We evaluated carotid artery stiffness in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) using acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography and investigated the relationship between stiffness and CAD.
Methods
This study examined 76 CAD patients (aged 60.7 ± 11) and 70 healthy individuals (aged 59.6 ± 9). The left common carotid artery mean shear wave velocity (LCmeanSWV) and the right common carotid artery mean shear wave velocity (RCmeanSWV) of the anterior walls were measured using ARFI elastography, and the results of the patient group and the healthy group were compared. The common carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) was measured in both groups and compared with mean SWV.
Results
The RCmeanSWVs in the patient and healthy groups were 3.47 ± 1 m/s and 2.69 ± 0.90 m/s, respectively (p < 0.001). The LCmeanSWVs in the patient and healthy groups were 3.60 ± 0.9 m/s and 2.90 ± 0.80 m/s, respectively (p < 0.001). A significant correlation was found between the RCmeanSWV and the right CIMT values and between the LCmeanSWV and the left CIMT values (r = 0.231, p = 0.03 and r = 0.331, p = 0.002, respectively).
Conclusions
The mean SWV values of carotid arteries of CAD patients measured with ARFI elastography were significantly higher than the mean SWV values of the carotid arteries of healthy individuals. Thus, measurement of the carotid artery SWV could be a potential tool in the risk evaluation of cardiovascular disease. Nonetheless, new studies are required to determine whether this method serves as a useful additional tool.
O’LearyDHPolakJFKronmalRA, et al.Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. New Engl J Med1999; 340: 14–22.
2.
DegrellPSorbetsEFeldmanLJ, et al.Screening for coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals: why and how?Arch Cardiovasc Dis2015; 108: 675–682.
3.
LorenzMWMarkusHSBotsML, et al.Prediction of clinical cardiovascular events with carotid intima-media thickness. Circulation2007; 115: 459–467.
4.
SpenceJDEliasziwMDiCiccoM, et al.Carotid plaque area. Stroke2002; 33: 2916–2922.
5.
InabaYChenJABergmannSR. Carotid plaque, compared with carotid intima-media thickness, more accurately predicts coronary artery disease events: a meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis2012; 220: 128–133.
6.
WidlanskyMEGokceNKeaneyJFJr, et al.The clinical implications of endothelial dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol2003; 42: 1149–1160.
7.
GokceNVitaJA. Clinical manifestations of endothelial dysfunction. In: LoscalzoJSchaferAI (eds). Thrombosis and hemorrhage. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002, p. 685.
8.
CeceljaMChowienczykP. Role of arterial stiffness in cardiovascular disease. JRSM Cardiovascular Disease2012; 1: 012016.: cvd.
9.
van SlotenTTSchramMTvan den HurkK, et al.Local stiffness of the carotid and femoral artery is associated with incident cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol2014; 63: 1739–1747.
10.
PalomboCKozakovaM. Arterial stiffness, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk: pathophysiologic mechanisms and emerging clinical indications. Vasc Pharmacol2016; 77: 1–7.
11.
OliverJJWebbDJ. Noninvasive assessment of arterial stiffness and risk of atherosclerotic events. Arteriosclerosis, Thromb Vasc Biol2003; 23: 554–566.
12.
Van PopeleNMGrobbeeDEBotsML, et al.Association between arterial stiffness and atherosclerosis. Stroke2001; 32: 454–460.
13.
GambleGZornJSandersG, et al.Estimation of arterial stiffness, compliance, and distensibility from M-mode ultrasound measurements of the common carotid artery. Stroke1994; 25: 11–16.
14.
AlanBGöyaCAktanA, et al.Renal acoustic radiation force impulse elastography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease. Acta Radiologica2017; 58: 156–163.
15.
HuntSABakerDWChinMH, et al.American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure); International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, 104. Heart Failure Socie America Endorsed by the Heart Failure Socie America, 2001, p. 2996.
16.
PanFSYuLLuoJ, et al.Carotid artery stiffness assessment by ultrafast ultrasound imaging: feasibility and potential influencing factors. J Ultrasound Med2018; 37(12): 2759–2767.
17.
RaoSVStoneGW. Arterial access and arteriotomy site closure devices. Nat Rev Cardiol2016; 13: 641–650.
18.
RyanTJFaxonDPGunnarRM, et al.Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. a report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures (subcommittee on percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty). Circulation1988; 78: 486–502.
19.
LiZDuLWangF, et al.Assessment of the arterial stiffness in patients with acute ischemic stroke using longitudinal elasticity modulus measurements obtained with shear wave elastography. Med Ultrasonography2016; 18: 182.
20.
AlisDDurmazESMCivcikC, et al.Assessment of the common carotid artery wall stiffness by shear wave elastography in behcet’s disease. Med Ultrasonography2018; 20: 446.
21.
ByenfeldtMElvinAFranssonP. Influence of Probe Pressure on ultrasound-based shear wave elastography of the liver using comb-push 2-D technology. Ultrasound Med Biol2019; 45: 411–428.
22.
GoertzREggerCNeurathM, et al.Impact of food intake, ultrasound transducer, breathing maneuvers and body position on acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastometry of the liver. Ultraschall der Medizin - Eur J Ultrasound2012; 33: 380–385.
23.
O’RourkeMFStaessenJAVlachopoulosC, et al.Clinical applications of arterial stiffness; definitions and reference values. Am J Hypertens2002; 15: 426.
24.
WoodmanRJWattsGF. Measurement and application of arterial stiffness in clinical research: focus on new methodologies and diabetes mellitus. Med Science Monitor: Intern Medi J Experiment Clinical Resear2003; 9: RA81–9.
25.
GibbonsGHDzauVJ. The emerging concept of vascular remodeling. New Engl J Medi1994; 330: 1431–1438.
26.
LakattaEG. Arterial and cardiac aging: major shareholders in cardiovascular disease enterprises. Circulation2003; 107: 490–497.
27.
VirmaniRAvolioAPMergnerWJ, et al.Effect of aging on aortic morphology in populations with high and low prevalence of hypertension and atherosclerosis. comparison between occidental and chinese communities. Am J Pathology1991; 139: 1119–1129.
28.
WidmanEMaksutiEAmadorC, et al.Shear wave elastography quantifies stiffness in ex vivo porcine artery with stiffened arterial region. Ultrasound Med Biol2016; 42: 2423–2435.
29.
DartAMKingwellBA. Pulse pressure-a review of mechanisms and clinical relevance. J Am Coll Cardiol2001; 37: 975–984.
30.
MessasEPernotMCouadeM. Arterial wall elasticity: state of the art and future prospects. Diagn Interv Imaging2013; 94: 561–569.
31.
MaraisLPernotMKhettabH, et al.Arterial stiffness assessment by shear wave elastography and ultrafast pulse wave imaging: comparison with reference techniques in normotensives and hypertensives. Ultrasound Med Biol2019; 45: 758–772.
32.
Roy CardinalM-HDurandMChartrand-LefebvreC, et al.Increased carotid artery wall stiffness and plaque prevalence in HIV infected patients measured with ultrasound elastography. Eur Radiol2020; 30: 3178–3187.
33.
El JalboutRCloutierGRoy-CardinalM-H, et al.The value of non-invasive vascular elastography (NIVE) in detecting early vascular changes in overweight and obese children. Eur Radiol2019; 29: 3854–3861.
34.
ZhuZ-QChenL-SWangH, et al.Carotid stiffness and atherosclerotic risk: non-invasive quantification with ultrafast ultrasound pulse wave velocity. Eur Radiol2019; 29: 1507–1517.
35.
CouadeMPernotMPradaC, et al.Quantitative assessment of arterial Wall biomechanical properties using shear wave imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol2010; 36: 1662–1676.
36.
DumontDMDohertyJRTraheyGE. Noninvasive assessment of wall-shear rate and vascular elasticity using combined ARFI/SWEI/spectral Doppler imaging system. Ultrason Imaging2011; 33: 165–188.
37.
ZhuZ-QChenL-SWangH, et al.Carotid stiffness and atherosclerotic risk: non-invasive quantification with ultrafast ultrasound pulse wave velocity. Eur Radiol2019; 29: 1507–1517.
