Three-year follow-up and quality of life of endovenous radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein with the ClosureFast™ procedure: Influence of BMI and CEAP class

Abstract

Purpose

Endovascular ablation of the great saphenous vein has been proposed as a less invasive alternative to conventional ligation and stripping of varicose veins. Outcomes of patients treated with the radiofrequency ablation ClosureFast™ system over an eight-year period from a single-center were evaluated.

Methods

Three-year follow-up data included duplex ultrasound scan, complication rate, and questionnaires to assess patients’ QOL, level of pain, and days off work.

Results

A total of 1080 consecutive patients (49.5 ± 18.6 years, 72% female, mean body mass index: 25.44 ± 4.1 kg m⁻²) underwent radiofrequency ablation for incompetent saphenous veins in a single institution. Occlusion of the great saphenous vein was obtained in 98.6% and 93.8% cases at the end of the procedures and within 36 months, respectively. Only three deep venous thromboses and minor complications occurred in this series throughout the first week from the procedure. A decrease of the external vein diameter, equal to 72.7% and 31.1% of the pretreatment diameter, was observed at 1 week and 36 months, respectively. The average Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire score improved from 18.06 ± 9.47 before treatment to 11.56 ± 10.23 at 12 months, with no significant differences in the subsequent follow-up. SF-36 QOL scores significantly improved after the procedure in all domains, while there were no changes over time. Patients reported a prompt return to normal daily activities (1.5 ± 0.7 days) and work (3.1 ± 1.9 days). Body mass index influenced QOL scores, while it did not affect great saphenous vein diameter reduction during the follow-up. On the contrary, Clinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic class significantly influenced both great saphenous vein diameter reduction after the treatment and QOL scores within 36 months.

Conclusion

Results of this retrospective monocentric, large patients study suggest that radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein may be a safe and efficient alternative to conventional surgery.

Keywords

Chronic venous insufficiency varicose veins endovenous technique radiofrequency ablation QOL

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Evans

Fowkes

Hajivassiliou

et al . Epidemiology of varicose veins. A review. Int Angiol 1994; 13: 263–270.

Rutgers

and Kitslaar

PJ.

Randomized trial of stripping versus high ligation combined with sclerotherapy in the treatment of the incompetent greater saphenous vein. Am J Surg 1994; 168: 311–315.

Rautio

Ohinmaa

Perälä

et al . Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: a randomized controlled trial with comparison of the costs. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35: 958–965.

Jin

Ohe

Hwang

et al . Radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins improves venous clinical severity score despite failure of complete closure of the saphenous vein after 1 year. Asian J Surg 2017; 40: 48–54.

Proebstle

Alm

Göckeritz

et al . Three-year European follow-up of endovenous radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein with or without treatment of calf varicosities. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54: 146–152.

Rasmussen

Lawaetz

Bjoern

et al . Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 1079–1087.

Dietzek

AM.

Endovenous radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of varicose veins. Vascular 2007; 15: 255–261.

Lurie

Creton

Eklof

et al . Prospective randomised study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure) versus ligation and vein stripping (EVOLVeS): two-year follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005; 29: 67–73.

Lawaetz

Serup

Lawaetz

et al . Comparison of endovenous radiofrequency ablation, laser ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Extended 5-year follow-up of a RCT. Int Angiol 2017; 36: 281–288.

10.

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins. IPG8. London: UK NICE, www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg8 (2003, accessed 8 June 2017).

11.

García-Madrid

Pastor Manrique

Gómez-Blasco

et al . Update on endovenous radio-frequency closure ablation of varicose veins. Ann Vasc Surg 2012; 26: 281–291.

12.

Tolva

Cireni

Bianchi

et al . Radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein with the ClosureFAST™ procedure: mid-term experience on 400 patients from a single centre. Surg Today 2013; 43: 741–744.

13.

Kistner

Eklof

and Masuda

EM.

Diagnosis of chronic venous disease of the lower extremities: the ‘CEAP’ classification. Mayo Clin Proc 1996; 71: 338–345.

14.

Truckai C and Shadduck J. Electrosurgical instrument and method. US Pat 7517349 B2, 2009.

15.

Chen

Wright

and Humphrey

JD.

Heat-induced changes in the mechanics of a collagenous tissue: isothermal, isotonic shrinkage. J Biomech Eng 1998; 120: 382.

16.

Braithwaite

and Braithwaite

BD.

Clinical utility of the Covidien Closure Fast™ Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter. Med Devices (Auckl) 2014; 7: 179–185.

17.

Proebstle

Vago

Alm

et al . Treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein by endovenous radiofrequency powered segmental thermal ablation: first clinical experience. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47: 151–156.e1.

18.

Smith

Garratt

Guest

et al . Evaluating and improving health-related quality of life in patients with varicose veins. J Vasc Surg 1999; 30: 710–719.

19.

Garratt

Macdonald

Ruta

et al . Towards measurement of outcome for patients with varicose veins. Qual Heal Care 1993; 2: 5–10.

20.

Anwar

Lane

TRA

Davies

et al . Complications of radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins. Phlebology 2012; 27: 34–39.

21.

Min

Khilnani

and Zimmet

SE.

Endovenous laser treatment of saphenous vein reflux: long-term results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: 991–996.

22.

Bisang

Meier

Enzler

et al . Results of endovenous ClosureFast treatment for varicose veins in an outpatient setting. Phlebology 2012; 27: 118–123.

23.

Shepherd

Gohel

Brown

et al . Randomized clinical trial of VNUS® ClosureFAST™ radiofrequency ablation versus laser for varicose veins. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 810–818.

24.

Almeida

Kaufman

Göckeritz

et al . Radiofrequency endovenous ClosureFAST versus laser ablation for the treatment of great saphenous reflux: a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized study (RECOVERY study). J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20: 752–759.

25.

Morrison

Saphenous ablation: what are the choices, laser or RF energy. Semin Vasc Surg 2005; 18: 15–18.

26.

Fan

C-M

and Rox-Anderson

Endovenous laser ablation: mechanism of action. Phlebology 2008; 23: 206–213.

27.

Weiss

RA.

Comparison of endovenous radiofrequency versus 810 nm diode laser occlusion of large veins in an animal model. Dermatologic Surg 2002; 28: 56–61.

28.

Lurie

Creton

Eklof

et al . Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure procedure) versus ligation and stripping in a selected patient population (EVOLVeS Study). J Vasc Surg 2003; 38: 207–214.