This study analyzes how disaster types and research and development (R & D) characteristics play a different role in citizens’ risk perception based on 1,000 Korean citizens in 2021 by employing a partial least square (PLS) regression. This study finds that R & D play the most important role in citizens’ risk perception. For example, the development of R & D shows very high importance with values of 1.355 for interest and 1.817 for severity. Next, social disasters and safety accidents exert a meaningful impact on citizens’ risk perception, whereas natural disasters do not influence them. For instance, traffic accidents are slightly important with a value of 0.700, and leisure accidents are moderately important with a value of 0.928 for severity. Third, socio-demographic variables show a moderate effect on citizens’ risk perception. For example, age shows values of 0.719 for interest and 0.816 for severity. This study suggests that governments should increase interest and severity of citizens according to R & D, disaster types, and socio-demographic characteristics.
AbdiH. (2003). Partial least square regression (PLS regression). Encyclopedia for Research Methods for the Social Sciences, 6(4), 792–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_1274
2.
AlQahtanyA. M.AbubakarI. R. (2020). Public perception and attitudes to disaster risks in a coastal metropolis of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 44, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101422
3.
AlvesP. B. R.CordaoM. J. D. S.DjordjevićS.JavadiA. A. (2020). Place-based citizen science for assessing risk perception and coping capacity of households affected by multiple hazards. Sustainability, 13(1), 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010302
4.
AnyanF.HjemdalO.ErnstsenL.HavnenA. (2020). Change in physical activity during the coronavirus disease 2019 lockdown in Norway: The buffering effect of resilience on mental health. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 598481. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.598481
5.
ArdayaA. B.EversM.RibbeL. (2017). What influences disaster risk perception? Intervention measures, flood and landslide risk perception of the population living in flood risk areas in Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 25, 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.006
6.
BastienS. (2008). Out-of-school and ‘at risk’?: Socio-demographic characteristics, AIDS knowledge and risk perception among young people in Northern Tanzania. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(4), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2007.11.005
BosschaartA.KuiperW.van der ScheeJ.SchoonenboomJ. (2013). The role of knowledge in students’ flood-risk perception. Natural Hazards, 69, 1661–1680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0774-z
9.
BowmanF. D.GuoY.DeradoG. (2007). Statistical approaches to functional neuroimaging data. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America, 17(4), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2007.09.002
10.
BronfmanN. C.CisternasP. C.López-VázquezE.CifuentesL. A. (2016). Trust and risk perception of natural hazards: Implications for risk preparedness in Chile. Natural Hazards, 81, 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2080-4
11.
ChanE. Y. Y.HuangZ.LoE. S. K.HungK. K. C.WongE. L. Y.WongS. Y. S. (2020). Sociodemographic predictors of health risk perception, attitude and behavior practices associated with health-emergency disaster risk management for biological hazards: The case of COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong, SAR China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 3869. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113869
12.
ChungW. H.NohG. O. (2021). The influence of disaster safety awareness on the safety competency of college students. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(13), 5883–5888. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i13.9859
CuestaA.AlvearD.CarnevaleA.AmonF. (2022). Gender and public perception of disasters: A multiple hazards exploratory study of EU citizens. Safety, 8(3), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety8030059
15.
CvetkovićV. M.PlanićJ. (2022). Earthquake risk perception in Belgrade: Implications for disaster risk management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 4(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2022.4.1.5
16.
DenhamB. E. (2010). Measurement of risk perceptions in social research: A comparative analysis of ordinary least squares, ordinal and multinomial logistic regression models. Journal of Risk Research, 13(5), 571–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870903172386
17.
Eryılmaz TürkkanG.HırcaT. (2021). The investigation of flood risk perception as a quantitative analysis from socio-demographic perspective. Natural Hazards, 106(1), 715–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04488-6
18.
Esposito VinziV.RussolilloG. (2013). Partial least squares algorithms and methods. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 5(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1239
19.
FarrésM.PlatikanovS.TsakovskiS.TaulerR. (2015). Comparison of the variable importance in projection (VIP) and of the selectivity ratio (SR) methods for variable selection and interpretation. Journal of Chemometrics, 29(10), 528–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.2736
20.
FrewerL. (1999). Risk perception, social trust, and public participation in strategic decision making: Implications for emerging technologies. Ambio, 28, 569–574. https://doi.org/10.2307/43149482
21.
GarsonG. D. (2016). Partial least squares: Regression and structural equation models. Statistical Associates Publishers.
22.
Gazquez LinaresJ. J.Molero JuradoM. D. M.Martos MartínezÁJiménez-RodríguezD.Pérez-FuentesM. D. C. (2021). The repercussions of perceived threat from COVID-19 on the mental health of actively employed nurses. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 30(3), 724–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12841
23.
GerberB. J.NeeleyG. W. (2005). Perceived risk and citizen preferences for governmental management of routine hazards. Policy Studies Journal, 33(3), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00125.x
24.
GierlachE.BelsherB. E.BeutlerL. E. (2010). Cross-cultural differences in risk perceptions of disasters. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 30(10), 1539–1549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01451.x
25.
GrisafiJ. G. (2021). A marginal religion and COVID-19 in South Korea: Shincheonji, public discourse, and the shaping of religion. Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, 25(1), 40–63. https://doi.org/10.1525/nr.2021.25.1.40
26.
GuC.ChanC. W.HeG. P.ChoiK. C.YangS. B. (2013). Chinese Women's motivation to receive future screening: The role of social-demographic factors, knowledge and risk perception of cervical cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 17(2), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2012.04.001
27.
GuastafierroE.ToppoC.MagnaniF. G.RomanoR.FacchiniC.CampioniR.LeonardiM. (2021). Older adults’ risk perception during the COVID-19 pandemic in lombardy region of Italy: A cross-sectional survey. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 64(6), 585–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2021.1918433
28.
HellandI. S. (2001). Some theoretical aspects of partial least squares regression. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 58(2), 97–107.
29.
HelslootI.RuitenbergA. (2004). Citizen response to disasters: A survey of literature and some practical implications. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 12(3), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0966-0879.2004.00440.x
HoM. C.ShawD.LinS.ChiuY. C. (2008). How do disaster characteristics influence risk perception?Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 28(3), 635–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01040.x
HuangL.ZhangF.WuX.PengY.BaoH.ZhangY. (2022). High school students’ trust and risk perception of typhoon disaster: Moderating role of government ability in disaster management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 71, 102816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102816
ImaiH.OkumiyaK.FukutomiE.WadaT.IshimotoY.KimuraY.MatsubayashiK. (2015). Association between risk perception, subjective knowledge, and depression in community-dwelling elderly people in Japan. Psychiatry Research, 227(1), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.03.002
JanssenE.VerduynP.WatersE. A. (2018). Don't know responses to cognitive and affective risk perception measures: Exploring prevalence and socio-demographic moderators. British Journal of Health Psychology, 23(2), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12296
38.
JeongG. S. (2012). Presumed influence factors of decision-making of mega-projects. The Board of Audit and Inspection, 19, 91–124.
39.
JóhannesdóttirG.GísladóttirG. (2010). People living under threat of volcanic hazard in southern Iceland: Vulnerability and risk perception. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 10(2), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-407-2010
40.
JonesE. C.FaasA. J.MurphyA. D.TobinG. A.WhitefordL. M.McCartyC. (2013). Cross-cultural and site-based influences on demographic, well-being, and social network predictors of risk perception in hazard and disaster settings in Ecuador and Mexico: Predictors of risk perception in hazard and disaster settings in Ecuador and Mexico. Human Nature, 24, 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-013-9162-3
41.
KimJ. H.LeeH.WonY. S.SonW. S.ImJ. (2021). Rapid transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 within a religious sect in South Korea: A mathematical modeling study. Epidemics, 37, 100519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2021.100519
42.
LimaM. L.BarnettJ.ValaJ. (2005). Risk perception and technological development at a societal level. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 25(5), 1229–1239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00664.x
43.
MaL.ChristensenT. (2019). Government trust, social trust, and citizens’ risk concerns: Evidence from crisis management in China. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(2), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1464478
44.
MahieuB.QannariE. M.JaillaisB. (2023). Extension and significance testing of Variable importance in projection (VIP) indices in partial least squares regression and principal components analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 242, 104986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2023.104986
45.
MarshallT. M. (2020). Risk perception and safety culture: Tools for improving the implementation of disaster risk reduction strategies. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 47, 101557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101557
46.
MartinelliN.GilS.BelletierC.ChevalèreJ.DezecacheG.HuguetP.Droit-VoletS. (2021). Time and emotion during lockdown and the COVID-19 epidemic: Determinants of our experience of time?Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 616169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.616169
47.
The ministry of Interior and Safety. (2021). 2021 Annual Disaster report. The ministry of Interior and Safety.
48.
MızrakS.AslanR. (2020). Disaster risk perception of university students. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 11(4), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12202
49.
MorelliS.PazziV.NardiniO.BonatiS. (2022). Framing disaster risk perception and vulnerability in social Media communication. A Literature Review. Sustainability, 14(15), 9148. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159148
50.
National Institute for Disaster Safety Research. (2021). the technical level and satisfaction of disaster safety field. National Institute for Disaster Safety Research.
51.
NguyenT. T. T. (2023). Citizens’ intentions to use e-government during the COVID-19 pandemic: Integrating the technology acceptance model and perceived risk theory. Kybernetes, 52(7), 2329–2346. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-07-2022-1023
52.
NiforatosS.PanagiotakosD.DelladetsimasP. M. (2024). Socio-demographic determinants of earthquake risk perception: The case of the Corinthiakos Gulf, in Greece. Natural Hazards, 120(4), 3847–3864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06356-5
RennO.RohrmannB. (2000). Cross-cultural risk perception: State and challenges. Springer US.
56.
RennO.RohrmannB. (2013). Cross-cultural risk perception: a survey of empirical studies (Vol. 13). Springer Science & Business Media.
57.
RezaeiS.ShahijanM. K.ValaeiN.RahimiR.IsmailW. K. W. (2018). Experienced international business traveller’s behaviour in Iran: A partial least squares path modelling analysis. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 18(2), 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358416636930
58.
RohrmannB. (1994). Risk perception of different societal groups: Australian findings and crossnational comparisons. Australian Journal of Psychology, 46(3), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539408259490
59.
RohrmannB.ChenH. (1999). Risk perception in China and Australia: An exploratory crosscultural study. Journal of Risk Research, 2(3), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/136698799376817
60.
RosiA.Van VugtF. T.LecceS.CeccatoI.VallarinoM.RapisardaF.CavalliniE. (2021). Risk perception in a real-world situation (COVID-19): How it changes from 18 to 87 years old. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 646558. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646558
SaivasanR.LokhandeM. (2022). Influence of risk propensity, behavioural biases and demographic factors on equity investors’ risk perception. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 6(3), 373–403. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEB-06-2021-0074
63.
SharmaA.McCloskeyB.HuiD. S.RambiaA.ZumlaA.TraoreT.Rodrigues-MoralesA. J. (2023). Global mass gathering events and deaths due to crowd surge, stampedes, crush and physical injuries-lessons from the Seoul Halloween and other disasters. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease, 52, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102524
64.
SiegristM.ÁrvaiJ. (2020). Risk perception: Reflections on 40 years of research. Risk Analysis, 40(S1), 2191–2206. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13599
65.
SlovicP. (2016). The perception of risk. Routledge.
ViscusiW. K. (1995). Government action, biases in risk perception, and insurance decisions. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 20, 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01098960
68.
WachingerG.RennO.BeggC.KuhlickeC. (2013). The risk perception paradox—implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 33(6), 1049–1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x
69.
WeberE. U.HseeC. K. (1999). Models and mosaics: Investigating cross-cultural differences in risk perception and risk preference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(4), 611–617. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212969
70.
WehnU.EversJ. (2015). The social innovation potential of ICT-enabled citizen observatories to increase eParticipation in local flood risk management. Technology in Society, 42, 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.05.002
71.
WehnU.RuscaM.EversJ.LanfranchiV. (2015). Participation in flood risk management and the potential of citizen observatories: A governance analysis. Environmental Science & Policy, 48, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.12.017
72.
WoldS.SjöströmM.ErikssonL. (2001). PLS-regression: A basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 58(2), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00155-1
73.
XiaN.WangX.GriffinM. A.WuC.LiuB. (2017). Do we see how they perceive risk? An integrated analysis of risk perception and its effect on workplace safety behavior. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 106, 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.06.010
74.
XieW.WeiY.XuanC.MaY.LeeE. W. M.LiT.ChengY. (2024). Understanding pedestrian crowd dynamics on ramps: An empirical study triggered by Seoul Halloween crowd crush. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 109, 104601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104601
75.
XuX.ChengG. (2024). Save the day: How the dissemination of tourism crises can reinvigorate a tourism destination image after the Seoul halloween crowd crush. Sustainability, 16(6), 2256. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062256
76.
YamashitaR. (2020). Relationship between citizens’ risk perceptions formed by disaster information and migration decision-making: Evidence from Japan. Progress in Disaster Science, 5, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100056
77.
YinQ.ChenA.SongX.DengG.DongW. (2021). Risk perception and PTSD symptoms of medical staff combating against COVID-19: A PLS structural equation model. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 607612. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.607612
78.
YuT.YangH.LuoX.JiangY.WuX.GaoJ. (2021). Scientometric analysis of disaster risk perception: 2000–2020. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24), 13003. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413003
