Evolution and clinical relevance of common iliac artery seal zone after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

Abstract

Objective

Data in literature suggest iliac artery dilatation and endograft retraction as complications after endovascular aneurysm repair. However, mainly older generation endografts were included. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the distal sealing zone chronological changes after endovascular aneurysm repair with newer generation stent-grafts.

Methods

Clinical and radiological data of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms treated with endovascular aneurysm repair between January 2010 and December 2013 were reviewed. Measurements were made using volumetric reconstructions in the first and last available computed tomography angiography. Endpoints of the study were the presence of iliac dilatation and retraction of the endograft. Association with distal oversizing and sealing length was analyzed.

Results

Consecutive patients with a total of 52 common iliac arteries were included in the study (mean age 74.9 ± 6.8 years, four women (7.7%)). The mean follow-up was 3.1 years. The mean iliac diameter increased from 15.5 to 17.1 mm (p < .001) in the first control computed tomography angiography and to 18.7 mm (p < .001) in the last available computed tomography angiography. No endograft (Endurant by Medtronic (24/52; 46%), Excluder de Gore (23/52; 44%), Zenith by Cook (5/52; 9%)) was associated with dilatation (p = .066) or iliac retraction (p = .591). Two type Ib endoleaks were found (3.8%) and successfully treated with distal graft extension. An iliac branch retraction of ≥5 mm was identified in seven cases (13%). Iliac arteries treated with limbs of ≥24 mm in diameter dilated significantly more than the rest of limbs (5.37 mm versus 3.12 mm; p = .022). In the last available imaging, iliac dilatation was ≥20% in 28 cases (53.8%) and had exceeded the diameter of the implanted endograft in 20 cases (38.4%). Iliac dilatation (OR 15.11 per mm, p = .025) was identified as a risk factor for retraction ≥5 mm.

Conclusion

Iliac dilatation and endograft limb retraction are common findings after endovascular aneurysm repair despite the use of new generation endografts. Optimizing the iliac sealing length and meticulous computed tomography angiography surveillance are recommended especially in case of use ≥24 mm iliac stent-grafts to prevent possible complications.

Keywords

Endoleak endovascular aneurysm repair complications iliac dilation iliac sealing lima retraction new generation endografts

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chaikof

Brewster

Dalman

et al. SVS practice guidelines for the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: executive summary. J Vasc Surg 2009; 50: 880–896.

Moll

Powell

Fraedrich

et al. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 41 Suppl 1: S1--S58. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.09.011

Powell

Sweeting

Ulug

et al. Meta-analysis of individual-patient data from EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials comparing outcomes of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm over 5 years. Br J Surg 2017; 104: 166--178. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10430

Kim

Park

Ahn

et al. Chronological change of the sac after endovascular aneurysm repair. Vasc Specialist Int 2016; 32: 150--159. doi: 10.5758/vsi.2016.32.4.150

Diehm

Dick

Katzen

et al. Aortic neck dilatation after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a word of caution. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47: 886--892. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.041

Kaladji

Cardon

Laviolle

et al. Evolution of the upper and lower landing site after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. YMVA 2007; 55: 24–32.

Gonçalves

FB.

Iliac seal zone dynamics and clinical consequences after endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017; 53: 185--192. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.11.003

Sampaio

Panneton

Mozes

et al. AneuRx device migration: incidence, risk factors, and consequences. Ann Vasc Surg 2005; 19: 178--185

Arko

Heikkinen

Lee

et al. Iliac fixation length and resistance to in-vivo stent-graft displacement. J Vasc Surg 2005; 41: 664--671.

10.

Marrewijk

Van Leurs

Vallabhaneni

et al. Risk-adjusted outcome analysis of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a large population: how do stent-grafts compare? J Endovasc Ther 2005; 12: 417--429.

11.

Zeggeren

L Van

Gonçalves

Herwaarden

JA Van

et al. Incidence and treatment results of Endurant endograft occlusion. J Vasc Surg 2012; 57: 1246–1254.

12.

Mantas

Antonopoulos

Sfyroeras

et al. Factors predisposing to endograft limb occlusion after endovascular aortic repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 49: 39–44.

13.

Dowson

Boult

Cowled

et al. Development of an automated measure of iliac artery tortuosity that successfully predicts early graft-related complications associated with endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 48: 153–160.

14.

Gonçalves

Luijtgaarden

KMVD

Hoeks

SE.

Adequate seal and no endoleak on the first postoperative computed tomography angiography as criteria for no additional imaging up to 5 years after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2011; 57: 1503–1511.

15.

Tokunaga

Ihara

Banno

et al. The relationship between temporal changes in proximal neck angulation and stent-graft migration after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2017; 39: 119–127.

16.

Falkensammer

Hakaim

Oldenburg

et al. Natural History of the iliac arteries after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and suitability of ectatic iliac arteries as a distal sealing zone. J Endovasc Ther 2007; 14: 619--624

17.

Griffin

Scali

Feezor

et al. Fate of aneurysmal common iliac artery landing zones used for endovascular aortic repair. J Endovasc Ther 2015; 22: 748--759. doi: 10.1177/1526602815602121

18.

Heikkinen

Alsac

Arko

et al. The importance of iliac fixation in prevention of stent graft migration. J Endovasc Ther 2007; 14: 619--624.

19.

Waasdorp

Vries

JPMD

Sterkenburg

et al. The association between iliac fixation and proximal stent-graft migration during EVAR follow-up: mid-term results of 154 talent devices. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009; 37: 681–687.

20.

Benharash

Lee

Abilez

et al. Iliac fixation inhibits migration of both suprarenal and infrarenal aortic endografts. J Vasc Surg 2007; 45: 250--257.

21.

Waasdorp

Gorrepati

Rafii

et al. Sideways displacement of the endograft within the aneurysm sac is associated with late adverse events after endovascular aneurysm repair. YMVA 2007; 55: 947–955.

22.

Cochennec

Becquemin

Desgranges

et al. Limb graft occlusion following EVAR: clinical pattern, outcomes and predictive factors of occurrence. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 34: 59--56

23.

Dube

FCS

Vries

JPMD.

Fate of enlarged iliac arteries after endovascular or open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther 2016; 23: 803--808. doi: 10.1177/1526602816661832

24.

Schanzer

Greenberg

Hevelone

et al. Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair. Circulation 2011; 123: 2848--2855. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.014902

25.

Favre

Bouziane

Haase

Aneurysmal extension to the iliac bifurcation increases the risk of complications and secondary procedures after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Ann Vasc Surg 2010; 24: 663--669. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.01.008

26.

Hobo

Sybrandy

JEM

Harris

PL.

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms with concomitant common iliac artery aneurysm: outcome analysis of the EUROSTAR experience. J Endovasc Ther 2008; 15: 12--22. doi: 10.1583/07-2217.1

27.

Adiseshiah

Boardley

Raphael

et al. Late iliac artery aneurysm formation: implications for the lower landing site after EVAR to the editors. J Endovasc Ther 2008; 15: 246--247. doi: 10.1583/08-2356.1

28.

Pinto Sousa

Brandão

PCA.

Which aneurysm characteristics predict EVAR nonsuccess. Rev Port Cir Cardiothorac Vasc 2017; 24: 148.

29.

Sirignano

Speziale

Capoccia

et al. Iliac and femoropopliteal arteries morphological CTA features as determinants of outcome after standard EVAR procedures. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2016.