The best treatment for distal basilar artery aneurysms is controversial. We aimed to review our single-centre experience with coil embolisation of aneurysms at this location and compare it with the surgical and endovascular literature.
Methods
Forty-two aneurysms in a distal basilar location in 42 consecutive patients (15 ruptured and 27 unruptured) were treated endovascularly from 2010 to 2015. Unassisted single and multiple microcatheter coil embolisation alone was used in all cases. We studied our immediate and long-term anatomical results, operative complications, and outcome.
Results
The immediate angiographic results showed complete occlusion in 34 (81%), a neck remnant in seven (16.6%) and a residual aneurysm in one patient (2.4%). There were two thromboembolic events (4.7%) without clinical sequelae; therefore, the operative morbidity and mortality were zero.
Three patients with ruptured aneurysms (7.1%) died due to complicated vasospasm. Thirty-nine patients (93%) had clinical and MR imaging follow-up (mean 32.3 months ± 18.6, range from 12 to 66 months). There was recanalization in 30.8% with a retreatment rate of 15.3% and no new bleedings. The aneurysm size was the most important predictor of early anatomical outcome and recurrence.
Conclusion
Unassisted and multiple microcatheter coiling is a safe treatment for distal basilar aneurysms. Early anatomical results and recurrence depend on the aneurysm size. Morbidity and mortality are lower and recurrence rates are higher in comparison with clipping or other adjunctive endovascular techniques.
HenkesHFischerSMariushiW, et al.
Angiographic and clinical results in 316 coil-treated basilar artery bifurcation aneurysms. J Neurosurg2005;
103: 990–999.
2.
PandeyASKoebbeCRosenwasserRH, et al.
Endovascular coil embolization of ruptured and unruptured posterior circulation aneurysms: review of a 10-yearsexperience. Neurosurgery2007;
60: 626–637.
3.
DrakeCGPeerlessSJHernesniemiJ.Surgery of vertebrobasilar aneurysms: London, Ontario experience on 1767 patients.
New York:
Springer-Verlag, 1996, pp.329.
4.
International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators.Unruptured intracranial aneurysms-risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention [published correction appears in.N Engl J Med1999;
340: 1725–1733.
5.
RinkelGJDjibutiMAlgraA, et al.
Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review. Stroke1998;
29: 251–256.
6.
SekharLNTariqFMortonRP, et al.
Basilar tip aneurysms: a microsurgical and endovascular contemporary series of 100 patients. Neurosurgery2013;
72: 284–299.
7.
LiHPanRWangH, et al.
Clipping versus coiling for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke2013;
44: 29–37.
8.
MolyneuxAJBirksJClarkeA, et al.
The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18-year follow-up of the UK cohort of the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT). Lancet2015;
385: 691–697.
9.
ChalouhiNJabbourPGonzalezLF, et al.
Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of basilar tip aneurysms by coiling with and without stent assistance: a review of 235 cases. Neurosurgery2012;
71: 785–794.
10.
NelsonPKLylykPSzikoraI, et al.
The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2011;
32: 34–40.
11.
BecskeTKallmesDFSaatciI, et al.
Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology2013;
267: 858–868.
12.
RoyDRaymondJBouthillierA, et al.
Endovascular treatment of ophthalmic segment aneurysms with guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol1997;
18: 1207–1215.
13.
DandurandCPrakashSSepehryAA, et al.
Basilar apex aneurysm: case series, systematic review, and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg2020;
138: e183–e190.
14.
LozierAPKimGHSciaccaRR, et al.
Microsurgical treatment of basilar apex aneurysms: perioperative and long-term clinical outcome. Neurosurgery2004;
54: 286–299.
15.
SanaiNTaraporePLeeAC, et al.
The current role of microsurgery for posterior circulation aneurysms: a selective approach in the endovascular era. Neurosurgery2008;
62: 1236–1253.
16.
LusseveldEBrilstraEHNijssenPC, et al.
Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping in patients with a ruptured basilar tip aneurysm. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2002;
73: 591–593.
17.
NandaASonigABanerjeeAD, et al.
Microsurgical management of basilar artery apex aneurysms: a single surgeon's experience from Louisiana State University, Shreveport. World Neurosurg2014;
82: 118–129.
18.
KimCHChoYDJungSC, et al.
Endovascular treatment for superior cerebellar artery aneurysms: morphological features, technique, and outcome. Neuroradiology2014;
56: 647–654.
19.
PelusoJPvan RooijWJSluzewskiM, et al.
Coiling of basilar tip aneurysms: results in 154 consecutive patients with emphasis on recurrent haemorrhage and re-treatment during mid- and long-term follow-up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2008;
79: 706–711.
20.
RoosYBde HaanRJBeenenLF, et al.
Complications and outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a prospective hospital based cohort study in The Netherlands. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2000;
68: 337–341.
21.
MarlinESIkedaDSShawA, et al.
Endovascular treatment of basilar aneurysms. Neurosurg Clin N Am2014;
25: 485–495.
22.
BaxterBWRossoDLownieSP.Double microcatheter technique for detachable coil treatment of large, wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol1998;
19: 1176–1178.
23.
DurstCRStarkeRMGaughenJRJr, et al.
Single-center experience with a dual microcatheter technique for the endovascular treatment of wide-necked aneurysms. J Neurosurg2014;
121: 1093–1101.
24.
TjahjadiMKimTOjarD, et al.
Long-term review of selected basilar-tip aneurysm endovascular techniques in a single institution. Interdiscip Neurosurg2017;
8: 50–56.
25.
KwonOKKimSHKwonBJ, et al.
Endovascular treatment of wide-necked aneurysms by using two microcatheters: techniques and outcomes in 25 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2005;
26: 894–900.
26.
ZhangJZYangPFHuangQH, et al.
Stent-assisted coiling strategies for the treatment of wide-necked basilar artery bifurcation aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci2014;
21: 962–967.
27.
MoretJCognardCWeillA, et al.
The “remodelling technique” in the treatment of wide neck intracranial aneurysms. Angiographic results and clinical follow-up in 56 cases. Interv Neuroradiol1997;
3: 21–35.
28.
ShapiroMBabbJBecskeT, et al.
Safety and efficacy of adjunctive balloon remodeling during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a literature review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2008;
29: 1777–1781.
29.
PierotLCognardCSpelleL, et al.
Safety and efficacy of balloon remodeling technique during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: critical review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2012;
33: 12–15.
30.
SluzewskiMvan RooijWJBeuteGN, et al.
Balloon-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms: incidence, complications, and angiography results. J Neurosurg2006;
105: 396–399.
31.
BrooksNPTurkASNiemannDB, et al.
Frequency of thromboembolic events associated with endovascular aneurysm treatment: retrospective case series. J Neurosurg2008;
108: 1095–1100.
32.
SiddiquiAHAblaAAKanP, et al.
Panacea or problem: flow diverters in the treatment of symptomatic large or giant fusiform vertebrobasilar aneurysms. J Neurosurg2012;
116: 1258–1266.
33.
KulcsárZErnemannUWetzelSG, et al.
High-profile flow diverter (silk) implantation in the basilar artery: efficacy in the treatment of aneurysms and the role of the perforators. Stroke2010;
41: 1690–1696.
34.
ZhouGSuMYinYL, et al.
Complications associated with the use of flow-diverting devices for cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Focus2017;
42: E17.
35.
PhillipsTJWenderothJDPhatourosCC, et al.
Safety of the pipeline embolization device in treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2012;
33: 1225–1231.
36.
WangCBShiWWZhangGX, et al.
Flow diverter treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms. A meta-analysis. Neuroradiology2016;
58: 391–400.
37.
PierotLSpelleLMolyneuxA, et al.; WEBCAST and French Observatory investigators.
Clinical and anatomical follow-up in patients with aneurysms treated with the WEB device: 1-year follow-up report in the cumulated population of 2 prospective, multicenter series (WEBCAST and French observatory). Neurosurgery2016;
78: 133–141.
38.
ZhangSMLiuLXRenPW, et al.
Effectiveness, safety and risk factors of woven EndoBridge device in the treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: systematic review and Meta-analysis. World Neurosurg2020;
136: e1–e23.
