Entry remnants in flow-diverted aneurysms: Does branch geometry influence aneurysm closure?

Abstract

Objective

Numerous studies have suggested a relationship between delayed occlusion of intracranial aneurysms treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) and the presence of an incorporated branch. However, in some cases, flow diversion may still be the preferred treatment option. This study sought to determine whether geometric factors pertaining to relative size and angulation of branch vessel(s) can be measured in a reliable fashion and whether they are related to occlusion rates.

Methods

Eighty aneurysms treated at a single neurovascular center from November 2008 to June 2014 were identified. Two blinded raters prospectively reviewed the imaging performed at the time of the procedure and measured the following geometric variables: inflow jet/incorporated branch direction angle and branch artery/ parent artery ratio. Delayed occlusion was defined as the absence of complete aneurysmal occlusion at one year. Analysis was performed using logistic regression and intra-class correlation co-efficient (ICC).

Results

Twenty-four (30%) aneurysms with 28 incorporated branches were identified. A trend toward higher inflow jet/incorporated branch direction angle was found in the group of aneurysms demonstrating delayed occlusion when compared to the group with complete occlusion. ICC revealed high correlation. Overall lower one-year occlusion rates of 53% versus 73% for aneurysms with and without incorporated branches, respectively, were also noted.

Conclusions

The presence of an incorporated branch conferred a 20% absolute risk increase for delayed aneurysmal occlusion. Incorporated branches with a larger angle between the inflow jet and the incorporated branch direction exhibited a trend toward lower occlusion rates. This might be further investigated using a multicenter approach in conjunction with other potentially relevant clinical and angiographic variables.

Keywords

Interventional neuroradiology intracranial aneurysm flow diversion neurosurgery Pipeline Embolization Device

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chiu

Cheung

Wenderoth

et al.

Long-term follow-up results following elective treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36: 1728–1734.

Durst

Starke

Clopton

et al.

Endovascular treatment of ophthalmic artery aneurysms: ophthalmic artery patency following flow diversion versus coil embolization. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8: 919–922.

Kan

Duckworth

Puri

et al.

Treatment failure of fetal posterior communicating artery aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8: 945–948.

Breu

A-K

Hauser

T-K

Ebner

et al.

Morphologic and clinical outcome of intracranial aneurysms after treatment using flow diverter devices: mid-term follow-up. Radiol Res Pract 2016; 2016: 2187275.

Caroff

Neki

Mihalea

et al.

Flow-diverter stents for the treatment of saccular middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016; 37: 279–284.

Lylyk

Miranda

Ceratto

et al.

Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009; 64: 632–642. discussion 642–633; quiz N6.

Szikora

Berentei

Marosfoi

et al.

Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline Embolization Device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 1139–1147.

Nelson

Lylyk

Szikora

et al.

The Pipeline Embolization Device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 34–40.

McAuliffe

Wycoco

Rice

et al.

Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33: 164–170.

10.

Saatci

Yavuz

Ozer

et al.

Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33: 1436–1446.

11.

Fischer

Vajda

Perez

et al.

Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology 2012; 54: 369–382.

12.

Kwok

Cheng

et al.

Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of Pipeline Embolization Device – a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology 2012; 265: 893–901.

13.

Deutschmann

Wehrschuetz

Augustin

et al.

Long-term follow-up after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device: results from a single center. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33: 481–486.

14.

O’Kelly

Spears

Chow

et al.

Canadian experience with the Pipeline Embolization Device for repair of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013; 34: 381–387.

15.

Morales

Bonnefous

Geers

et al.

Does arterial flow rate affect the assessment of flow-diverter stent performance?

Am J Neuroradiol 2016; 37: 2293–2298.

16.

Kerl

Boll

Fiebig

et al.

Implantation of pipeline flow-diverting stents reduces aneurysm inflow without relevantly affecting static intra-aneurysmal pressure. Neurosurgery 2014; 74: 321–334.

17.

Shobayashi

Tateshima

Kakizaki

et al.

Intra-aneurysmal hemodynamic alterations by a self-expandable intracranial stent and flow diversion stent: high intra-aneurysmal pressure remains regardless of flow velocity reduction. J Neurointerv Surg 2013; 5: iii38–iii42.

18.

Paliwal

Damiano

Davies

et al.

Association between hemodynamic modifications and clinical outcome of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverters. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 2017; 10135: 101352F.

19.

Park

Mazur

Moon

et al.

An outcomes-based grading scale for the evaluation of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion. J Neurointerv Surg 2017; 9: 1060–1063.

20.

Awad

Mascitelli

Haroun

et al.

Endovascular management of fusiform aneurysms in the posterior circulation: the era of flow diversion. Neurosurg Focus 2017; 42: E14.

21.

Monteith

Tsimpas

Dumont

et al.

Endovascular treatment of fusiform cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. J Neurosurg 2014; 120: 945–954.

22.

De Bock

Iannaccone

De Santis

et al.

Our capricious vessels: the influence of stent design and vessel geometry on the mechanics of intracranial aneurysm stent deployment. J Biomech 2012; 45: 1353–1359.

23.

Gao

Baharoglu

Malek

. Angular remodeling in single stent-assisted coiling displaces and attenuates the flow impingement zone at the neck of intracranial bifurcation aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2013; 72: 739–748.

24.

Bouillot

et al.

Virtual-versus-real implantation of flow diverters: clinical potential and influence of vascular geometry. Am J Neuroradiol 2016; 37: 2079–2086.