Varicose vein has become enlarged and twisted and, consequently, has lost its mechanical strength. As a result of the varicose saphenous vein (SV) mechanical alterations, the hemodynamic parameters of the blood flow, such as blood velocity as well as vein wall stress and strain, would change accordingly. However, little is known about stress and strain and there consequences under experimental conditions on blood flow and velocity within normal and varicose veins. In this study, a three-dimensional (3D) computational fluid–structure interaction (FSI) model of a human healthy and varicose SVs was established to determine the hemodynamic characterization of the blood flow as a function of vein wall mechanical properties, i.e. elastic and hyperelastic.
Methods
The mechanical properties of the human healthy and varicose SVs were experimentally measured and implemented into the computational model. The fully coupled fluid and structure models were solved using the explicit dynamics finite element code LS-DYNA.
Results
The results revealed that, regardless of healthy and varicose, the elastic walls reach to the ultimate strength of the vein wall, whereas the hyperelastic wall can tolerate more stress. The highest von Mises stress compared to the healthy ones was seen in the elastic and hyperelastic varicose SVs with 1.412 and 1.535 MPa, respectively. In addition, analysis of the resultant displacement in the vein wall indicated that the varicose SVs experienced a higher displacement compared to the healthy ones irrespective of elastic and hyperelastic material models. The highest blood velocity was also observed for the healthy hyperelastic SV wall.
Conclusion
The findings of this study may have implications not only for determining the role of the vein wall mechanical properties in the hemodynamic alterations of the blood, but also for employing as a null information in balloon-angioplasty and bypass surgeries.
YataniASeidelCAllenJ. Whole-cell and single-channel calcium currents of isolated smooth muscle cells from saphenous vein. Circulation Res1987; 60: 523–533.
2.
DwerryhouseSDaviesBHarradineK. Stripping the long saphenous vein reduces the rate of reoperation for recurrent varicose veins: five-year results of a randomized trial. J Vasc Surg1999; 29: 589–592.
3.
BurkittDP. Varicose veins: facts and fantasy. Arch Surg1976; 111: 1327–1332.
4.
TraversJBrookesCEvansJ. Assessment of wall structure and composition of varicose veins with reference to collagen, elastin and smooth muscle content. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg1996; 11: 230–237.
5.
KarimiANavidbakhshMRazaghiR. A finite element study of balloon expandable stent for plaque and arterial wall vulnerability assessment. J Appl Phys2014; 116: 044701–044710.
6.
KarimiANavidbakhshMYamadaH. A nonlinear finite element simulation of balloon expandable stent for assessment of plaque vulnerability inside a stenotic artery. Med Biol Eng Comput2014; 52: 589–599.
7.
KarimiANavidbakhshMFaghihiS. A comparative study on plaque vulnerability using constitutive equations. Perfusion2014; 29: 178–183.
8.
AbdiMKarimiANavidbakhshM. A lumped parameter mathematical model to analyze the effects of tachycardia and bradycardia on the cardiovascular system. Int J Numer Model2015; 28: 346–357.
9.
BaratiEHalabianMKarimiA. Numerical evaluation of stenosis location effects on hemodynamics and shear stress through curved artery. J Biomater Tissue Eng2014; 4: 358–366.
10.
AbrahamPLeftheriotisGDesvauxB. Diameter and blood velocity changes in the saphenous vein during thermal stress. European J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol1994; 69: 305–308.
11.
AbrahamPLeftheriotisGDesvauxB. Diameter and velocity changes in the femoral vein during thermal stress in humans. Clinical Physiol1994; 14: 15–21.
12.
BandykDFKaebnickHWBergaminiTM. Hemodynamics of in situ saphenous vein arterial bypass. Arch Surg1988; 123: 477–482.
13.
GusicRJMyungRPetkoM. Shear stress and pressure modulate saphenous vein remodeling ex vivo. J Biomech2005; 38: 1760–1769.
14.
GusicRJPetkoMMyungR. Mechanical properties of native and ex vivo remodeled porcine saphenous veins. J Biomech2005; 38: 1770–1779.
15.
LeaskRLButanyJJohnstonKW. Human saphenous vein coronary artery bypass graft morphology, geometry and hemodynamics. Ann Biomed Eng2005; 33: 301–309.
16.
KarimiANavidbakhshMRazaghiR. Plaque and arterial vulnerability investigation in a three-layer atherosclerotic human coronary artery using computational fluid–structure interaction method. J Appl Phys2014; 116: 064701–064710.
17.
PeskinCSMcQueenDM. A three-dimensional computational method for blood flow in the heart I. Immersed elastic fibers in a viscous incompressible fluid. J Comp Phys1989; 81: 372–405.
18.
BatheKJ. Finite element procedures, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1996.
19.
LeiMGiddensDJonesS. Pulsatile flow in an end-to-side vascular graft model: comparison of computations with experimental data. J Biomech Eng2001; 123: 80–87.
20.
TangDYangCKobayashiS. Effect of a lipid pool on stress/strain distributions in stenotic arteries: 3-D fluid–structure interactions (FSI) models. J Biomech Eng2004; 126: 363–370.
21.
KarimiANavidbakhshMHaghiAM. Measurement of the uniaxial mechanical properties of rat brains infected by Plasmodium berghei ANKA. Proc IMechE Part H: J Eng Med2013; 227: 609–614.
22.
KarimiANavidbakhshMBeigzadehB. Hyperelastic mechanical behavior of rat brain infected by Plasmodium berghei ANKA-Experimental testing and constitutive modeling. Int J Damage Mech2014; 23: 857–871.
23.
KarimiANavidbakhshMShojaeiA. Measurement of the uniaxial mechanical properties of healthy and atherosclerotic human coronary arteries. Mater Sci Eng: C2013; 33: 2550–2554.
24.
KarimiANavidbakhshM. Constitutive model for numerical analysis of polyvinyl alcohol sponge under different strain rates. J Thermoplastic Composite Mater2014. DOI: 10.1177/0892705713520176.
25.
GloverJ. Prevention of back pain, The Lumbar Spine and Back Pain. New York: Grune & Stratton, Inc, 1976.
26.
GerbeauJ-FVidrascuMFreyP. Fluid–structure interaction in blood flows on geometries based on medical imaging. Comput Struct2005; 83: 155–165.
JohnsonAATezduyarTE. Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Computer Methods Appl Mech Eng1994; 119: 73–94.
AlaghebandMRahmaniSAlizadehM. Hemodynamic investigation of intraluminal thrombus effect on the wall stress in a stented three-layered aortic aneurysm model under pulsatile flow. Artery Res2015; 10: 11–19.
31.
KarimiARahmatiMNavidbakhshM. Mechanical characterization of the rat and mice skin tissues using histostructural and uniaxial data. Bioengineered2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2015.1036202.
32.
FeffermanCL. Existence and smoothness of the Navier–Stokes equation. Millennium Prize Problems2000, pp. 57–67.
33.
GasserTCOgdenRWHolzapfelGA. Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. J R Soc Interface2006; 3: 15–35.
34.
BaratiEHalabianMKarimiA. Numerical evaluation of stenosis location effects on hemodynamics and shear stress through curved artery. J Biomater Tissue Eng2014; 4: 358–366.
35.
FungY-c. Biomechanics: motion, flow, stress, and growth, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990.
36.
KarimiANavidbakhshMRezaeeT. Measurement of the circumferential mechanical properties of the umbilical vein: experimental and numerical analyses. Computer Meth Biomech Biomed Eng2015; 18: 1418–1426.
37.
KarimiAHaghighatnamaMShojaeiA. Measurement of the viscoelastic mechanical properties of the skin tissue under uniaxial loading. Proc IMech Part L: J Mater Design Appl2015. DOI: 1464420715575169.
38.
KarimiANavidbakhshMAlizadehM. A comparative study on the mechanical properties of the umbilical vein and umbilical artery under uniaxial loading. Artery Res2014; 8: 51–56.
39.
KarimiANavidbakhshMShojaeiA. A combination of histological analyses and uniaxial tensile tests to determine the material coefficients of the healthy and atherosclerotic human coronary arteries. Tissue Cell2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2015.01.004.
40.
KarimiAFaturechiRNavidbakhshM. A nonlinear hyperelastic behavior to identify the mechanical properties of rat skin under uniaxial loading. J Mech Med Biol2014; 14: 1450075–1450089.
41.
KarimiANavidbakhshM. Mechanical properties of PVA material for tissue engineering applications. Mater Tech: Adv Perform Mater2013; 29: 90–100.
42.
KarimiANavidbakhshMYamadaH. A comparative study on the quasilinear viscoelastic mechanical properties of the umbilical artery and the umbilical vein. Perfusion2014. DOI: 10.1177/0267659114536761.
43.
OgdenRW. Non-linear elastic deformations, New York: Dover, 1997.
44.
KarimiANavidbakhshM. An experimental study on the mechanical properties of rat brain tissue using different stress–strain definitions. J Mater Sci: Mater Med2014; 25: 1623–1630.
45.
KarimiANavidbakhshMRazaghiR. Plaque and arterial vulnerability investigation in a three-layer atherosclerotic human coronary artery using computational fluid–structure interaction method. J Appl Phys2014; 116: 064701–064710.
46.
KarimiANavidbakhshMMotevalli HaghiA. Measurement of the uniaxial mechanical properties of rat brains infected by Plasmodium berghei ANKA. Proc IMech Eng Part H, J Eng Med2013; 227: 609–614.
47.
KarimiANavidbakhshMRazaghiR. Dynamic finite element simulation of the human head damage mechanics protected by polyvinyl alcohol sponge. Int J Damage Mech2014. DOI: 10.1177/1056789514535945.
48.
KarimiANavidbakhshMYousefiH. An experimental study on the elastic modulus of gelatin hydrogel using different stress-strain definitions. J Thermoplastic Composite Mater2014. DOI: 10.1177/0892705714533377.
49.
FaturechiRKarimiAHashemiSA. Mechanical characterization of peritoneum/fascia under uniaxial loading. J Biomater Tissue Eng2014; 4: 189–193.
50.
KarimiANavidbakhshMHaghiAM. An experimental study on the structural and mechanical properties of polyvinyl alcohol sponge using different stress–strain definitions. Adv Polym Tech2014; 33. : S1. DOI 10.1002/adv.21441.
51.
DoneaJGiulianiSHalleuxJ. An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element method for transient dynamic fluid–structure interactions. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng1982; 33: 689–723.
52.
HalabianMKarimiABeigzadehB. A numerical study on the hemodynamic and shear stress of double aneurysm through s-shaped vessel. Biomed Eng: Appl, Basis Commun2015; 27: 1550033–1550043.
53.
HughesTJLiuWKZimmermannTK. Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng1981; 29: 329–349.
54.
ProsiMPerktoldKSchimaH. Effect of continuous arterial blood flow in patients with rotary cardiac assist device on the washout of a stenosis wake in the carotid bifurcation: A computer simulation study. J Biomech2007; 40: 2236–2243.
55.
Chen HY, Zhu L, Huo Y, et al. Fluid–structure interaction (FSI) modeling in the cardiovascular system. Computational Cardiovascular Mechanics. Munich: Springer, 2010, pp.141–157.
56.
HsuM-CBazilevsY. Blood vessel tissue prestress modeling for vascular fluid–structure interaction simulation. Finite Elements Anal Design2011; 47: 593–559.
57.
ChenHYNaviaJAKassabGS. A simulation of vessel–clamp interaction: transient closure dynamics. Ann Biomed Eng2009; 37: 1772–1780.
58.
TopoleskiLSalunkeNHumphreyJ. Composition‐and history‐dependent radial compressive behavior of human atherosclerotic plaque. J Biomed Mater Res1997; 35: 117–127.
59.
SalunkeNTopoleskiLHumphreyJ. Compressive stress‐relaxation of human atherosclerotic plaque. J Biomed Mater Res2001; 55: 236–241.
