The main purpose of this study was to document the radiation doses to patients during carotid stenting.
Material and method
Fluoroscopy and exposure time, air kerma and dose-area product during carotid artery stenting in 160 patients were retrospectively reviewed with regard to body mass index, degree of stenosis and use of cerebral protection devices.
Results
Total air kerma was lower than 0.5 Gy in 80%, 0.5–1 Gy in 17% and higher than 1 Gy (maximum 1.2) in 3% of patients. Mean total dose-area product value for carotid stenting was 54 Gy cm2. The mean air kerma (fluoroscopy), air kerma (exposure), total air kerma and dose-area product (fluoroscopy), dose-area product (exposure), total dose-area product of patients with body mass index within the range 25–29.9 and with body mass index >30 were significantly increased compared to that of patients with body mass index 18–24.9 (H = 40.2, df = 2; p = 0.0000001 and p = 0.000003, respectively).
Conclusion
Carotid artery stenting is a relatively safe radiological procedure in terms of the radiation dose acquired by the patient. The main factors contributing to possible radiation overdosing are body mass index value and complexity of the carotid lesion. Proper preoperative planning in obese and complicated patients may reduce the fluoroscopy time and contribute to reduced dose acquisition.
KoerningTRWolfDMettlerTA. Skin injuries from floroscopically guided procedure, part 1: characteristics of radiation injury. AJR2001; 177: 3–11.
2.
VanoEGoicoleaJGalvanC. Skin radiation injuries in patients following repeated coronary angioplasty procedures. Br J Radiol2001; 74: 1023–1031.
3.
KocinajDCioppaAAmbrosiniG. Radiation dose exposure during cardiac and peripheral arteries catheterisation. Int J Cardiol2006; 113: 283e4–283e4.
4.
Ad den BoerAde FeijterPSerruysP. Real-time quantification and display of skin radiation during coronary angiography and intervention. Circulation2001; 104: 1779–1784.
5.
AshleighRJHuftonAPRazzaqR. A comparison of bolus chasing and static digital subtraction arteriography in peripheral vascular disease. Br J Radiol2000; 73: 819–824.
6.
BorDSancakTOlgarT. Comparison of effective doses obtained from dose-area product and kerma measurements in interventional radiology. Br J Radiol2004; 77: 315–322.
7.
BorDTokluTOlğarT. Variations of patient doses in interventional examinations at different angiographic units. Cardiovasc Intervention Radiol2006; 29: 797–806.
8.
European Commission. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images. Luxembourg: EUR 16260-EN Office for Official Publication of the European Communities, 1996.
9.
FranssonSGPerslidenJ. Patient radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention. Acta Radiol2000; 41: 142–144.
10.
ZorzettoMBernardiGMorocuttiG. Radiation exposure to patients and operators during diagnostic catheterization and coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn1997; 40: 348–345.
11.
Van de PutteSVerhaegenFTaeymansY. Correlation of patient skin doses in cardiac interventional radiology with dose-area product. Br J Radiol2000; 73: 504–513.
12.
VanoEGonzalezLTenJI. Skin dose and dose-area product values for interventional cardiology procedures. Br J Radiol2001; 74: 48–55.
13.
SteeleHRTempertonDH. Patients doses received during digital substraction angiography. Br J Radiol1993; 66: 452–456.
14.
Broadhead DA, Chapple C-L, Faulkner K, et al. Doses received during intervention procedures. In: Proceedings of the international congress radiation protection, Vien, 1996, pp. 438–440.
15.
McParlandBJ. A study of patient radiation dose in intervention radiological procedures. Br J Radiol1998; 71: 175–185.
16.
EinsteinAJSanzJDellegrottaglie. Radiation dose and cancer risk estimates in 16-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol2008; 15: 232–240.
17.
LeporeMRJrSternberghWCIIISalartashK. Influence of NASCET/ACAS trial eligibility on outcome after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg2001; 34: 581–586.
18.
TheissWLanghoffRSchulteKL. SPACE and EVA-3S: two failed studies?VASA2007; 36: 77–79.
19.
BeckettDGainesPA. Lessons from EVA-3S and SPACE. Cardiovasc Intervention Radiol2008; 31: 5–7.
20.
NaggaraOTouzéEBeyssenB. EVA-3S Investigators. Anatomical and technical factors associated with stroke or death during carotid angioplasty and stenting: results from the endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial and systematic review. Stroke2011; 42: 380–388.
21.
VeithFJParaskevasKI. Influence and critique of CREST and ICSS trials. Semin Vasc Surg2011; 24: 153–156.
22.
VoeksJHHowardGRoubinGS. CREST Investigators. Age and outcomes after carotid stenting and endarterectomy: the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial. Stroke2011; 42: 3484–3490.
FaulknerKLoveHGSweeneyJK. Radiation doses and somatic risk to patients during cardiac radiological procedures. Br J Radiol1986; 59: 359–363.
27.
ICRP. International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 2007 Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Report 103. Ann ICRP2007; 37: 1–332.
28.
ICRP. Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. ICRP Publication 85, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 2000, pp. 30–30.
29.
ZhouW. Radiation exposure of vascular surgery patients beyond endovascular procedure. J Vasc Surg2011; 53: 39S–43S.
30.
WeissDJPipinosJJLangoSM. Direct and indirect measurement of patient radiation exposure during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg2008; 22: 723–729.
31.
JuszkatRBłaszakMAMajewskaN. Dose-area product of patients undergoing digital subtraction angiography (DSA): abdominal aorta and lower limb examinations. Health Phys2009; 96: 113–118.
32.
MajewskaNBłaszakMARMajewskiW. Dose-area product to patients during stent-graft treatment of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Health Phys2009; 97: 206–211.
33.
MajewskaNBłaszakMAJuszkatR. Patients’ radiation doses during implantation of stents in carotid, renal iliac, femoral and popliteal arteries. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2011; 41: 372–377.
34.
MajewskaNStanisicMGBłaszakMA. Clinical factors increasing radiation doses to patients undergoing long-lasting procedures: abdominal stent-graft implantation. Med Sci Monit2011; 17: MT97–MT103.
35.
MajewskaNStanisićMGKłosMA. Patients’ radiation doses during thoracic stent-graft implantation: the problem of long-lasting procedures. Ann Thorac Surg2012; 93: 465–472.
36.
KoenigTRMettlerFAWagnerLK. Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures, part 2: review of 73 cases and recommendations for minimizing dose delivered to patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol2001; 177: 13–20.
