Pipeline embolization of complex,wide-necked middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms: A single-center experience

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the performance of Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) in complex, wide-necked middle cerebral artery (MCA) bifurcation aneurysms.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of patients treated with PED for complex, wide-necked MCA bifurcation aneurysms between August 2016 and March 2021. In addition to demographic data, we collected aneurysmal neck width, dome-to-neck ratio, complications, and clinical and angiographic follow-up. The embolization degree of aneurysms was evaluated by O’Kelly-Marotta (OKM) grading scale, and the prognosis was assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS).

Results

From August 2016 to March 2021, a total of 46 patients with 49 MCA bifurcation aneurysms in our center were enrolled, of whom all received PEDs successfully. The O’Kelly-Marotta (OKM) grading showed that post-procedure 15 patients (32.6%) were grade C, another 8 patients (17.4%) were grade D. Aneurysms with small remnant or complete occlusion were 50%, symptomatic ischemic events occurred in 3 (6.5%), and bleeding events in 1 (2.2%). 41 patients underwent a 6-month angiography follow-up, in which 7 patients (17.1%) remained OKM grade C and 30 patients (73.2%) achieved OKM grade D. Complete occlusion and small remnant aneurysms were up to 90.3%. 40 (97.6%) patients’ mRS scores were 0, and 1 (2.4%) patient was 2. No new bleeding and ischemic events occurred during the 6-month.

Conclusions

The Pipeline Embolization Device provides a safe and effective treatment alternative for complex, wide-necked MCA aneurysms. A larger number with longer-term follow-up data is needed for further verification.

Keywords

Flow diverter pipeline embolization device complex wide-necked middle cerebral artery aneurysms

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Eboli

Ryan

Alexander

, et al. Evolving role of endovascular treatment for MCA bifurcation aneurysms: case series of 184 aneurysms and review of the literature. Neurol Res 2014; 36: 332–338.

Gory

Rouchaud

Saleme

, et al. Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms for 120 nonselected patients: a prospective cohort study. Am J Neuroradiol 2014; 35: 715–720.

Wang

, et al. Morphology parameters for rupture in middle cerebral artery mirror aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2020; 12: 858–861.

Molyneux

Birks

Clarke

, et al. The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT). Lancet (London, England) 2015; 385: 691–697.

Chalouhi

Jabbour

Singhal

, et al. Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: predictors of complications, recanalization, and outcome in 508 cases. Stroke 2013; 44: 1348–1353.

Becske

Brinjikji

Potts

, et al. Long-Term clinical and angiographic outcomes following pipeline embolization device treatment of complex internal carotid artery aneurysms: five-year results of the pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms trial. Neurosurgery 2017; 80: 40–48.

Kan

Sweid

Srivatsan

, et al. Expanding indications for flow diverters: ruptured aneurysms, blister aneurysms, and dissecting aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2020; 86: S96–S103.

Michelozzi

Darcourt

Guenego

, et al. Flow diversion treatment of complex bifurcation aneurysms beyond the circle of willis: complications, aneurysm sac occlusion, reabsorption, recurrence, and jailed branch modification at follow-up. J Neurosurg 2018; 131: 1751–1762.

Bhogal

AlMatter

Bäzner

, et al. Flow diversion for the treatment of MCA bifurcation aneurysms-A single centre experience. Front Neurol 2017; 8: 20.

10.

Becske

Kallmes

Saatci

, et al. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013; 267: 858–868.

11.

Kadkhodayan

Delgado Almandoz

Fease

, et al. Endovascular treatment of 346 middle cerebral artery aneurysms: results of a 16-year single-center experience. Neurosurgery 2015; 76: 54–60; discussion 60–51.

12.

O’kelly

Krings

Fiorella

, et al. A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents. Interv Neuroradiol 2010; 16: 133–137.

13.

John

Bain

Hui

, et al. Long-term follow-up of in-stent stenosis after pipeline flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2016; 78: 862–867.

14.

Bloch

. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988; 19: 1448.

15.

Tayebi Meybodi

Huang

Benet

, et al. Bypass surgery for complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms: an algorithmic approach to revascularization. J Neurosurg 2017; 127: 463–479.

16.

Khorasanizadeh

Ogilvy

. Commentary: safety, efficacy, and durability of stent Plus balloon-assisted coiling for the treatment of wide-necked intracranial bifurcation aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2021; 88: E417–E419.

17.

Poncyljusz

Zwarzany

Limanówka

, et al. Stent-Assisted coiling of unruptured MCA aneurysms using the LVIS Jr. Device: a multicenter registry. J Clin Med 2020; 9: 3168.

18.

Griessenauer

Enriquez-Marulanda

Taussky

, et al. Experience with the pipeline embolization device for posterior circulations aneurysms: a multicenter cohort study. Neurosurgery 2020; 87: 1252–1261.

19.

Diestro

Adeeb

Dibas

, et al. Flow diversion for middle cerebral artery aneurysms: an international cohort study. Neurosurgery 2021; 89: 1112–1121.

20.

Cagnazzo

Mantilla

Lefevre

, et al. Treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with flow-diverter stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Neuroradiol 2017; 38: 2289–2294.

21.

Tomasello

Romero

Aixut

, et al. Endovascular treatment of intracraneal aneurysm with pipeline embolization device: experience in four centres in Barcelona. Neurol Res 2016; 38: 381–388.

22.

Rajah

Narayanan

Rangel-Castilla

. Update on flow diverters for the endovascular management of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurg Focus 2017; 42: E2.

23.

Yavuz

Geyik

Saatci

, et al. Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with flow modification with the use of the pipeline embolization device. Am J Neuroradiol 2014; 35: 529–535.

24.

De Leacy

Fargen

Mascitelli

, et al. Wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery and basilar apex treated by endovascular techniques: a multicentre, core lab adjudicated study evaluating safety and durability of occlusion (BRANCH). J Neurointerv Surg 2019; 11: 31–36.

25.

Lylyk

Scrivano

Lundquist

, et al. Pipeline embolization devices for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, single-center registry: long-term angiographic and clinical outcomes from 1000 aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2021; 89: 443–449.

26.

Briganti

Leone

Cirillo

, et al. Postprocedural, midterm, and long-term results of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow-diverter devices: 7-year experience at a single center. Neurosurg Focus 2017; 42: E3.

27.

Iosif

Mounayer

Yavuz

, et al. Middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms treated by extrasaccular flow diverters: midterm angiographic evolution and clinical outcome. Am J Neuroradiol 2017; 38: 310–316.

28.

Szikora

Berentei

Kulcsar

, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the pipeline embolization device. Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 1139–1147.

29.

Lindgren

Vergouwen

van der Schaaf

, et al. Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 8: CD003085.

30.

Bonney

Connor

Fujii

, et al. Failure of flow diverter therapy: predictors and management strategies. Neurosurgery 2020; 86: S64–S73.

31.

Saleme

Iosif

Ponomarjova

, et al. Flow-diverting stents for intracranial bifurcation aneurysm treatment. Neurosurgery 2014; 75: 623–631; quiz 631.

32.

Monteiro

Lopes

Aghaebrahim

, et al. Optical coherence tomography for elucidation of flow-diversion phenomena: the concept of endothelized mural thrombus behind reversible in-stent stenosis in flow-diverters. Interv Neuroradiol 2021; 27: 774–780.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB