Endoluminal flow diverters in the treatment of sidewall and bifurcation aneurysm: A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications and angiographic outcomes
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2022
Endoluminal flow diverters in the treatment of sidewall and bifurcation aneurysm: A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications and angiographic outcomes
The use of endoluminal flow diversion in bifurcation aneurysms has been questioned due to the potential for complications and lower occlusion rates. In this study we assessed outcomes of endovascular treatment of intracranial sidewall and bifurcation aneurysms with flow diverters
Methods
In July 2020, a literature search for all studies utilizing endoluminal flow diverter treatment for sidewall or bifurcation aneurysms was performed. Data were collected from studies that met our inclusion/exclusion criteria by two independent reviewers and confirmed by a third reviewer. Using random-effects meta-analysis the target outcomes including overall complications (hematoma, ischemic events, minor ischemic stroke, aneurysm rupture, side vessel occlusion, stenosis, thrombosis, transient ischemic stroke, and other complications), perioperative complications, and follow-up (long-term) aneurysm occlusion were intestigated.
Results
Overall, we included 35 studies with 1084 patients with 1208 aneurysms. Of these aneurysms, 654 (54.14%) and 554 (45.86%) were classified as sidewall and bifurcation aneurysm, respectively, based on aneurysm location. Sidewall aneurysms had a similar total complication rate (R) of 27.12% (95% CI, 16.56%–41.09%), compared with bifurcation aneurysms (R, 20.40%, 95% CI, 13.24%–30.08%) (p = 0.3527). Follow-up angiographic outcome showed comparable complete occlusion rates for sidewall aneurysms (R 69.49%; 95%CI, 62.41%–75.75%) and bifurcation aneurysms (R 73.99%; 95% CI, 65.05%–81.31%; p = 0.4328).
Conclusions
This meta-analysis of sidewall and bifurcation aneurysms treated with endoluminal flow diverters demonstrated no significant differences in complications or occlusion rates. These data provide new information that can be used as a benchmark for comparison with emerging devices for the treatment of bifurcation aneurysms.
MurayamaYNienYLDuckwilerG, et al.
Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years' experience. J Neurosurg2003;
98: 959–966.
3.
DetmerFJChungBJJimenezC, et al.
Associations of hemodynamics, morphology, and patient characteristics with aneurysm rupture stratified by aneurysm location. Neuroradiology2019;
61: 275–284.
4.
ZhangYTianZJingL, et al.
Bifurcation type and larger low shear area are associated with rupture status of very small intracranial aneurysms. Front Neurol2016;
7: 169.
5.
Valen-SendstadKMardalKASteinmanDA.High-resolution CFD detects high-frequency velocity fluctuations in bifurcation, but not sidewall, aneurysms. J Biomech2013;
46: 402–407.
6.
BaharogluMILauricAGaoBL, et al.
Identification of a dichotomy in morphological predictors of rupture status between sidewall- and bifurcation-type intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg2012;
116: 871–881.
7.
KallmesDFBrinjikjiWCekirgeS, et al.
Safety and efficacy of the pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of 3 large studies. J Neurosurg2017;
127: 775–780.
8.
MarosfoiMClarenconFLanganET, et al.
Acute thrombus formation on phosphorilcholine surface modified flow diverters. J Neurointervent Surg2018;
10: 406–411.
9.
PistocchiSBlancRBartoliniB, et al.
Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke2012;
43: 1032–1038.
10.
PufferRCPianoMLanzinoG, et al.
Treatment of cavernous sinus aneurysms with flow diversion: results in 44 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2014;
35: 948–951.
11.
FiehlerJRiesT.Prevention and treatment of thromboembolism during endovascular aneurysm therapy. Clin Neuroradiol2009;
19: 73–81.
12.
KallmesDFHanelRLopesD, et al.
International retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2015;
36: 108–115.
13.
TahtinenOIManninenHIVanninenRL, et al.
The silk flow-diverting stent in the endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: technical aspects and midterm results in 24 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery2012;
70: 617–623. discussion 23–24.
14.
BrasilienseLBHanelRA.Pipeline embolization device: lessons learned after 1000 aneurysms. World Neurosurg2014;
82: 248–250.
15.
ChiuAHCheungAKWenderothJD, et al.
Long-term follow-up results following elective treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2015;
36: 1728–1734.
16.
KulcsarZHoudartEBonafeA, et al.
Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2011;
32: 20–25.
17.
TurowskiBMachtSKulcsarZ, et al.
Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (SILK-Stent): do we need to rethink our concepts?Neuroradiology2011;
53: 37–41.
18.
CebralJRMutFRaschiM, et al.
Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2011;
32: 27–33.
19.
HamptonTWalshDToliasC, et al.
Mural destabilization after aneurysm treatment with a flow-diverting device: a report of two cases. J Neurointerv Surg2011;
3: 167–171.
20.
MascitelliJRMoyleHOermannEK, et al.
An update to the Raymond-Roy occlusion classification of intracranial aneurysms treated with coil embolization. J Neurointervent Surg2015;
7: 496–502.
21.
O'KellyCJKringsTFiorellaD, et al.
A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents. Interv Neuroradiol2010;
16: 133–137.
22.
EggerMDavey SmithGSchneiderM, et al.
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ1997;
315: 629–634.
23.
HigginsJPThompsonSGDeeksJJ, et al.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ2003;
327: 557–560.
24.
MakalandaHWongKBhogalP.Flow-T stenting with the silk vista baby and baby leo stents for bifurcation aneurysms – a novel endovascular technique. Interv Neuroradiol2020;
26: 68–73.
25.
OishiHTeranishiKYatomiK, et al.
Flow diverter therapy using a pipeline embolization device for 100 unruptured large and giant internal carotid artery aneurysms in a single center in a japanese population. Neurol Med Chir(Tokyo)2018;
58: 461–467.
26.
ChalouhiNDaouBKungD, et al.
Fate of the ophthalmic artery after treatment with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery2015;
77: 581–584. discussion
27.
LinLMIyerRRBenderMT, et al.
Rescue treatment with pipeline embolization for postsurgical clipping recurrences of anterior communicating artery region aneurysms. Interv Neurol2017;
6: 135–146.
28.
Enriquez-MarulandaASalemMMAscanioLC, et al.
No differences in effectiveness and safety between pipeline embolization device and stent-assisted coiling for the treatment of communicating segment internal carotid artery aneurysms. Neuroradiol J2019;
32: 344–352.
29.
BrinjikjiWKallmesDFCloftHJ, et al.
Patency of the anterior choroidal artery after flow-diversion treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2015;
36: 537–541.
30.
MazurMDKilburgCWangV, et al.
Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of vertebral artery aneurysms: the fate of covered branch vessels. J Neurointerv Surg2016;
8: 1041–1047.
31.
CorleyJAZomorodiAGonzalezLF.Treatment of dissecting distal vertebral artery (V4) aneurysms with flow diverters. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)2018;
15: 1–9.
32.
DmytriwAAAdeebNKumarA, et al.
Flow diversion for the treatment of basilar apex aneurysms. Neurosurgery2018;
83: 1298–1305.
33.
NossekEChalifDJChakrabortyS, et al.
Modifying flow in the Ica bifurcation: pipeline deployment from the supraclinoid Ica extending into the M1 segment-clinical and anatomic results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2014;
35: 2125–2129.
34.
CerejoRBainMJohnS, et al.
Flow diverter treatment of cerebral blister aneurysms. Neuroradiology2017;
59: 1285–1290.
35.
ChalouhiNZanatyMTjoumakarisS, et al.
Treatment of blister-like aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery2014;
74: 527–532; discussion 32.
36.
MokinMChineaAPrimianiCT, et al.
Treatment of blood blister aneurysms of the internal carotid artery with flow diversion. J Neurointerv Surg2018;
10: 1074–1078.
37.
CinarCOranIBozkayaH, et al.
Endovascular treatment of ruptured blister-like aneurysms with special reference to the flow-diverting strategy. Neuroradiology2013;
55: 441–447.
38.
AdeebNGriessenauerCJForemanPM, et al.
Comparison of stent-assisted coil embolization and the pipeline embolization device for endovascular treatment of ophthalmic segment aneurysms: a multicenter cohort study. World Neurosurg2017;
105: 206–212.
39.
RoyAKHowardBMHaussenDC, et al.
Reduced efficacy of the pipeline embolization device in the treatment of posterior communicating region aneurysms with fetal posterior cerebral artery configuration. Neurosurgery2018;
82: 695–700.
40.
TanweerORazEBrunswickA, et al.
Cavernous carotid aneurysms in the era of flow diversion: a need to revisit treatment paradigms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2014;
35: 2334–2340.
41.
LanzinoGCrobedduECloftHJ, et al.
Efficacy and safety of flow diversion for paraclinoid aneurysms: a matched-pair analysis compared with standard endovascular approaches. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2012;
33: 2158–2161.
42.
PufferRCKallmesDFCloftHJ, et al.
Patency of the ophthalmic artery after flow diversion treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. J Neurosurg2012;
116: 892–896.
43.
BrasilienseLBCAguilar-SalinasPMillerDA, et al.
Analysis of predictors and probability of aneurysm occlusion in the internal carotid artery after treatment with pipeline embolization device. World Neurosurg2017;
107: 641–648.
44.
ColbyGPBenderMTLinLM, et al.
Endovascular flow diversion for treatment of anterior communicating artery region cerebral aneurysms: a single-center cohort of 50 cases. J NeuroIntervent Surg2017;
9: 679–685.
45.
ZanatyMChalouhiNTjoumakarisSI, et al.
Flow diversion for complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Neuroradiology2014;
56: 381–387.
46.
CaroffJNekiHMihaleaC, et al.
Flow-diverter stents for the treatment of saccular middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2016;
37: 279–284.
47.
GawlitzaMJanuelACTallP, et al.
Flow diversion treatment of complex bifurcation aneurysms beyond the circle of willis: a single-center series with special emphasis on covered cortical branches and perforating arteries. J NeuroIntervent Surg2016;
8: 481–487.
48.
PujariAHowardBMMadaelilTP, et al.
Pipeline embolization device treatment of internal carotid artery terminus aneurysms. J NeuroIntervent Surg2019;
11: 485–488.
49.
YavuzKGeyikSSaatciI, et al.
Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with flow modification with the use of the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2014;
35: 529–535.
50.
DabusGGrossbergJACawleyCM, et al.
Treatment of complex anterior cerebral artery aneurysms with pipeline flow diversion: mid-term results. J Neurointerv Surg2017;
9: 147–151.
51.
RavindranKEnriquez-MarulandaAKanPTM, et al.
Use of flow diversion for the treatment of distal circulation aneurysms: a multicohort study. World Neurosurg2018;
118: e825–e833.
52.
PrimianiCTRenZKanP, et al.
A2, M2, P2 aneurysms and beyond: results of treatment with pipeline embolization device in 65 patients. J Neurointerv Surg2019;
11: 903–907.
53.
LinNLanzinoGLopesDK, et al.
Treatment of distal anterior circulation aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: a US multicenter experience. Neurosurgery2016;
79: 14–22.
54.
LinLMBenderMTColbyGP, et al.
Flow diversion covering the M1 origin as a last resort. Stroke Vasc Neurol2019;
4: 141–147.
55.
DaouBValle-GilerEPChalouhiN, et al.
Patency of the posterior communicating artery following treatment with the pipeline embolization device. J Neurosurg2017;
126: 564–569.
56.
SalemeSIosifCPonomarjovaS, et al.
Flow-diverting stents for intracranial bifurcation aneurysm treatment. Neurosurgery2014;
75: 623–631; quiz 31.
57.
MoonKAlbuquerqueFCDucruetAF, et al.
Treatment of ophthalmic segment carotid aneurysms using the pipeline embolization device: clinical and angiographic follow-up. Neurol Res2014;
36: 344–350.
58.
McLaughlinNMcArthurDLMartinNA.Use of stent-assisted coil embolization for the treatment of wide-necked aneurysms: a systematic review. Surg Neurol Int2013;
4: 43.
59.
BecskeTKallmesDFSaatciI, et al.
Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology2013;
267: 858–868.
60.
LvXYangHLiuP, et al.
Flow-diverter devices in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Neuroradiol J2016;
29: 66–71.
61.
MokinMPrimianiCTRenZ, et al.
Stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms: multi-center analysis of radiographic and clinical outcomes in 659 patients. J Neurointerv Surg2020;
12: 289–297.
62.
ChowMMWooHHMasarykTJ, et al.
A novel endovascular treatment of a wide-necked basilar apex aneurysm by using a Y-configuration, double-stent technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2004;
25: 509–512.
63.
FargenKMMoccoJNealD, et al.
A multicenter study of stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms with a Y configuration. Neurosurgery2013;
73: 466–472.
64.
CagnazzoFLimbucciNNappiniS, et al.
Y-stent-assisted coiling of wide-neck bifurcation intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2019;
40: 122–128.
65.
ArthurASMolyneuxACoonAL, et al.
The safety and effectiveness of the woven EndoBridge (WEB) system for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: final 12-month results of the pivotal WEB intrasaccular therapy (WEB-IT) study. J Neurointerv Surg2019;
11: 924–930.
66.
PierotLMoretJTurjmanF, et al.
WEB treatment of intracranial aneurysms: feasibility, complications, and 1-month safety results with the WEB DL and WEB SL/SLS in the French observatory. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2015;
36: 922–927.
67.
PierotLCostalatVMoretJ, et al.
Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB: results of the WEBCAST study. J Neurosurg2016;
124: 1250–1256.
68.
PierotLGubuczIBuhkJH, et al.
Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with the WEB: results of the WEBCAST 2 study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2017;
38: 1151–1155.
69.
PierotLMoretJBarreauX, et al.
Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of three prospective, multicenter series. J Neurointerv Surg2018;
10: 553–559.
70.
Aguilar-SalinasPBrasilienseLBCWalterCM, et al.
Current status of the PulseRider in the treatment of bifurcation aneurysms: a systematic review. World Neurosurg2018;
115: 288–294.
71.
SpiottaAMChaudryMITurnerRDt, et al.
An update on the adjunctive neurovascular support of wide-neck aneurysm embolization and reconstruction trial: 1-year safety and angiographic results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2018;
39: 848–851.
72.
SorensonTJIacobucciMMuradMH, et al.
The pCONUS bifurcation aneurysm implants for endovascular treatment of adults with intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Surg Neurol Int2019;
10: 24.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
