This study aimed to assess the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in detecting extracranial carotid artery occlusion.
Materials and methods
A systematic literature search was conducted in the Cochrane, PubMed, and EMBASE databases. Prospective or retrospective studies that reported sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for the diagnosis of carotid artery occlusion were selected. Eight studies (354 arteries) were included in the meta-analysis. A bivariate random-effect model was used to estimate overall sensitivity and specificity. The results were also summarized by developing a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve.
Results
The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative likelihood ratios were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.83–1.00), 0.97 (95% CI: 0.90–0.99), 30.0 (95% CI: 9.8–91.4), and 0.01 (95% CI: 0.00–0.21), respectively; the odds ratio for diagnosis was 4,796 (95% CI: 119–192,584).
Conclusion
The diagnostic test accuracy suggests that CEUS is a reliable tool for diagnosis of extracranial carotid artery occlusion.
GrauAJWeimarCBuggleF, et al.Risk factors, outcome, and treatment in subtypes of ischemic stroke: the German stroke data bank. Stroke2001; 32: 2559–2566.
2.
RafailidisVCharitantiATegosT, et al.Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the carotid system: a review of the current literature. J Ultrasound2017; 20: 97–109.
3.
DesoleACampanileFTosatoF, et al.Surgical treatment for pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2015; 20: 636–640.
4.
AugoustidesJG. Advances in the management of carotid artery disease: focus on recent evidence and guidelines. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth2012; 26: 166–171.
5.
CassolaNBaptista‐SilvaJCFlumignanCD, et al.Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2018; 11: 1–18.
6.
StaubDPartoviSImfeldS, et al.Novel applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in vascular medicine. Vasa2013; 42: 17–31.
7.
ClevertDASommerWHZengelP, et al.Imaging of carotid arterial diseases with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Eur J Radiol2011; 80: 68–76.
8.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Int J Surg2010; 8: 336–341.
9.
LiuRYanZZhangG, et al.Comparison of digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessment of carotid stenosis. Afr Health Sci2020; 20: 509–514.
10.
HammondCJMcPhersonSJPatelJV, et al.Assessment of apparent internal carotid occlusion on ultrasound: Prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2008; 35: 405–412.
11.
HoldenAHopeJKOsborneM, et al.Value of a contrast agent in equivocal carotid ultrasound studies: Pictorial essay. Australas Radiol2000; 44: 253–260.
12.
VenturaCASilvaESCerriGG, et al.Can contrast-enhanced ultrasound with second-generation contrast agents replace computed tomography angiography for distinguishing between occlusion and pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery?Clinics (Sao Paulo)2015; 70: 1–6.
13.
FerrerJMSamsóJJSerrandoJR, et al.Use of ultrasound contrast in the diagnosis of carotid artery occlusion. J Vasc Surg2000; 31: 736–741.
14.
HofsteeDJHooglandPHSchimsheimerRJ, et al.Contrast enhanced color duplex for diagnosis of subtotal stenosis or occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg2000; 102: 9–12.
15.
KonoYPinnellSPSirlinCB, et al.Carotid arteries: Contrast-enhanced US angiography--preliminary clinical experience. Radiology2004; 230: 561–568.
16.
FürstGSalehAWenserskiF, et al.Reliability and validity of noninvasive imaging of internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusion. Stroke1999; 30: 1444–1449.
17.
HeilbergerPSchunnCRitterW, et al.Postoperative color flow duplex scanning in aortic endografting. J Endovasc Surg1997; 4: 262–271.
18.
BendickPJBovePGLongGW, et al.Efficacy of ultrasound scan contrast agents in the noninvasive follow-up of aortic stent grafts. J Vasc Surg2003; 37: 381–385.
ShalhoubJOwenDRGauthierT, et al.The use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in carotid arterial disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2010; 39: 381–387.
21.
PiscagliaFNolsøeCDietrichCF, et al.The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical practice of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): Update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med2012; 33: 33–59.
22.
TangCFangKGuoY, et al.Safety of sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles in sonography of abdominal and superficial organs: Retrospective analysis of 30,222 cases. J Ultrasound Med2017; 36: 531–538.
23.
SchinkelAFKasparMStaubD. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: clinical applications in patients with atherosclerosis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging2016; 32: 35–48.
24.
DrosteDWJürgensRNabaviDG, et al.Echocontrast-enhanced ultrasound of extracranial internal carotid artery high-grade stenosis and occlusion. Stroke1999; 30: 2302–2306.
25.
DrosteDW. Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in neurosonology. Eur Neurol2008; 58(Suppl 1): 2–8.
