The noun kes, occurring in many syntactic environments, can introduce the so-called pseudocleft constructions in Korean. This paper discusses the animacy asymmetry we find in the Korean pseudocleft constructions and suggests that the explanation for such asymmetry follows from the proper interpretation of specificational pseudocleft constructions as well as their information structure properties.
ChoSungdai, WhitmanJohn, & YanagidaYuko. 2008. Clefts in Japanese and Korean.Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS)44.1:61–77.
2.
ChoeHyon Sook. 2007. On the categorial ambiguity of the morpheme kes in Korean.Language Research43.2:229–264.
3.
ChoiKi Yong. 2011. Kes in the Korean cleft construction: kes filling in an empty NP (in Korean).Studies in Generative Grammar21.1:21–47.
4.
ChungChan, & KimJong-Bok. 2003. Differences between externally and internally headed relative clause constructions.Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG 2002), ed. by KimJong-Bok & WechslerStephen, 3–25. Stanford: CSLI.
5.
den DikkenMarcel. 2005. Specificational copular sentences and pseudoclefts.The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, ed. by EveraertMartin & van RiemsdijkHenk C., 292–409. Oxford: Blackwell.
6.
GeistLjudmila. 2007. Predication and equation in copular sentences: Russian vs. English.Existence: Semantics and Syntax, ed. by ComorovskiIleana & von HeusingerKlaus, 79–105. Dordrecht: Springer.
7.
HeycockCaroline. 1994. The internal structure of small clauses.Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 25), ed. by BeckmanJill, 223–238. Amherst: GLSA.
8.
HeycockCaroline, & KrochAnthony. 1999. Pseudocleft connectedness: implications for the LF interface level.Linguistic Inquiry30.3:365–397.
9.
HeycockCaroline, & KrochAnthony. 2002. Topic, focus, and syntactic representations.Proceedings of the 21st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 21), ed. by MikkelsenLine & PottsChristopher, 101–125. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
10.
HigginsF. Roger. 1979. The Pseudo-cleft Construction in English.New York & London: Garland.
11.
JhangSea-Eun. 1995. Headed Nominalizations in Korean: Relative Clauses, Clefts, and Comparatives.Seoul: Hankwuk Publishers.
12.
KangBosook. 2006. Some peculiarities of Korean kes cleft constructions.Studia Linguistica60.3:251–281.
13.
KearnsKate. 2011. Semantics (2nd edition). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
KimJi-yung, & LeeChungmin. 2008. Why multiple clefts are disallowed.Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 26alic>), ed. by ChangCharles B. & HaynieHannah J., 332–339. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
15.
KimJong-Bok. 2006. Parsing head internal and external relative clause constructions in Korean.Text, Speech and Dialogue: 9th International Conference, TSD 2006, ed. by SojakPetr, KopečekIvan & PalaKarel, 111–117. Berlin: Springer.
16.
KimJong-Bok. 2013. Floated numeral classifiers in Korean: A non-derivational, functional account Floating Quantifiers.Lingua133: 189–212.
17.
KimJong-Bok, BenderEmily, & BondFrancis. 2013. Parsing cleft constructions in Korean: an HPSG approach.Linguistic Research30.3:517–537.
18.
KimJong-Bok, & SellsPeter. 2007. Some remarks on Korean nominalizer kes and information structure.Studies in Generative Grammar17.4:479–494.
19.
KimJong-Bok, & SellsPeter. 2011. On the Korean inferential cleft construction.Studies in Modern Grammar64:45–72.
20.
KimJong-Bok, & YangJaehyung. 2010. Processing three types of Korean cleft constructions in a typed feature structure grammar.Cognitive Science20.1:1–28.
21.
KimMin-Joo. 2009. E-type anaphora and three types of kes-construction in Korean.Natural Language & Linguistic Theory27.2:345–377.
22.
MikkelsenLine. 2005. Copular Clauses: Specification, Predication and Equation.Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
23.
MikkelsenLine.2011. Copular clauses.Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 2, ed. by von HeusingerKlaus, MaienbornClaudia & PortnerPaul, 1805–1829. Berlin: De Gruyter.
24.
ParteeBarbara H.1987. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles.Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, ed. by GroenendijkJeroen, de JonghDick & StokhofM. J. B., 115–143. Dordrecht: Foris.
25.
SharvitYael. 1999. Connectivity in specificational sentences.Natural Language Semantics7.3:299–339.
26.
SohnKeun-Won. 2004. Kes-clefts, connectedness effects, and the implications thereof.Studies in Generative Grammar14.4:561–571.
27.
YoonHang-Jin. 2008. The structure of kes-clefts and the syntactic status of kes in Korean.Studies in Generative Grammar18.3:459–475.
