The Principle of Digital Subtraction Angiography and Radiological Protection

Abstract

Recent improvements in x-ray technology have greatly contributed to the advancement of diagnostic imaging. Fluoroscopically guided neurointerventional procedures with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) are being performed with increasing frequency as the treatment of choice for a variety of neurovascular diseases. Radiation-induced skin injuries can occur after extended fluoroscopic exposure times, and the injuries have recently been reported. In this article, measured radiation doses at the surface of Rando Phantom with Skin Dose Monitor, and estimated and measured entrance skin doses in patients underwent neurointerventional procedures are reported as well as means of reducing radiation doses absorbed by patients and personnel to avoid occurrence of radiation-induced injuries.

Keywords

fluoroscopically guided interventional procedure digital subtraction angiography radiation protection

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Huda

Peters

: Radiation-induced temporary epilation after a neuroradiologically guided embolization procedure. Radiology 193: 642–644, 1994.

Shope

: Radiation-induced skin injuries from fluoroscopy. RadioGraphics 16: 1195–1199, 1996.

Kuwayama

Takaku

: Radiation exposure in endovascular surgery of the head and neck. Am J Neuroradiol 15: 1801–1808, 1994.

Norbash

Busick

: Techniques for reducing interventional neuroradiologic skin dose: Tube position rotation and supplemental beam filtration. Am J Neuroradiol 17: 41–49, 1996.

Brateman

: The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents, radiation safety considerations for diagnostic radiology personnel. RadioGraphics 19: 1037–1055, 1999.

Dowd

: Fluoroscopy: Viewing motion with x-ray. In: Thompson

Hall

(eds): Principles of imaging science and protection. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia 1994: 361–376.

Ovitt

Newell

II : Digital Subtraction Angiography: Technology, equipment, and techniques. Radiologic Clinics of North America 23: 177–184, 1985.

United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR): Source, effects and risks of ionizing radiation: Report to the General Assembly. United Nations, New York 1988.

Hall

: Radiobiology for the radiologist. 4th ed. J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia 1994: 379–384.

10.

Bergeron

Carier

: Radiation doses to patients in neurointerventional procedures. Am J Neuroradiol 15: 1809–1812, 1994.

11.

Bushong

: Hazards evaluation of neuroangiographic procedures: Am J Neuroradiol 15: 1813–1816, 1994.

12.

Yaffe

Mawdsley

: Composite materials for x-ray protection. Health Phys 60: 661–664, 1991.

13.

Aufrichtig

Xue

: Perceptual comparison of pulsed and continuous fluoroscopy. Med Phys 21: 245–256, 1994.

14.

Hattaway

: Improving image quality. In: Thompson

Hall

(eds): Principles of imaging science and protection. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia 1994: 309–340.

15.

Thompson

: Factors affecting the x-ray spectrum. In: Thompson

Hall

(eds): Principles of imaging science and protection. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia 1994: 221–234.

16.

Kumar

Good

: Radiation-induced neoplasms of the brain. Cancer 19: 1274–1282, 1987.

17.

Gomori

Shaked

: Radiation induced meningiomas. Neuroradiology 23: 211–212, 1982.

18.

Soffer

Pittaluga

: Intracranial meningiomas following low-dose irradiation to the head. J Neurosurg 59: 1048–1053, 1983.