Cerebral hemodynamics and intracranial aneurysms: Reflecting on pipeline embolization devices

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brunozzi

et al.

Middle cerebral artery pressure changes following Pipeline flow diversion. Interv Neuroradiol 2018; 24(3): 297–302.

Townsend

et al.

Recommendations for improving and standardizing vascular research on arterial stiffness: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension 2015; 66(3): 698–722.

Zheng

et al.

Pulse pressure and mean arterial pressure in relation to ischemic stroke among patients with uncontrolled hypertension in rural areas of China. Stroke 2008; 39(7): 1932–1937.

Weitzman

Goldbourt

. The significance of various blood pressure indices for long-term stroke, coronary heart disease, and all-cause mortality in men: the Israeli Ischemic Heart Disease study. Stroke 2006; 37(2): 358–363.

Hasan

Hindman

Todd

. Pressure changes within the sac of human cerebral aneurysms in response to artificially induced transient increases in systemic blood pressure. Hypertension 2015; 66(2): 324–331.

Tortoriello

Pedrizzetti

. Flow-tissue interaction with compliance mismatch in a model stented artery. J Biomech 2004; 37(1): 1–11.

Crespo

Garcia

Manuel

. Wave reflection at a stent. Proc Inst Mech Eng (H) 2013; 227(1): 72–77.

Morris

et al.

An experimental evaluation of device/arterial wall compliance mismatch for four stent-graft devices and a multi-layer flow modulator device for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2016; 51(1): 44–55.

Alderson

Zamir

. Effects of stent stiffness on local haemodynamics with particular reference to wave reflections. J Biomech 2004; 37(3): 339–348.

10.

Davies

et al.

Attenuation of wave reflection by wave entrapment creates a “horizon effect” in the human aorta. Hypertension 2012; 60(3): 778–785.

11.

Phan

et al.

Misinterpretation of the determinants of elevated forward wave amplitude inflates the role of the proximal aorta. J Am Heart Assoc 2016; 5(2): e003069.

12.

Kerl

et al.

Implantation of pipeline flow-diverting stents reduces aneurysm inflow without relevantly affecting static intra-aneurysmal pressure. Neurosurgery 2014; 74(3): 321–334. discussion 334.

13.

Schneiders

et al.

A flow-diverting stent is not a pressure-diverting stent. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013; 34(1): E1–4.

14.

Larrabide

et al.

Intra-aneurysmal pressure and flow changes induced by flow diverters: relation to aneurysm size and shape. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013; 34(4): 816–822.

15.

Maltete

et al.

Hypertrophic remodeling and increased arterial stiffness in patients with intracranial aneurysms. Atherosclerosis 2010; 211(2): 486–491.

16.

Matsukawa

et al.

Arterial stiffness as a risk factor for cerebral aneurysm. Acta Neurol Scand 2014; 130(6): 394–399.

17.

Dusak

et al.

Arterial distensibility in patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms: is it a predisposing factor for rupture risk?

Med Sci Monit 2013; 19: 703–709.

18.

Moore

Jr Berry

. Fluid and solid mechanical implications of vascular stenting. Ann Biomed Eng 2002; 30(4): 498–508.

19.

Grigioni

et al.

Pulsatile flow and atherogenesis: results from in vivo studies. Int J Artif Organs 2001; 24(11): 784–792.

20.

Vernhet

et al.

Wall mechanics of the stented extracranial carotid artery. Stroke 2003; 34(11): e222–224.

21.

Mitchell

et al.

Arterial stiffness, pressure and flow pulsatility and brain structure and function: the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility–Reykjavik study. Brain 2011; 134(Pt 11): 3398–3407.

22.

Heffernan

et al.

Manipulation of arterial stiffness, wave reflections, and retrograde shear rate in the femoral artery using lower limb external compression. Physiol Rep 2013; 1(2): e00022.

23.

Surovtsova

. Effects of compliance mismatch on blood flow in an artery with endovascular prosthesis. J Biomech 2005; 38(10): 2078–2086.