This brief study examines a number of types of semantic shift and variation in the Formosan languages. Factors behind semantic shift, such as function, shape, and geography, are discussed and exemplified, revealing much semantic variation in Formosan. Cognate sets are analyzed to consider their original semantics.
BloomfieldLeonard1933. Language.New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
2.
BlustRobert1996. Notes on the semantics of proto-Austronesian *-an ‘locative’. Voice in Austronesian, ed. by KlamerMarian1–11. Jakarta: Badan Penyelenggara Seri NUSA, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya.
3.
BlustRobert1999. Subgrouping, circularity and extinction: some issues in Austronesian comparative linguistics. Selected Papers from the Eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, ed. by ZeitounElizabethJen-kuei LiPaul31–94. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
4.
BlustRobert2009. The Austronesian Languages.Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
5.
BlustRobert2010. Five patterns of semantic change in Austronesian languages. A Journey through Austronesian and Papuan Linguistic and Cultural Space: Papers in Honour of Andrew Pawley, ed. by BowdenJohnHimmelmannNikolaus P.RossMalcolm525–546. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
6.
DempwolffOtto1934–1938. Vergleichende Lautlehre des Austronesischen Wortschatzes. Berlin: D. Reimer.
FeyVirginia A.1986. Amis Dictionary.Taipei: The Bible Society.
11.
HeineBernd1997. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar.New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
HoDah-an1978. Wuzhong Paiwan fangyan de chubu bijiao [A preliminary comparative study of five Paiwan dialects]. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica49.4:565–681.
13.
HuangLillian M.1995. The syntactic structure of Wulai and Mayrinax Atayal: a comparison. Bulletin of National Taiwan Normal University40:261–294.
14.
LiPaul Jen-kuei1977. The internal relationships of Rukai. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica48.1:1–92.
15.
LiPaul Jen-kuei1979. Variations in the Tsou dialects. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica50.2:273–300.
16.
LiPaul Jen-kuei1982a. Linguistic variations of different age groups in the Atayalic dialects. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series14.1–2:167–191.
17.
LiPaul Jen-kuei1982b. Male and female forms of speech in the Atayalic group. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica53.2:265–304.
18.
LiPaul Jen-kuei1983. Notes on Thao dialects. Bulletin of the Department of Anthropology National Taiwan University43:48–50.
19.
LiPaul Jen-kuei1988. A comparative study of Bunun dialects. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica59.2:479–508.
20.
LiPaul Jen-kuei1998. The dialectal differences in Atayal in I-Lan. Selected Papers from the Second International Symposium on Languages in Taiwan, ed. by HuangShuanfan49–78. Taipei: Crane.
21.
LiPaul Jen-kueiTsuchidaShigeru2001. Pazih Dictionary. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
22.
LiPaul Jen-kueiTsuchidaShigeru2006. Kavalan Dictionary. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
23.
NihiraYoshiro1988. A Bunun Vocabulary: A Language of Formosa (3rd edition, enlarged). Tokyo(Privately published).
24.
OgawaNaoyoshi1940. Karamian-go to Agotaya-go [The Calamian and Agotaya languages]. Andō Masatsugu Kyōju Kanreki Shukuga Kinen Ronbunshū [Collection of Theses and Essays in Commemoration of the 60th Anniversary of Professor Masatsugu Andō], 1215–1228. Tokyo: Sanseido.
25.
OgawaNaoyoshi2006. A Comparative Vocabulary of Formosan Languages and Dialects, ed. by Jen-kuei LiPaulToyoshimaMasayukiTokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
26.
RauD. Victoria2000. Phonological variation and sound change in Atayal. Oceanic Linguistics39.1:144–156.
27.
ReidLawrence A.1971. Philippine Minor Languages: Word Lists and Phonologies. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
28.
RossMalcolm2009. Proto Austronesian verbal morphology: a reappraisal. Austronesian Historical Linguistics and Culture History: A Festschrift for Robert Blust, ed. by Alexander AdelaarK.PawleyAndrew295–326. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
29.
TengStacy Fang-ching2011. Noun phrase conjunction in three Puyuma dialects. Language and Linguistics12.1:171–204.
30.
TingPang-Hsin1978. Gu Beinanyu de nice [Reconstruction of proto-Puyuma phonology]. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica49.3:321–392.
31.
TsuchidaShigeru1976. Reconstruction of Proto-Tsouic Phonology.Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
32.
TsuchidaShigeruYamadaYukihiroMoriguchiTsunekazu1991. Linguistic Materials of the Formosan Sinicized Populations I: Siraya and Basai. Tokyo: University of Tokyo.
33.
WolffJohn U.2010. Proto-Austronesian Phonology with Glossary. Ithaca: Southeast Asia Program Publications.
34.
ZeitounElizabeth1993. Degrees of grammaticalization in the Rukai dialects: synchronic and diachronic considerations. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Chinese Languages, June 23–25, 1993. Paris, France.
35.
ZengSiqi2008. Taiwan Amisyu Changyong Cizhui yu Dongci Cigen Shouce [A Handbook of Productive Affixes and Verb Roots in Amis]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.