This paper explores the power dynamics in digital backbone infrastructure in Norway, focusing on the diversity of actors involved. The digital backbone infrastructure includes tangible items like satellites, data centers, content delivery networks, and underwater cables. The handling of sensitive data and threats to national security may escalate if this vital infrastructure is not regulated, controlled, and coordinated. Given the intricate relationships between global market participants, international policy, and national agendas, the study emphasizes the necessity of paying more attention to the governance of digital backbone infrastructure in the future. The study found that the Norwegian government has solid control over subsea Internet cables and IXPs, while private international actors dominate ownership of data centers and CDN'S. The study also found that metagovernance strategies influence power relations in the infrastructure. The emergence of these strategies could strengthen stability and flexibility in the state's role in this growing industry and policy field. The study highlights the importance of monitoring digital backbone infrastructure, fostering collaboration between market and state, and developing clear regulations and collaboration arenas. It also emphasizes the need for combining knowledge from different disciplines and exploring the concept of metagovernance in digital infrastructure to avoid “lagging behind” in its development.
Abelia (2023). Et døgn uten internet - datasentrenes funksjon i vårt digitale samfunn. [A day without internet: The function of datacentres in our digital society]. Abelia.
2.
AnsellC.TorfingJ. (2022). Handbook on theories of governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.
3.
BowenG. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
4.
ChristensenT.LægreidP. (2022). ICT Use in central government: Scope, predictors and effects on coordination quality. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(3), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1851256
5.
ChristopoulosS.DemirC.KullM. (2016). Cross-sectoral coordination for sustainable solutions in Croatia: The (meta) governance of energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 99, 57–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.010
6.
CoutureS.ToupinS. (2019). What does the notion of “sovereignty” mean when referring to the digital?New Media & Society, 21(10), 2305–2322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819865984
7.
DawesS. S. (2009). Governance in the digital age: A research and action framework for an uncertain future. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.003
8.
De ReuverM.SørensenC.BasoleR. C. (2018). The digital platform: A research agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 33(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3
9.
European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. (2017). Trust at risk: Implications for EU policies and institutions. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/364327
10.
FlensburgS.LaiS. S. (2020). Mapping digital communication systems: Infrastructures, markets, and policies as regulatory forces. Media, Culture & Society, 42(5), 692–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719876533
11.
FlensburgS.LaiS. S. (2021). Networks of power: Analysing the evolution of the danish internet infrastructure. Internet Histories, 5(2), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701475.2020.1759010
12.
FlensburgS.LaiS. S. (2023). Follow the data! A Strategy for tracing infrastructural power. Media and Communication, 11(2), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6464
13.
Gil-GarciaJ. R.DawesS. S.PardoT. A. (2018). Digital government and public management research: Finding the crossroads. Public Management Review, 20(5), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181
14.
HelmondA.NieborgD. B.van der VlistF. N. (2019). Facebook’s evolution: Development of a platform-as-infrastructure. Internet Histories, 3(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701475.2019.1593667
15.
HesmondhalghD.ValverdeR. C.KayeD. B. V.LiZ. (2023). Digital platforms and infrastructure in the realm of culture. Media and Communication, 11(2), 296–306. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6422
16.
HintzA.DencikL.Wahl-JorgensenK. (2017). Digital citizenship and surveillance| digital citizenship and surveillance society—introduction. International Journal of Communication, 11, 731–739.
17.
HuangY.MayerM. (2022). Power in the age of datafication: Exploring China’s global data power. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 28, 25–49.
18.
HuxhamC.VangenS. (2013). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routledge.
19.
Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet. (2023). Norge får sin første lov om digital sikkerhet - regjeringen.no.
KöhlerJ.GeelsF. W.KernF.MarkardJ.OnsongoE.WieczorekA.AlkemadeF.AvelinoF.BergekA.BoonsF.FünfschillingL.HessD.HoltzG.HyysaloS.JenkinsK.KivimaaP.MartiskainenM.McMeekinA.MühlemeierM. S., …, WellsP. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
23.
KooimanJ.BavinckM.ChuenpagdeeR.MahonR.PullinR. (2008). Interactive governance and governability: an introduction. The journal of transdisciplinary environmental studies, 7, 1–11.
24.
KooimanJ.JentoftS. (2009). Meta-governance: Values, norms and principles, and the making of hard choices. Public Administration, 87(4), 818–836. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01780.x
25.
KrämerJ.WohlfarthM. (2018). Market power, regulatory convergence, and the role of data in digital markets. Telecommunications Policy, 42(2), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.10.004
26.
LeonhardtR.NobleB.PoelzerG.FitzpatrickP.BelcherK.HoldmannG. (2022). Advancing local energy transitions: A global review of government instruments supporting community energy. Energy Research & Social Science, 83, 102350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102350
27.
LipsM. (2020). Digital government: Managing public sector reform in the digital era. Routledge.
28.
MalodiaS.DhirA.MishraM.BhattiZ. A. (2021). Future of e-government: An integrated conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121102, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121102
MeijerA.BekkersV. (2015). A metatheory of e-government: Creating some order in a fragmented research field. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.04.006
MergelI.GongY.BertotJ. (2018). Agile government: Systematic literature review and future research. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.04.003
MusianiF. (2020). Science and technology studies approaches to internet governance: Controversies and infrastructures as internet politics. In DeNardisL.CogburnD.LevinsonN. S.MusianiF. (Eds.), Researching internet governance: Methods, frameworks, futures (pp. 85–104). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12400.003.0005
Pahl-WostlC. (2015). Water Governance in the Face of Global Change - From Understanding to Transformation. Springer International Publishing.
39.
Pahl-WostlC. (2019). The role of governance modes and meta-governance in the transformation towards sustainable water governance. Environmental Science & Policy, 91, 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.10.008
40.
Pahl-WostlC.BhaduriA.BrunsA. (2018). Editorial special issue: The Nexus of water, energy and food – An environmental governance perspective. Environmental Science & Policy, 90, 161–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.06.021
41.
ParksL.StarosielskiN. (Eds.). (2015). Signal traffic: Critical studies of media infrastructures (pp. 335–373). University of Illinois Press.
42.
ParmiggianiE.MikalefP. (2022). The case of Norway and digital transformation over the years. In MikalefP.ParmiggianiE. (Eds.), Digital transformation in Norwegian enterprises (pp. 11–18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05276-7_2
43.
PetersB. G.PierreJ.SørensenE.TorfingJ. (2022). Bringing political science back into public administration research. Governance, 35(4), 962–982. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.v35.4
44.
PlantinJ.-C.LagozeC.EdwardsP. N.SandvigC. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20(1), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553
45.
PlantinJ.-C.PunathambekarA. (2019). Digital media infrastructures: Pipes, platforms, and politics. Media, Culture & Society, 41(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718818376
SjøvaagH.Ferrer-ConillR. (2024). Digital communications infrastructures and the principle of universality: Challenges for nordic media welfare state jurisdictions. In JakobssonP.StiernstedtF. (Eds.), The future of the nordic media model: A digital media welfare state? (pp. 201–222). Nordicom.
50.
SoininenN.RomppanenS.HuhtaK.BelinskijA. (2021). A brake or an accelerator? The role of law in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 41, 71–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.09.012
51.
SørensenE.TorfingJ. (2017). Metagoverning collaborative innovation in governance networks. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(7), 826–839. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016643181
52.
StarS. L.RuhlederK. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information System Research, 7(1), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.111
53.
TerlizziA. (2021). The digitalization of the public sector: A systematic literature review. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 16(1), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1483/100372
54.
TorfingJ.TriantafillouP. (2011). Introduction: Interactive policy making, metagovernance and democracy. In Interactive policy making, metagovernance and democracy (pp. 1–25). ECPR Press.
55.
Van VeelenB. (2018). Negotiating energy democracy in practice: governance processes in community energy projects. Environmental Politics, 27(4), 644–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1427824
56.
WinnerL. (1986). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. University of Chicago Press.
