Cardiopulmonary-induced deformations of the thoracic aorta following thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Abstract

Objectives

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair has become a preferred treatment strategy for thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. Yet, it is not well understood if the performance of endografts is affected by physiologic strain due to cyclic aortic motion during cardiac pulsation and respiration. We aim to quantify cardiac- and respiratory-induced changes of the postthoracic endovascular aortic repair thoracic aorta and endograft geometries.

Methods

Fifteen thoracic endovascular aortic repair patients (66 ± 10 years) underwent cardiac-resolved computed tomography angiographies during inspiratory/expiratory breath holds. The computed tomography angiography images were utilized to build models of the aorta, and lumen centerlines and cross-sections were extracted. Arclength and curvature were computed from the lumen centerline. Effective diameter was computed from cross-sections of the thoracic aorta. Deformation was computed from the mid-diastole to end-systole (cardiac deformation) and expiration to inspiration (respiratory deformation).

Results

Cardiac pulsation induced significant changes in arclength, mean curvature, maximum curvature change, and effective diameter of the ascending aorta, as well as effective diameter of the stented aortic segment. Respiration, however, induced significant change in mean curvature and effective diameter of the ascending aorta only. Cardiac-induced arclength change of the ascending aorta was significantly greater than respiratory-induced arclength change.

Conclusions

Deformations are present across the thoracic aorta due to cardiopulmonary influences after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. The geometric deformations are greatest in the ascending aorta and decline at the stented thoracic aorta. Additional investigation is warranted to correlate aortic deformation to endograft performance.

Keywords

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair thoracic aorta deformation modeling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Tse

Chang

Lee

et al . A computational fluid dynamics study on geometrical influence of the aorta on hemodynamics. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 43: 829–838.

Ullery

Suh

Hirotsu

et al . Geometric deformations of the thoracic aorta and supra-aortic arch branch vessels following thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2018; 52: 173–180.

Suh

Beygui

Fleischmann

et al . Aortic arch vessel geometries and deformations in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 25: 1903–1911.

Hirotsu

Suh

Lee

et al . Changes in geometry and cardiac deformation of the thoracic aorta after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Ann Vasc Surg 2018; 46: 83–89.

Weber

Tetzlaff

Rengier

et al . Respiratory displacement of the thoracic aorta: physiological phenomenon with potential implications for thoracic endovascular repair. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2009; 32: 658–665.

Weber

Ganten

Bockler

et al . Heartbeat-related displacement of the thoracic aorta in patients with chronic aortic dissection type B: quantification by dynamic CTA. Eur J Radiol 2009; 72: 483–488.

Mitchell

Ishimaru

Ehrlich

et al . First international summit on thoracic aortic endografting: roundtable on thoracic aortic dissection as an indication for endografting. J Endovasc Ther 2002; 9: II98–II105.

Wang

Dutton

Taylor

CA.

Improving geometric model construction for blood flow modeling: geometric image segmentation and image-based model construction for computational hemodynamics. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 1999; 18: 33–39.

Wilson

Wang

Dutton

et al . A software framework for creating patient specific geometric models from medical imaging data for simulation based medical planning of vascular surgery. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2001; 2208: 449–456.

10.

Choi

Cheng

Wilson

et al . Methods for quantifying three-dimensional deformation of arteries due to pulsatile and nonpulsatile forces: implications for the design of stents and stent grafts. Ann Biomed Eng 2009; 37: 14–33.

11.

Cheng

Zhu

Suh

GY.

Optimization of three-dimensional modeling for geometric precision and efficiency for healthy and diseased aortas. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2018; 21: 65–74.

12.

Suh

Choi

Herfkens

et al . Respiratory deformations of the superior mesenteric artery and renal arteries in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24: 1035–1042.

13.

Ullery

Suh

Lee

et al . Geometry and respiratory-induced deformation of abdominal branch vessels following complex EVAR. J Vasc Surg 2015; 61: 875–884.

14.

FDA Guidance Document #1545. Non-clinical engineering tests and recommended labeling for intravascular stents and associated delivery systems. Silver Spring, MD: FDA Interventional Cardiology Devices Branch and Peripheral Vascular Devices Branch, 2010.

15.

ASTM F2477-07. Standard test methods for in vitro pulsatile durability testing of vascular stents. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2013.

16.

ASTM F2942-13. Standard guide for in vitro axial, bending, and torsional durability testing of vascular stents. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2013.

17.

ASTM F2514-08. Standard guide for finite element analysis (FEA) of metallic vascular stents subjected to uniform radial loading. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2014.

18.

Sailer

Wagemans

Das

et al . Quantification of respiratory movement of the aorta and side branches. J Endovasc Ther 2015; 22: 905–911.

19.

Weber

Gante

Böckler

et al . Assessment of thoracic aortic conformational changes by four-dimensional computed tomography angiography in patients with chronic aortic dissection type b. Eur J Radiol 2009; 19: 245–253.

20.

Beller

Labrosse

Thubrikar

et al . Finite element modeling of the thoracic aorta: including aortic root motion to evaluate the risk of aortic dissection. J Med Eng Technol 2008; 32: 167–170.

21.

Emilsson

Egerlid

Nygren

BM.

Comparison between aortic annulus motion and mitral annulus motion obtained using echocardiography. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2006; 26: 257–262.

22.

Ginghina

Beladan

Iancu

et al . Respiratory maneuvers in echocardiography: a review of clinical applications. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2009; 7: 42–55.

23.

Appleton

Jensen

Hatle

et al . Doppler evaluation of left and right ventricular diastolic function: a technical guide for obtaining optimal flow velocity recordings. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997; 10: 271–291.

24.

Lee

Abbas

Khandheria

et al . Echocardiographic assessment of right heart hemodynamic parameters. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007; 20: 773–782.

25.

de Beaufort

HWL

Coda

Conti

et al . Changes in aortic pulse wave velocity of four thoracic aortic stent grafts in an ex vivo porcine model. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0186080.

26.

Nauta

FJH

Hwl

Conti

et al . Impact of thoracic endovascular aortic repair on radial strain in an ex vivo porcine model. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 51: 783–789.