The effect of increasing operator experience on procedure-related characteristics in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of carotid artery stenting for the treatment of severe carotid artery disease in our department and to investigate the effect of increasing operator experience on perioperative and procedure-related characteristics.

Methods

From January 2007 to February 2015 200 patients underwent 207 endovascular procedures for carotid artery stenosis. Of all, 113 arteries (56.5%) were symptomatic. Significant changes across time were calculated with the use of Change Point analysis using bootstrap and mean squared error estimates.

Results

The technical success was 98.6% (204/207 cases). Thirty-day neurological events included stroke in four patients (2%) and transient ischemic attack in two (1%). None of the patients died during the first 30 days. The most significant change of radiation duration occurred after the 33rd patient with a decrease from 25.31 min to 12.31 min, while for the total operative time that change occurred between the 31st and 33rd patient where mean operation time decreased from 88.89 min to 49.22 min. The most significant change of contrast media used occurred at the 40th patient with a decrease from 91.58 ml to 62 ml. During a mean follow-up period of 42 ± 20.02 months none of the patients experienced any cerebrovascular event. There was one case of significant recurrent stenosis, which was successfully treated by endovascular means.

Conclusions

Endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis performed in a single center with the use of a cerebral protection device seems to consist a safe therapeutic choice with acceptable results, within the referenced benchmarks proposed in the latest guidelines. Certain perioperative parameters such as the amount of contrast media used, the fluoroscopy and operation time, seem to decline overtime indicating increasing operator’s experience. A number of performed cases above 40 was related to the significant decrease of those parameters and may represent the learning curve of the procedure.

Keywords

Operator experience carotid artery stenting

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Rosamond

Flegal

Friday

et al.

Heart disease and stroke statistics–2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2007; 115: 69–71.

Paraskevas

Mikhailidis

Veith

. Comparison of the five 2011 guidelines for the treatment of carotid stenosis. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55: 1504–1508.

Ringleb

Allenberg

Bruckmann

et al.

30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2006; 368: 1239–1247.

Mas

Chatellier

Beyssen

. Carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection: clinical alert from the Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial. Stroke 2004; 35: 18–20.

International Carotid Stenting Study Investigators. Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 375: 985–997.

Mantese

Timaran

Chiu

et al.

CREST Investigators. The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST): stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for carotid disease. Stroke 2010; 41: S31–S34.

Garg

Karagiorgos

Pisimisis

et al.

Cerebral protection devices reduce periprocedural strokes during carotid angioplasty and stenting: a systematic review of the current literature. J Endovasc Ther 2009; 16: 412–427.

Badheka

Chothani

Panaich

et al.

Impact of symptoms, gender, co-morbidities, and operator volume on outcome of carotid artery stenting (from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample [2006 to 2010]). Am J Cardiol 2014; 114: 933–941.

Hirshfeld

Jr Balter

Brinker

et al.

American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association/; HRS; SCAI; American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training. ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training. Circulation 2005; 111: 511–532.

10.

Nicolaides

Shifrin

Bradbury

et al.

Angiographic and duplex grading of internal carotid stenosis: can we overcome the confusion?

J Endovasc Surg 1996; 3: 158–165.

11.

Roffi

Greutmann

Eberli

et al.

Starting a carotid artery stenting program is safe. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 71: 469–473.

12.

Bangalore

Kumar

Wetterslev

et al.

Carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy: meta-analysis and diversity-adjusted trial sequential analysis of randomized trials. Arch Neurol 2011; 68: 172–184.

13.

Nolan

De Martino

Goodney

et al.

Vascular Study Group of New England. Comparison of carotid endarterectomy and stenting in real world practice using a regional quality improvement registry. J Vasc Surg 2012; 56: 990–996.

14.

Ibrahim

Karmann

Schuster

et al.

Safety and mid-term outcome of endovascular therapy for internal carotid artery disease: a 15-year experience at a single-centre angiology institution. Vasa 2013; 42: 196–207.

15.

White

. Carotid artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: 722–731.

16.

Liapis

Bell

Mikhailidis

et al.

ESVS Guidelines Collaborators. ESVS guidelines. Invasive treatment for carotid stenosis: indications, techniques. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009; 37: 1–19.

17.

Roubin

New

Iyer

et al.

Immediate and late clinical outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a 5-year prospective analysis. Circulation 2001; 103: 532–537.

18.

Maggio

Altamura

Landi

et al.

Diffusion-weighted lesions after carotid artery stenting are associated with cognitive impairment. J Neurol Sci 2013; 328: 58–63.

19.

Bijuklic

Wandler

Hazizi

et al.

The PROFI study (Prevention of Cerebral Embolization by Proximal Balloon Occlusion Compared to Filter Protection During Carotid Artery Stenting): a prospective randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 1383–1389.

20.

Timaran

Rosero

Higuera

et al.

Randomized clinical trial of open-cell vs closed-cell stents for carotid stenting and effects of stent design on cerebral embolization. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54: 1310–1316.

21.

Bosiers

de Donato

Deloose

et al.

Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting?

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 33: 135–141.

22.

Kouvelos

Patelis

Antoniou

et al.

Meta-analysis of the effect of stent design on 30-day outcome after carotid artery stenting. J Endovasc Ther 2015; 22: 789–797.

23.

Modrall

Chung

Kirkwood

et al.

Low rates of complications for carotid artery stenting are associated with a high clinician volume of carotid artery stenting and aortic endografting but not with a high volume of percutaneous coronary interventions. J Vasc Surg 2014; 60: 70–76.

24.

Carafiello

De Lodovici

Piffaretti

et al.

Carotid artery stenting: influence of experience and cerebrovascular risk factors on outcome. Diagn Interv Imaging 2014; 95: 421–426.

25.

Calvet

Mas

Algra

et al.

Carotid Stenting Trialists’ Collaboration. Carotid stenting: is there an operator effect? A pooled analysis from the carotid stenting trialists’ collaboration. Stroke 2014; 45: 527–532.

26.

Bates

Babb

Casey

Jr et al.

American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force; American Society of Interventional & Therapeutic Neuroradiology; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology; Society for Interventional Radiology. ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on carotid stenting. Vasc Med 2007; 12: 35–83.

27.

Mas

Trinquart

Leys

et al.

Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7: 885–892.

28.

Bonati

Dobson

Featherstone

et al.

for the International Carotid Stenting Study investigators. Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomized trial. Lancet 2015; 385: 529–538.