Dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar fusiform aneurysm (DVBFA) presents a clinical challenge due to its complex anatomical features and associated neurological complications. This meta-analysis evaluates the clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT), open surgery, and conservative management for DVBFA.
Methods
A systematic review of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases on July 18, 2024 was conducted to identify studies reporting on radiologically confirmed DVBFAs. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and mortality rates. Meta-regression was performed to identify potential predictors of treatment outcomes.
Results
Ten studies with 219 patients were analyzed. Of the cohort, 58.4% underwent EVT, 24.6% received open surgery, and 16.9% were managed conservatively. The overall proportion of patients achieving a good clinical outcome (mRS < 3) was 46.8%, with EVT showing the highest proportion at 59.4%, compared to 32.3% for open surgery and 24.7% for conservative management (p = 0.0145). The overall mortality rate was 25.98%, with EVT having the lowest mortality rate at 10.06%, followed by open surgery at 44.44% and conservative management at 63.30% (p = 0.0004). Pre- versus post-treatment subgroup analyses, however, did not reveal significant differences between treatment approaches in outcomes.
Conclusion
EVT appears to provide better clinical outcomes for DVBFAs, though mortality rates remain high across all treatment modalities. The absence of significant differences in subgroup analysis suggests the need for further randomized controlled trials of EVT versus conservative management to establish definitive treatment guidelines.
FlemmingKDWiebersDOBrownRD, et al.The natural history of radiographically defined vertebrobasilar nonsaccular intracranial aneurysms. Cerebrovasc Dis2005; 20: 270–279.
2.
Del BruttoVJOrtizJGBillerJ. Intracranial arterial dolichoectasia. Front Neurol2017; 8: 344.
3.
SamimMGoldsteinASchindlerJ, et al.Multimodality imaging of vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia: clinical presentations and imaging Spectrum. RadioGraphics2016; 36: 1129–1146.
4.
SmokerWRPriceMJKeyesWD, et al.High-resolution computed tomography of the basilar artery: 1. Normal size and position. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol1986; 7: 55–60.
5.
PasseroSGRossiS. Natural history of vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia. Neurology2008; 70: 66–72.
LouMCaplanLR. Vertebrobasilar dilatative arteriopathy (dolichoectasia). Ann N Y Acad Sci2010; 1184: 121–133.
8.
NasrDMBrinjikjiWRouchaudA, et al.Imaging characteristics of growing and ruptured vertebrobasilar non-saccular and dolichoectatic aneurysms. Stroke2016; 47: 106–112.
9.
NasrDMFlemmingKDLanzinoG, et al.Natural history of vertebrobasilar dolichoectatic and fusiform aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cerebrovasc Dis2018; 45: 68–77.
10.
PicoFLabreucheJAmarencoP. Pathophysiology, presentation, prognosis, and management of intracranial arterial dolichoectasia. Lancet Neurol2015; 14: 833–845.
11.
SacksJGLindenburgR. Dolicho-ectatic intracranial arteries: symptomatology and pathogenesis of arterial elongation and distention. Johns Hopkins Med J1969; 125: 95–106.
12.
HegedüsK. Ectasia of the basilar artery with special reference to possible pathogenesis. Surg Neurol1985; 24: 463–469.
13.
KobkitsuksakulCSomboonnitipholKApirakkanM, et al.Dolichoectasia of the internal carotid artery terminus, posterior communicating artery, and posterior cerebral artery: the embryonic caudal ramus internal carotid segmental vulnerability legacy. Interv Neuroradiol2020; 26: 711–712.
14.
ShapiroMBecskeTRiinaHA, et al.Non-saccular vertebrobasilar aneurysms and dolichoectasia: a systematic literature review. J Neurointerv Surg2014; 6: 389–393.
15.
WoltersFJRinkelGJEVergouwenMDI. Clinical course and treatment of vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia: a systematic review of the literature. Neurol Res2013; 35: 131–137.
16.
GutierrezJBagciAGardenerH, et al.Dolichoectasia diagnostic methods in a multi-ethnic, stroke-free cohort: results from the northern Manhattan study. J Neuroimaging2014; 24: 226–231.
17.
IkedaKNakamuraYHirayamaT, et al.Cardiovascular risk and neuroradiological profiles in asymptomatic vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia. Cerebrovasc Dis2010; 30: 23–28.
18.
TanakaMSakaguchiMMiwaK, et al.Basilar artery diameter is an independent predictor of incident cardiovascular events. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol2013; 33: 2240–2244.
19.
VasovićLTrandafilovićMJovanovićI, et al.Vertebral and/or basilar dolichoectasia in human adult cadavers. Acta Neurochir (Wien)2012; 154: 1477–1488.
20.
WolfeTUboguEEFernandes-FilhoJA, et al.Predictors of clinical outcome and mortality in vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia diagnosed by magnetic resonance angiography. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2008; 17: 388–393.
21.
InceBPettyGWBrownRD, et al.Dolichoectasia of the intracranial arteries in patients with first ischemic stroke: a population-based study. Neurology[Internet]1998; 50: 1694–1698.
22.
PicoFLabreucheJSeilheanD, et al.Association of small-vessel disease with dilatative arteriopathy of the brain: neuropathologic evidence. Stroke[Internet]2007; 38: 1197–1202.
23.
BogousslavskyJRegliFMaederP, et al.The etiology of posterior circulation infarcts: a prospective study using magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography. Neurology[Internet]1993; 43: 1528–1533.
24.
ParkJ-MKooJ-SKimB-K, et al.Vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia as a risk factor for cerebral microbleeds. Eur J Neurol[Internet]2013; 20: 824–830.
25.
NakajimaMPearceLAOharaN, et al.Vertebrobasilar ectasia in patients with lacunar stroke: the secondary prevention of small subcortical strokes trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis[Internet]2015; 24: 1052–1058.
26.
PicoFLabreucheJTouboulPJ, et al.GENIC Investigators. Intracranial arterial dolichoectasia and its relation with atherosclerosis and stroke subtype. Neurology2003; 61: 1736–1742.
27.
NakamuraYHirayamaTIkedaK. Clinicoradiologic features of vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia in stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis[Internet]2012 [cited 2024 July 17]; 21: 5–10.
28.
PicoFLabreucheJTouboulPJ, et al.Intracranial arterial dolichoectasia and small-vessel disease in stroke patients. Ann Neurol2005; 57: 472–479.
29.
ThijsVGrittnerUFazekasF, et al.Dolichoectasia and small vessel disease in young patients with transient ischemic attack and stroke. Stroke2017; 48: 2361–2367.
30.
ZhaiFFYanSLiML, et al.Intracranial arterial dolichoectasia and stenosis: risk factors and relation to cerebral small vessel disease. Stroke2018; 49: 1135–1140.
31.
RedekopGTerBruggeKWillinskyR. Subarachnoid hemorrhage from vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysm treated with staged bilateral vertebral artery occlusion: the importance of early follow-up angiography: technical case report. Neurosurgery1999; 45: 1258–1262. Discussion 1262–1263.
32.
KwonHMKimJHLimJS, et al.Basilar artery dolichoectasia is associated with paramedian pontine infarction. Cerebrovasc Dis2009; 27: 114–118.
33.
NishizakiTTamakiNTakedaN, et al.Dolichoectatic basilar artery: a review of 23 cases. Stroke1986; 17: 1277–1281.
34.
PasseroSGCalchettiBBartaliniS. Intracranial bleeding in patients with vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia. Stroke2005; 36: 1421–1425.
35.
NakatomiHKiyofujiSOnoH, et al.Giant fusiform and dolichoectatic aneurysms of the basilar trunk and vertebrobasilar junction—clinicopathological and surgical outcome. Neurosurgery2021; 88: 82.
36.
LawtonMTAblaAARutledgeWC, et al.Bypass surgery for the treatment of dolichoectatic basilar trunk aneurysms: a work in progress. Neurosurgery2016; 79: 83.
37.
WuXXuYHongB, et al.Endovascular reconstruction for treatment of vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia: long-term outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2013; 34: 583–588.
38.
HeXDuanCZhangJ, et al.The safety and efficacy of using large woven stents to treat vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia. J Neurointerv Surg2019; 11: 1162–1166.
39.
JiZHeCLiJ, et al.Safety and efficacy of low-profile braided stents versus flow diverters in the reconstructive technique in the treatment of patients with vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysms: a cohort of 47 patients with long-term follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2024; 45: 176–182.
40.
SiddiquiAHMonteiroAHanelRA, et al.Triple therapy versus dual-antiplatelet therapy for dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar fusiform aneurysms treated with flow diverters. J Neurointerv Surg2023; 15: 655–663.
41.
Rezai JahromiBDashtiRRustemiO, et al.Slow-closing clip for the treatment of nonsaccular vertebrobasilar aneurysms: a retrospective case series. World Neurosurg2022; 168: e645–e665.
42.
WangJJiaLYangX, et al.Outcomes in symptomatic patients with vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia following endovascular treatment. Front Neurol[Internet]2019 [cited 2024 Aug 1]; 10: 610.
43.
OtaNMatsukawaHNodaK, et al.Evaluation of microsurgery for managing giant or complex cerebral aneurysms: a retrospective study. World Neurosurg2018; 115: e190–e199.
44.
ZhangHShiMTongX. Treatment of symptomatic dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar aneurysms: a single-center experience with 12 patients. World Neurosurg2018; 119: e407–e416.
45.
SönmezÖBrinjikjiWMuradMH, et al.Deconstructive and reconstructive techniques in treatment of vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Neuroradiol2015; 36: 1293–1298.
46.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J2021; 372: n71.
47.
MarxRGWilsonSMSwiontkowskiMF. Updating the assignment of levels of evidence. JBJS2015; 97: 1.
48.
SterneJACSuttonAJIoannidisJPA, et al.Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. Br Med J2011; 343: d4002.
49.
HigginsJPTThompsonSG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med2002; 21: 1539–1558.
50.
Vivanco-SuarezJRodriguez-CalienesAFarooquiM, et al.Flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms in large-diameter vessels: a subanalysis from the SESSIA study. Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol2023; 3: e000846.
51.
Bin-AlamerOQedairJPalmiscianoP, et al.Dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of management strategies and outcomes. Neurosurg Focus2023 [cited 2024 Aug 23]; 54: E9.
BorotaLNybergCLenellS, et al.Endovascular treatment of type 1 and type 4 non-saccular aneurysms of cerebral arteries—a single-centre experience. Interv Neuroradiol2021; 27: 372–387.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
