Abstract
Background
In 2015, mechanical thrombectomy (MT) was deemed the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in the anterior circulation due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). To determine if outcomes in patients treated with MT have changed, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods
A systematic literature review of the English language literature was conducted using PubMed. We included RCTs that focused on patients with AIS treated with MT. The primary outcome of interest was good functional outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–2 at 90 days. Safety outcomes included rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality at 90 days. Using Joinpoint Regression Analysis Program, we calculated the average annual percent change (AAPC) for the outcomes of interest.
Results
We included 23 RCTs with 5784 patients. The years of mid-enrollment among the included RCTs ranged from 2012–2020. There was an AAPC of +3.82% between 2012 and 2020 (95% CI 0.4 to 7.3; P-value = 0.033) in rates of good functional outcome. There was an AAPC of +6.98% between 2012 and 2020 (95% CI 0.5 to 13.9; P-value = 0.039) in rates of sICH. There was an AAPC of −0.49% between 2012 and 2020 (95% CI −4.4 to 3.5; P-value = 0.77) in rates of mortality.
Conclusion
Between 2012 and 2020, rates of good functional outcome and sICH increased, while rates of mortality remained consistent in RCTs investigating MT for AIS. Multiple factors likely influenced our results, including increased use of MT and utilization of adjunctive therapies alongside MT.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
