Abstract
Background
Endovascular coil embolization (ECE) for intracranial aneurysms has been proven as an effective minimally invasive treatment. However, the aneurysm recanalization after coiling is a serious complication of this technique. Among all the proposed factors associated with recanalization, the impact of packing density (PD) is still controversial.
Objective
To clarify the role of PD in the aneurysm recanalization following ECE, via conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods
A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases, until November 28, 2022, by adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement guidelines. Considering the eligibility criteria, all the studies reporting the outcomes of interest were included. Data elements of interest were extracted and analyzed using R software version 4.2.1.
Results
The pooled analysis of the 17 eligible papers revealed a 29% higher PD of the nonrecanalized aneurysms (ROM = 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18–1.40, p < 0.001), even after removing outlier studies to reduce heterogeneity. However, the pooled estimates from multivariable regression models within nine included studies showed no significant effect of PD on recanalization odds when incorporated into a multivariable model with other predictors (odds ratio [OR] = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.84–1.02, p = 0.126), even after removing outlier studies.
Conclusion
The current literature does not support PD as a significant predictor of aneurysm treatment outcomes, especially with adjusting for other variables. This finding necessitates further prospective multicenter studies with a larger sample size to overcome the current methodological shortcomings.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
