The relationship between ultrasonographic plaque morphology and histopathology of embolic material captured in the protective filter during carotid artery stenting

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to correlate the presence or absence of embolic debris in filter-type embolic protection devices (EPD), which are frequently used during carotid artery stenting (CAS), with possible risk factors and ultrasonographic plaque features.

Materials and Methods

Eighty patients, who underwent CAS using a filter-type EPD in the period between July 2016 and March 2019, were included in our study. The modified Gray-Weale classification (mGWC) subtypes obtained in the pre-procedural ultrasonographic examinations were recorded. In addition, other patient-related risk factors considered to be related to a distal embolism were recorded. After the procedure the filters were evaluated to detect and examine embolic debris in the pathology clinic. The presence and features of embolic debris in the filters were recorded.

Results

In the examinations performed after CAS, embolic debris was macroscopically and microscopically detected in 22 (27%) and 34 (42.5%) of the filter-type EPDs, respectively. A significant correlation was found between the change in the mGWC category of stenotic plaques from type 5 to type 1 and the presence of embolic debris in the filter (p < 0.05). Furthermore, a significant relationship was found between stenotic segment length and the presence of embolic debris in the filter (p < 0.05). The presence of embolic debris was not statistically significantly related to predisposing risk factors for atherosclerosis (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

During CAS, the likelihood of the presence of embolic debris in the EPDs increases as mGWC categories change from type 5 to type 1 and as the length of the stenotic segment increases.

Keywords

Carotid artery stenosis atherosclerotic plaque stents embolic protection devices ultrasonography

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ingall

. Stroke--incidence, mortality, morbidity and risk. J Insur Med (New York, N.Y.) 2004; 36: 143–152. Accessed: Dec. 11, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15301227/.

Heiss

Sharrett

Barnes

, et al. Carotid atherosclerosis measured by b-mode ultrasound in populations: associations with cardiovascular risk factors in the aric study. Am J Epidemiol Aug. 1991; 134: 250–256.

Gray-Weale

Graham

Burnett

, et al. Carotid artery atheroma: comparison of preoperative B-mode ultrasound appearance with carotid endarterectomy specimen pathology. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1988; 29: 676–681.

Geroulakos

, et al. Characterization of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid plaques using high-resolution real-time ultrasonography. Br J Surg Oct. 1993; 80: 1274–1277.

Mas

Chatellier

Beyssen

. Carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection: clinical alert from the Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial. Stroke Jan. 2004; 35: e18–e20.

Brown

Rogers

Bland

. Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial. Lancet (London, England) Jun. 2001; 357: 1729–1737.

Ringleb

, et al. 30 Day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet (London, England) Oct. 2006; 368: 1239–1247.

Wholey

, et al. Global experience in cervical carotid artery stent placement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Off J Soc Card Angiogr Interv Jun. 2000; 50: 160–167.

Chaturvedi

Fessler

. Angioplasty and stenting for stroke prevention: good questions that need answers. Neurology Sep. 2002; 59: 664–668.

10.

Angelini

, et al. Cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: collection and histopathologic analysis of embolized debris. Stroke Feb. 2002; 33: 456–461.

11.

Hayashi

, et al. Observation of the embolus protection filter for Carotid Artery Stenting. Surg Neurol Nov. 2009; 72: 532–537; discussion 37.

12.

Massop

, et al. Stenting and angioplasty with protection in patients at high-risk for endarterectomy: SAPPHIRE Worldwide Registry first 2,001 patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Off J Soc Card Angiogr Interv Feb. 2009; 73: 129–136.

13.

Theron

Courtheoux

Alachkar

, et al. New triple coaxial catheter system for carotid angioplasty with cerebral protection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1990; 11: 867–869.

14.

Bonati

, et al. New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS). Lancet Neurol Apr. 2010; 9: 353–362.

15.

Grogan

, et al. B-mode ultrasonographic characterization of carotid atherosclerotic plaques in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. J Vasc Surg Sep. 2005; 42: 435–441.

16.

O’Holleran

Kennelly

McClurken

, et al. Natural history of asymptomatic carotid plaque. Five year follow-up study. Am J Surg Dec. 1987; 154: 659–662.

17.

Mathiesen

Bønaa

Joakimsen

. Echolucent plaques are associated with high risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events in carotid stenosis: the tromsø study. Circulation May 2001; 103: 2171–2175.

18.

Sprouse

II Peeters

Bosiers

. The capture of visible debris by distal cerebral protection filters during carotid artery stenting: is it predictable? J Vasc Surg Jun. 2005; 41: 950–955.

19.

Yang

, et al. A microscopic and biomarker evaluation of embolic filter debris collected during carotid artery stenting. J Endovasc Ther Off J Int Soc Endovasc Spec Apr. 2016; 23: 275–284.

20.

van Laanen

JHH

Hendriks

Verhagen

HJM

, et al. Quantity, particle size, and histologic composition of embolic debris collected in a distal protection filter after carotid angioplasty and stenting: correlation with patient characteristics, timing of carotid artery stenting, and procedural details. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Aug. 2013; 146: 492–495.

21.

Giannakopoulos

, et al. Association between plaque echogenicity and embolic material captured in filter during protected carotid angioplasty and stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Off J Eur Soc Vasc Surg Jun. 2012; 43: 627–631.