The traditional approach to ontology development is characterized by its labor-intensive nature, requiring extensive effort and domain expertise to define intricate structures, relationships, and concepts accurately. This study proposes a paradigm shift in ontology development by harnessing the capabilities of large language models (LLMs). This methodology entails the creation of an interactive interface that empowers users to query LLMs using prompts, facilitating the retrieval of pertinent information with ease. Subsequent analysis of this information allows for identifying key relationships, which are then transformed into graph structures using the Web Ontology Language (OWL). The outcome of this process is OLIVE—an ontology development workflow engineered to streamline manual efforts and minimize the risk of errors.
Babaei GiglouH.D’SouzaJ.AuerS. (2023). LLMs4OL: Large Language Models for Ontology Learning. In International Semantic Web Conference (pp. 408–27). Springer.
2.
CaufieldJ. H.HegdeH.EmonetV.HarrisN. L.JoachimiakM. P.MatentzogluN., KimH. S.MoxonS.ReeseJ.T.HaendelM. A.RobinsonP. N.MungallC. J. (2024). Structured prompt interrogation and recursive extraction of semantics (SPIRES): A method for populating knowledge bases using zero-shot learning. Bioinformatics, 40(3), btae104. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btae104
3.
Fernández-LópezM.Gómez-PérezA. (2002). Overview and analysis of methodologies for building ontologies. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 17(2), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888902000462
4.
FunkM.HosemannS.JungJ. C.LutzC. (2023). Towards Ontology Construction with Language Models. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2309.09898.
5.
GennariJ. H.MusenM. A.FergersonR. W.GrossoW. E.CrubézyM.ErikssonH.NoyN. F.TuS. W. (2003). The evolution of protégé: An environment for knowledge-based systems development. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(1), 89–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(02)00127-1
6.
HuangL.YuW.MaW.ZhongW.FengZ.WangH.ChenQ., et al. (2023). A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2311.05232.
7.
KinneyR. M.AnastasiadesC.AuthurR.BeltagyI.BraggJ.BuraczynskiA.CacholaI., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. ArXiv abs/2301.10140. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:256194545.
8.
Küçük McGintyH.VisserU.SchürerS. (2019). How to develop a drug target ontology: KNowledge acquisition and representation methodology (KNARM). Bioinformatics and Drug Discovery, 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9089-4_4
9.
LinY.MehtaS.Küçük-McGintyH.TurnerJ. P.VidovicD.ForlinM.KoletiA., et al. (2017). Drug target ontology to classify and integrate drug discovery data. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 8, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13326-017-0161-x
10.
LohmannS.LinkV.MarbachE.NegruS. (2015). WebVOWL: Web-based visualization of ontologies. In Knowledge engineering and knowledge management: EKAW 2014 Satellite Events, VISUAL, EKM1, and ARCOE-Logic, Linköping, Sweden, November 24–28, 2014. Revised Selected Papers 19 (pp. 154–58). Springer.
11.
McGintyK. (n.d.). Knowledge-graph integration of food products on the USDA’s Food Data Central (FDC) using KARMA (Knowledge Acquisition and Representation Methodology (KNARM) and Its Application) for connecting it to global food systems’ component. In preparation.
12.
MeyerL.-P.StadlerC.FreyJ.RadtkeN.JunghannsK.MeissnerR.DziwisG.BulertK.MartinM. (2023). LLM-assisted knowledge graph engineering: Experiments with ChatGPT. In Working conference on artificial intelligence development for a resilient and sustainable tomorrow (pp. 103–15). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
PanJ. Z.RazniewskiS.KaloJ.-C.SinghaniaS.ChenJ.DietzeS.JabeenH., et al. (2023). Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: Opportunities and Challenges. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2308.06374.
15.
PeroniS. (2017). A Simplified agile methodology for ontology development. In OWL: Experiences and directions–reasoner evaluation: 13th International Workshop, OWLED 2016, and 5th International Workshop, ORE 2016, Bologna, Italy, November 20, 2016, Revised Selected Papers 13 (pp. 55–69). Springer.
16.
PintoH. S.TempichC.StaabS. (2009). Ontology engineering and evolution in a distributed world using DILIGENT. Handbook on Ontologies, 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_7
17.
Poveda-VillalónM.Gómez-PérezA.Suárez-FigueroaM. C. (2014). OOPS! (OntOlogy pitfall scanner!): An on-line tool for ontology evaluation. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 10(2), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijswis.2014040102
18.
SequedaJ. F.BriggsW. J.MirankerD. P.HeidemanW. P. (2019). A pay-as-you-go methodology to design and build enterprise knowledge graphs from relational databases.” In The Semantic Web–ISWC 2019: 18th international semantic web conference, Auckland, New Zealand, October 26–30, 2019, Proceedings, Part II 18 (pp. 526–45). Springer.
TouvronH.LavrilT.IzacardG.MartinetX.LachauxM.-A.LacroixT.RozièreB., et al. (2023). LLaMA: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2302.13971. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13971.
21.
TrajanoskaM.StojanovR.TrajanovD. (2023). Enhancing knowledge graph construction using large language models. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2305.04676.
