Flow-diverting stents (Silk and PED) have radically changed the approach to intracranial aneurysm treatment from the use of endosaccular materials to use of an extraaneurysmal endoluminal device.
However, much debate surrounds the most appropriate indications for the use of FD stents and the problems raised by several possible complications.
We analysed our technical difficulties and the early (less than ten days after treatment) and late complications encountered in 30 aneurysms treated comprising 13 giant lesions, 12 large, five with maximum diameters <10 mm and one blister-like aneurysm.
In our experience the primary indications for the use of FD stents can be the symptomatic intracavernous giant aneurysms. Although the extracavernous carotid siphon aneurysms have major risk of bleeding, FD stents are indicated clearly explaining the risks to the patient in case of severe mass effect. There is a very complex assessment for aneurysms of the vertebrobasilar circulation.
AugsburgerLFarhatMReymondP. Effect of flow diverter porosity on intraaneurysmal blood flow. Klin Neuroradiol. 2009;19: 204–214.
2.
AurboonyawatTBlancRSchmidtP. An in vitro study of silk stent morphology. Neuroradiology. 2010; 53: 659–667.
3.
BodilyKDCloftHJLanzinoG. Stent-assisted coiling in acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a qualitative, systematic review of the literature. Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; 32: 1232–1236.
4.
ByrneJVBeltechiRYarnoldJA. Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLoS One.2010; 2: 5 (9).
5.
CebralJRMutFRaschiM. Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; 32: 27–33.
6.
CirilloLDall'OlioMPrinciottaC. The use of flow-diverting stents in the treatment of giant cerebral aneurysms: preliminary results. Neuroradiol J.2010; 23: 220–224.
7.
CloftHJ. Flow diversion for cerebral aneurysms: a cautionary tale. Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; 32: 26.
8.
FiorellaDKellyMEAlbuquerqueFC. Curative reconstruction of a giant midbasilar trunk aneurysm with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery. 2009; 64: 212–217.
9.
FiorellaDLylykPSzikoraI. Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2009; 1: 56–65.
10.
FiorellaDSadasivanCWooHH. Regarding “aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment”. Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; 32: E95–E97.
11.
FiorellaDWooHHAlbuquerqueFC. Definitive reconstruction of circumferential, fusiform intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery. 2008; 62: 1115–1120.
12.
WongGKKwanMCNgRY. Flow diverters for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Current status and ongoing clinical trials. J Clin Neurosci. 2011; 18: 737–740.
13.
HassanTAhmedYMHassanAA. The adverse effects of flow-diverter stent-like devices on the flow pattern of saccular intracranial aneurysm models: computational fluid dynamics study. Acta Neurochir. 2011; 153: 1633–1640.
14.
KlischJTurkATurnerR. Very late thrombosis of flow-diverting constructs after the treatment of large fusiform posterior circulation aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; 32: 627–632.
15.
KulcsárZErnemannUWetzelSG. High-profile flow diverter (silk) implantation in the basilar artery: efficacy in the treatment of aneurysms and the role of the perforators. Stroke. 2010; 41: 1690–1696.
16.
KulcsárZHoudartEBonaféA. Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; 32: 20–25.
17.
KulcsárZWetzelSGAugsburgerL. Effect of flow diversion treatment on very small ruptured aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2010; 67: 789–793.
18.
LeonardiMCirilloLToniF. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using flow-diverting silk stents (BALT): a single centre experience. Interv Neuroradiol. 2011; 17: 306–315.
19.
LubiczBCollignonLRaphaeliG. Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke. 2010; 41: 2247–2253.
20.
LylykPMirandaCCerattoR. Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery. 2009; 64: 632–642.
21.
NelsonPKLylykPSzikoraI. The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; 32: 34–40.
22.
PierotLCognardCSpelleL. Safety and efficacy of balloon remodeling technique during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: critical review of the literature. Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; 33: 12–15.
23.
PrinciottaCDall'OlioMCirilloL. Staged treatment of a blister-like aneurysm with stent assisted coiling followed by flow diverter in-stent insertion. A case report. Interv Neuroradiol. 2011; 17: 365–370.
24.
PumarJMCastineiraJAVazquezF. Exclusion of a cavernous aneurysm by Leo stent. Intervent Neuroradiol. 2006; 12: 57–60.
25.
SadasivanCCesarLSeongJ. An original flow diversion device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation in the rabbit elastase-induced model. Stroke. 2009; 40: 952–958.
26.
ToniFMarlianiAFCirilloL. 3T MRI in the evaluation of brain aneurysms treated with flow-diverting stents: preliminary experience. Neuroradiol J.2009; 22: 588–599.
27.
TurowskiBMachtSKulcsàrZ. Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (Silk-Stent): Do we need to rethink our concepts?Neuroradiology. 2011; 53: 37–41.
28.
van RooijWJSluzewskiM. Perforator Infarction after Placement of a Pipeline Flow-Diverting Stent for an Unruptured A1 aneurysm. Am J Neuroradiol. 2010; 31: E43–E44.
29.
WalcottBPPisapiaJMNahedBV. Early experience with flow diverting endoluminal stents for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci. 2011; 18: 891–894.
