency endovascular aneurysm repair protocol on 30-day ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm mortality. J Vasc Surg 2022; 76(3): 663.e2–670.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.02.050.

15.

Yei

Mathlouthi

Naazie

, et al. Long-term outcomes associated with open vs endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a Medicare-matched database. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5(5): e2212081. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12081.

16.

Brizzi

Gonthier

Déglise

, et al. Lessons learned from the increasing occurrence of late rupture following EVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2019; 58(6): e221–e222. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.06.798.

17.

Regina

Angiletta

Fullone

, et al. Delayed aneurysm rupture after EVAR. IntechOpen, 2013. DOI: 10.5772/53415.

18.

Antoniou

Georgiadis

Antoniou

, et al. Late rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm after previous endovascular repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther 2015; 22(5): 734–744. DOI: 10.1177/1526602815601405.

19.

Rajendran

May

. Late rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 2017; 65(1): 52–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.05.090.

20.

Schanzer

Messina

Ghosh

, et al. Follow-up compliance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare beneficiaries. J Vasc Surg 2015; 61(1): 16–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.06.006.

21.

Jordan

Mehta

Ouriel

, et al. One-year results of the ANCHOR trial of EndoAnchors for the prevention and treatment of aortic neck complications after endovascular aneurysm repair. Vascular 2016; 24(2): 177–186. DOI: 10.1177/1708538115590727.

22.

Jordan

Mehta

Varnagy

, et al. Results of the ANCHOR prospective, multicenter registry of EndoAnchors for type Ia endoleaks and endograft migration in patients with challenging anatomy. J Vasc Surg 2014; 60(4): 885.e2–892.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.04.063.