Abstract
Objectives
A team approach for treatment of patients with CLTI is used worldwide. However, the quality of team medicine is a concern. The Global Vascular Guidelines provide recommendations for high quality team medicine, but there is limited knowledge of the significance of team quality in CLTI treatment. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of team quality on clinical outcomes after infrapopliteal bypass.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was performed in 337 patients who underwent 414 infrapopliteal bypasses under a team medicine approach at a single center between 2009 and 2021. In 2017, team medicine was reorganized for improvement of quality. Comparisons were made between before (Group 1; 160 patients, 195 limbs) and after (Group 2; 177 patients, 219 limbs) reorganization. The primary endpoints were limb salvage and wound healing after infrapopliteal bypass.
Results
The patients included 227 males (67%) and had a median age of 76 [68-83] years. Diabetes mellitus was present in 67% and end-stage renal disease with hemodialysis in 37%. The follow-up rate was 96% in a mean follow-up period of 31±30 months. The 3-year limb salvage rate was significantly lower in Group 1 (before reorganization) than in Group 2 (after reorganization) (84% vs 95%, p = .001). The wound healing rates in the whole cohort were 72% at 6 months and 85% at 12 months, with no significant differences between the groups. In multivariate analysis, the risk factors for major amputation were treatment before reorganization (HR 2.68; p = .017), hemodialysis (HR 2.27; p = .017), and non-ambulatory status (HR 2.63; p = .005).
Conclusions
A reorganized team approach with the goal of higher quality was independently associated with reduced major amputation for patients with CLTI treated with infrapopliteal bypass. This result indicates the importance of a high quality team approach for success of this treatment.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.