In this report, we present two cases using a novel flow diverter, the Silk Vista Baby, to treat aneurysms successfully, both ruptured and unruptured, that would have been difficult to treat using alternative flow diverters. We describe the clinical and radiological features, outcome and the unique features of the Silk Vista Baby flow diverter.
AugsburgerLFarhatMReymondP, et al. Effect of flow diverter porosity on intraaneurysmal blood flow. Klin Neuroradiol2009; 19: 204–214.
2.
LieberBBStancampianoAPWakhlooAK. Alteration of hemodynamics in aneurysm models by stenting: influence of stent porosity. Ann Biomed Eng1997; 25: 460–469.
3.
KadirvelRDingY-HDaiD, et al. Cellular mechanisms of aneurysm occlusion after treatment with a flow diverter. Radiology2014; 270: 394–399.
4.
GrossBALaiPMRDuR. Impact of aneurysm location on hemorrhage risk. Clin Neurol Neurosurg2014; 123: 78–82.
5.
AlMatterMBhogalPAguilar PérezM, et al. The size of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a 10-year series from a single center. Clin Neuroradiol2019; 29: 125–133.
6.
RahmanMSmietanaJHauckE, et al. Size ratio correlates with intracranial aneurysm rupture status: a prospective study. Stroke2010; 41: 916–920.
7.
KashiwazakiDKurodaS. on behalf of the Sapporo SAH Study Group. Size ratio can highly predict rupture risk in intracranial small (<5 mm) aneurysms. Stroke2013; 44: 2169–2173.
8.
BhogalPBrouwerPASöderqvistÅK, et al. Patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage from vertebrobasilar dissection: treatment with stent-in-stent technique. Neuroradiology2015; 57: 605–614.
9.
BecskeTKallmesDFSaatciI, et al. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology2013; 267: 858–868.
10.
BecskeTBrinjikjiWPottsMB, et al. Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes following pipeline embolization device treatment of complex internal carotid artery aneurysms: five-year results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms Trial. Neurosurgery2017; 80: 40–48.
11.
PuriASMassariFAsaiT, et al. Safety, efficacy, and short-term follow-up of the use of Pipeline Embolization Device in small (<2.5 mm) cerebral vessels for aneurysm treatment: single institution experience. Neuroradiology2016; 58: 267–275.
12.
DabusGGrossbergJACawleyCM, et al. Treatment of complex anterior cerebral artery aneurysms with Pipeline flow diversion: mid-term results. J Neurointerv Surg2017; 9: 147–151.
13.
NossekEZumofenDWSettonA, et al. Treatment of distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. J Clin Neurosci2017; 35: 133–138.
14.
ClarençonFDi MariaFGabrieliJ, et al. Flow diverter stents for the treatment of anterior cerebral artery aneurysms: safety and effectiveness. Clin Neuroradiol2017; 27: 51–56.
15.
BhogalPMartinez MorenoRGanslandtO, et al. Use of flow diverters in the treatment of unruptured saccular aneurysms of the anterior cerebral artery. J Neurointerv Surg2017; 9: 283–289.
16.
ColbyGPBenderMTLinL-M, et al. Endovascular flow diversion for treatment of anterior communicating artery region cerebral aneurysms: a single-center cohort of 50 cases. J Neurointerv Surg2017; 9: 679–685.
17.
BhogalPMartinezRGansladtO, et al. Management of unruptured saccular aneurysms of the m1 segment with flow diversion: a single centre experience. Clin Neuroradiol2018; 28: 209–216.
18.
BhogalPAlMatterMBäznerH, et al. Flow diversion for the treatment of MCA bifurcation aneurysms – a single centre experience. Front Neurol2017; 8: 20.
19.
BrigantiFDelehayeLLeoneG, et al. Flow diverter device for the treatment of small middle cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg2016; 8: 287–294.
20.
PistocchiSBlancRBartoliniB, et al. Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of Willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke2012; 43: 1032–1038.
21.
TopcuogluOMAkgulEDagliogluE, et al. Flow diversion in middle cerebral artery aneurysms: is it really an all-purpose treatment?World Neurosurg2016; 87: 317–327.
22.
CaroffJNekiHMihaleaC, et al. Flow-diverter stents for the treatment of saccular middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2016; 37: 279–284.
23.
IosifCMounayerCYavuzK, et al. Middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms treated by extrasaccular flow diverters: midterm angiographic evolution and clinical outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2017; 38: 310–316.
24.
ZanatyMChalouhiNTjoumakarisSI, et al. Flow diversion for complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Neuroradiology2014; 56: 381–387.
25.
YavuzKGeyikSSaatciI, et al. Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with flow modification with the use of the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2014; 35: 529–535.
26.
CagnazzoFMantillaDLefevreP-H, et al. Treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with flow-diverter stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2017; 38: 2289–2294.
27.
BhogalPChudykJBleiseC, et al. The use of flow diverters to treat aneurysms of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery: report of three cases. Interv Neuroradiol2018; 24: 489–498.
28.
BhogalPChudykJBleiseC, et al. The use of flow diversion in vessels ≤2.5 mm in diameter – a single-center experience. World Neurosurg2018; 118: e575–e583.
29.
RavindranKEnriquez-MarulandaAKanPTM, et al. Use of flow diversion for the treatment of distal circulation aneurysms: a multicohort study. World Neurosurg2018; 118: e825–e833.
30.
YanYZhuDTangH, et al. Safety and efficacy of flow diverter treatment for aneurysm in small cerebral vessels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg2018; 115: 54–64.
31.
ShapiroMRazEBecskeT, et al. Variable porosity of the pipeline embolization device in straight and curved vessels: a guide for optimal deployment strategy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2014; 35: 727–733.
32.
ShapiroMRazEBecskeT, et al. Building multidevice pipeline constructs of favorable metal coverage: a practical guide. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2014; 35: 1556–1561.
33.
MercierPHBrassierGFournierHD, et al. Vascular microanatomy of the pontomedullary junction, posterior inferior cerebellar arteries, and the lateral spinal arteries. Interv Neuroradiol2008; 14: 49–58.
34.
AiharaMNaitoIShimizuT, et al. Predictive factors of medullary infarction after endovascular internal trapping using coils for vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms. J Neurosurg2018; 129: 107–113.
35.
ChoIYHwangS-K. A case of lateral medullary infarction after endovascular trapping of the vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm. J Korean Neurosurg Soc2012; 51: 160–163.
36.
HamasakiOIkawaFHidakaT, et al. Treatment of ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol2014; 20: 304–311.
37.
SönmezÖBrinjikjiWMuradMH, et al. Deconstructive and reconstructive techniques in treatment of vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2015; 36: 1293–1298.
38.
BrouillardAMSunXSiddiquiAH, et al. The use of flow diversion for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: expansion of indications. Cureus2016; 8: e472.
