High-quality evidence exists for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation (AC-LVO). The evidence for MT treatment of posterior circulation large vessel occlusion (PC-LVO) is weaker, largely drawn from lower quality studies specific to PC-LVO and extrapolated from findings in AC-LVO, and ambiguous with regards to technical success. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the technical success and functional outcomes of MT in PC-LVO versus AC-LVO patients.
Methods
We identified comparative studies reporting on patients treated with MT in AC-LVO versus PC-LVO. The primary outcome of interest was thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) ≥ 2b. Secondary outcomes included rates of TICI 3, 90-day functional independence, first-pass-effect, average number of passes, and 90-day mortality. A separate random effects model was fit for each outcome measure.
Results
Twenty studies with 12,911 patients, 11,299 (87.5%) in the AC-LVO arm and 1612 (12.5%) in the PC-LVO arm, were included. AC-LVO and PC-LVO patients had comparable rates of successful recanalization [OR = 1.02 [95% CI: 0.79–1.33], p = 0.848). However, the AC-LVO group had greater odds of 90-day functional independence (OR = 1.26 [95% CI: 1.00; 1.59], p = 0.050) and lower odds of 90-day mortality (OR = 0.58 [95% CI: 0.43; 0.79], p = 0.002).
Conclusions
MT achieves similar rates of recanalization with a similar safety profile in PC-LVO and AC-LVO patients. Patients with PC-LVO are less likely to achieve functional independence after MT. Future studies should identify PC-LVO patients who are likely to achieve favourable functional outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PowersWJRabinsteinAAAckersonT, et al.Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke2019; 50: e344–e418.
2.
LangezaalLCMvan der HoevenEMont’AlverneFJA, et al.Endovascular therapy for stroke due to basilar-artery occlusion. N Engl J Med2021; 384: 1910–1920.
3.
LiuXDaiQYeR, et al.Endovascular treatment versus standard medical treatment for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (BEST): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol2020; 19: 115–122.
4.
AbilleiraSCardonaPRibóM, et al.Outcomes of a contemporary cohort of 536 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular therapy. Stroke2014; 45: 1046–1052.
5.
AlawiehAVargasJTurnerRD,et al.Equivalent favorable outcomes possible after thrombectomy for posterior circulation large vessel occlusion compared with the anterior circulation: the MUSC experience. J Neurointerv Surg2018; 10: 735–740.
6.
AlawiehAMEidMAnadaniM, et al.Thrombectomy technique predicts outcome in posterior circulation stroke-insights from the STAR collaboration. Neurosurgery2020; 87: 982–991.
7.
Alonso de LeciñanaMKawiorskiMMXiménez-CarrilloÁ, et al.Mechanical thrombectomy for basilar artery thrombosis: a comparison of outcomes with anterior circulation occlusions. J Neurointerv Surg2017; 9: 1173–1178.
8.
ChuHJTangSCLeeCW,et al.Endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a single-center experience in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc2018; 117: 806–813.
9.
DaouBChalouhiNStarkeRM, et al.Predictors of outcome, complications, and recanalization of the solitaire device: a study of 89 cases. Neurosurgery2015; 77: 355–360. discussion 360–351
10.
FockaertNConinckxMHeyeS, et al.Mechanical endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective multicenter study in Belgium. Acta Neurol Belg2016; 116: 7–14.
11.
HendrixPKiller-OberpfalzerMBroussalisE, et al.Mechanical thrombectomy for anterior versus posterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke with emphasis on posterior circulation outcomes. World Neurosurg2021; S1878-8750(21)01698-3.
12.
HuSYYiHJLeeDH,et al.Effectiveness and safety of mechanical thrombectomy with stent retrievers in basilar artery occlusion: comparison with anterior circulation occlusions. J Korean Neurosurg Soc2017; 60: 635–643.
13.
HuoXRaynaldGaoF, et al.Characteristic and prognosis of acute large vessel occlusion in anterior and posterior circulation after endovascular treatment: the ANGEL registry real world experience. J Thromb Thrombolysis2020; 49: 527–532.
14.
KhouryNNDarsautTEGhostineJ, et al.Endovascular thrombectomy and medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in acute stroke: a randomized care trial. J Neuroradiol2017; 44: 198–202.
15.
LefevrePHLainayCThouantP,et al.Solitaire FR as a first-line device in acute intracerebral occlusion: a single-centre retrospective analysis. J Neuroradiol2014; 41: 80–86.
16.
MeinelTRKaesmacherJChaloulos-IakovidisP, et al.Mechanical thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusion: efficacy, outcomes, and futile recanalization in comparison with the anterior circulation. J Neurointerv Surg2019; 11: 1174–1180.
17.
MourandIBrunelHCostalatV, et al.Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: catch device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2011; 32: 1381–1385.
18.
RenieriLSaiaVPereiraVM, et al.Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with proximal occlusions and low NIHSS: results from a large prospective registry. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2020; 29: 105091.
19.
SerlesWGattringerTMutzenbachS, et al.Endovascular stroke therapy in Austria: a nationwide 1-year experience. Eur J Neurol2016; 23: 906–911.
20.
SinghRKChafaleVALallaRS, et al.Acute ischemic stroke treatment using mechanical thrombectomy: a study of 137 patients. Ann Indian Acad Neurol2017; 20: 211–216.
21.
UnoJKamedaKOtsujiR,et al.Mechanical thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusion compared with anterior circulation stroke. World Neurosurg2020; 134: e469–e475.
22.
WeberRMinnerupJNordmeyerH,et al.Thrombectomy in posterior circulation stroke: differences in procedures and outcome compared to anterior circulation stroke in the prospective multicentre REVASK registry. Eur J Neurol2019; 26: 299–305.
23.
WollenweberFATiedtSAlegianiA, et al.Functional outcome following stroke thrombectomy in clinical practice. Stroke2019; 50: 2500–2506.
24.
ZaidatOOCastonguayACLinfanteI, et al.First pass effect: a new measure for stroke thrombectomy devices. Stroke2018; 49: 660–666.
25.
GrevingJPSchonewilleWJWijmanCA,et al.Predicting outcome after acute basilar artery occlusion based on admission characteristics. Neurology2012; 78: 1058–1063.
SmithWSLevMHEnglishJD, et al.Significance of large vessel intracranial occlusion causing acute ischemic stroke and TIA. Stroke2009; 40: 3834–3840.
28.
DemelSLBroderickJP. Basilar occlusion syndromes: an update. Neurohospitalist2015; 5: 142–150.
29.
PhanKPhanSHuoYR,et al.Outcomes of endovascular treatment of basilar artery occlusion in the stent retriever era: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg2016; 8: 1107–1115.
SchonewilleWJAlgraASerenaJ,et al.Outcome in patients with basilar artery occlusion treated conventionally. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2005; 76: 1238–1241.
32.
LabaugeRPagesMMarty-DoubleC,et al.[Occlusion of the basilar artery. A review with 17 personal cases (author’s transl)]. Rev Neurol (Paris)1981; 137: 545–571.
33.
AdusumilliGPedersonJMHardyN, et al.Endovascular therapy versus medical therapy alone for basilar artery stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis through nested knowledge. Stroke: Vasc Interventional Neurol2022; 2: e000147.
34.
WangFWangJHeQ,et al.Mechanical thrombectomy for posterior circulation occlusion: a comparison of outcomes with the anterior circulation occlusion - A meta-analysis. J Atheroscler Thromb2020; 27: 1325–1339.
35.
MbrohJPoliKTünnerhoffJ, et al.Comparison of risk factors, safety, and efficacy outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy in posterior vs. Anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. Front Neurol2021; 12: 687134.
36.
LeeS-HHanJHJungI,et al.Do thrombolysis outcomes differ between anterior circulation stroke and posterior circulation stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke2020; 15: 849–857.
37.
ZhaoWMaPZhaoW,et al.The safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy in posterior VS. Anterior emergent large vessel occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2020; 29: 104545.
38.
LansbergMGStrakaMKempS, et al.MRI Profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol2012; 11: 860–867.
39.
AlbersGWMarksMPKempS, et al.Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med2018; 378: 708–718.
40.
CeredaCWBiancoGMlynashM, et al.Perfusion imaging predicts favorable outcomes after basilar artery thrombectomy. Ann Neurol2022; 91: 23–32.
41.
CeredaCWBiancoGMlynashM, et al.Perfusion imaging predicts favorable outcomes after basilar artery Thrombectomy. Ann Neurol2022; 91: 23–32.
42.
ViechtbauerW. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw2010; 36: 1–48.
43.
BalduzziSRuckerGSchwarzerG. How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial. Evidence Based Mental Health2019; 22: 153–160.
44.
LuoDWanXLiuJ,et al.Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. Stat Methods Med Res2018; 27: 1785–1805.
45.
WanXWangWLiuJ,et al.Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol2014; 14: 135.
46.
ShiJLuoDWanX,et al.Detecting the skewness of data from the sample size and the five-number summary. arXiv: Methodology2020.
47.
SidikKJonkmanJ. Simple heterogeneity variance estimation for meta-analysis. J R Stat Soc2005; 54: 367–384.
48.
HartungJKnappG. A refined method for the meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials with binary outcome. Stat Med2001; 20: 3875–3889.
49.
IntHoutJIoannidisJPBormGF. The hartung-knapp-sidik-jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-laird method. BMC Med Res Methodol2014; 14: 25.
50.
HigginsJPThompsonSGDeeksJJ,et al.Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J2003; 327: 557–560.
51.
HigginsJThomaJChandlerJ,et al.Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.22021.
52.
RuckerGSchwarzerGCarpenterJ. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes. Stat Med2008; 27: 746–763.
53.
HarrerMCuijpersPFurukawaT,et al.Doing Meta-Analysis with R: a Hands-On Guide. Chapman and Hall/CRC2022.
54.
PedersonJMReiersonNLHardyN, et al.Comparison of balloon guide catheters and standard guide catheters for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg2021; 154: 144–153 e121.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
