The paper reviews the history leading to the creation of the US Safety Net as well as synthesis and critique of evaluation research for the three major programmes: Food Stamps, School Feeding, and WIC. the effects of the cadre of safety net programmes on household income are examined. the recent Welfare Reform Legislation changed the nature and scope of the nutrition safety net. the implications of these changes for income, diet, and nutritional status are discussed as well as critical issues for maintaining the effectiveness of the nutrition safety net in the future.
References
1.
US Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion.Nutrition action themes for the United States. A report in response to the International Conference on Nutrition.Washington, DC: CNPP-2, 1996.
2.
US Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service.U.S. action plan on food security: solutions to hunger.Washington, DC: USDA, 1999.
3.
US Department of Health, Education and Welfare.Ten-state nutrition survey, 1968-1970. Vol. 1–V and highlights. DHEW Publication No. (HMS) 72-8130-72-8134. Washington, DC: DHEW.
4.
OwenG.M.A study of the nutritional status of preschool children in the United States, 1968-1970. Pediatrics1974; 53(suppl 4): 597–646.
5.
National Center for Health Statistics.First health and nutrition examination survey, United States, 1971-1974.Washington, DC: Government Printing office, 1976.
SalatheL.E.The food stamp program and low-income households’ food purchases. Agric Econ Res1980; 32: 33–41.
8.
WestD.A., PriceD.W.The effects of income, assets, food programs and household size on food consumption. Am J Agric Econ1976; 58: 725–31.
9.
BlancifortiL.A.Food stamp program effects in Puerto Rico.Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, 1983.
10.
SenauerB., YoungN.Food stamps re-examined. Community Nutritionist1982; II(4): 22–5.
11.
CroninF.J.Nutrient levels and food used by households: 1977 and 1965. Fam Econ Rev1980; Spring: 10–5.
12.
BasiotisP.P., Kramer-LeBlancC., KennedyE.Maintaining food and nutrition security: the role of the Food Stamp Program and WIC. Fam Econ Nutr Rev1998; 11(1-2): 4–16.
13.
EdozienJ., SwitzerB., BryanR.Medical evaluation of the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants and Children. Am J Clin Nutr1979; 32: 677–92.
14.
KennedyE.T., GershoffS., ReedR., AustinJ.Evaluation of the effect of WIC supplemental feeding on birth weight. J Am Diet Assoc1982; 80: 220–7.
15.
KotelchuckM., SchwartzJ., anderkaM., FinisonK.WIC participation and pregnancy outcomes: Massachusetts statewide evaluation project. Am J Public Health1984; 74: 1086–92.
16.
KotelchuckM., SchwartzJ., anderkaM., FinisonK.Follow-up study of effects of WIC on prenatal participants in Massachusetts.Washington, DC: Final Report to the Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, 1984.
17.
MetcoffJ., CostiloeP., CrosbyW., DuttaS., SandsteadH., MilneD., BodwellD., MajorsS.Effect of food supplementation (WIC) during pregnancy on birth weight. Am J Clin Nutr1985; 41: 933–47.
18.
RushD., HorvitzD.G., SeaverW.B., LeightonJ., SloanN.L., JohnsonS.S., KulkaR.A., DevoreJ.W., HoltM., LynchJ.T.The national WIC evaluations: evaluation of the special supplemental food program for women, infants, and children. IV. Study methodology and sample characteristics in the longitudinal study of pregnant women, the study of children, and the food expenditures study. Am J Clin Nutr1988; 48: 429–38.
19.
DevaneyB., SchrimA.Infant mortality among Medicaid newborns in 5 states: the effects of prenatal WIC participation.Princeton, NJ, USA: Mathematica Policy Research, 1993.
20.
US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service.Continuing survey of food intakes by individuals, 1994-1996.Washington, DC: USDA, 1997.
21.
WellischJ., HanesS.D., JordonL.A., MauerK.M., VermeerschJ.A.The national evaluation of school nutrition programs. Vols. 1 and 2.Santa Monica, Calif, USA: Systems Development Corporation, 1983.
22.
DevaneyB., GordonA.R., BurghardtJ.A.Dietary intakes of students. Am J Clin Nutr1995; 61: 205S–12S.
23.
US Department of Agriculture and US Department of Health and Human Services.Nutrition and your health: dietary guidelines for Americans. 4th ed. Home and Garden Bulletin No. 232.Washington, DC: Government Printing office, 1995.
24.
PrimusW.E., PorterK., DittoM., KentM.The safety net delivers: the effects of government benefit programs in reducing poverty.Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 1996.
25.
KennedyE., OhlsJ., CarlsonS., FlemingK.The healthy eating index: design and applications. J Am Diet Assoc1995; 95: 1103–8.
26.
P.L. 104-103. Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. 22 August 1996.
27.
FogelR.W.Economic growth, population theory, and physiology. the bearing of long term process on the making of economic policy. Am Econ Rev1994; 84: 369–95.
