Poverty alleviation programs for the extreme poor improve participants' economic status and may impact other important outcomes that are seldom evaluated. A program targeted to the extreme poor by BRAC, a development organization in Bangladesh, has been successful in significantly alleviating extreme poverty.
Objective
We hypothesized that the program also improved the nutritional status of women and preschool children.
Methods
A nonequivalent control, pre- and posttest quasi-experimental design that was longitudinal at the village level was used to test the hypotheses. Data were collected from a random sample of 4,131 children and 3,551 women from 3,409 households in 159 villages of 3 northern districts of Bangladesh in 2002 and 2006. Linear mixed random-intercept models accounted for clustering effects and potential confounders.
Results
The weight-for-height of children between 24 and 35 months of age from program households was significantly higher (p < .05) than that of children from control households. We found no significant differences between control and program households in three other growth and body-composition indicators in three other age categories of preschool children or in women.
Conclusions
These results are important, as this is a large-scale program that has already been extended to more than half the country. The findings will contribute to judging the cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness of the program and in garnering support for the expansion of such programs.
de OnisMGarzaCOnyangoAWBorghiE. WHO child growth standards. Acta Paediatr Suppl2006;450:1–101.
2.
Black RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA, Caulfield LE, de Onis M, Ezzati M, Mathers C, Rivera J, for the Maternal and Child Undernutrition Study Group. Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet2008;371:243–60.
3.
United Nations Children's Education Fund. The state of the world's children 2011. New York: UNICEF, 2011.
4.
de OnisMOnyangoAWBorghiESiyamANishidaCSiekmannJ. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ2007;85:660–7.
5.
HosegoodVCampbellOM. Body mass index, height, weight, arm circumference, and mortality in rural Bangladeshi women: a 19-y longitudinal study. Am J Clin Nutr2003;77:341–47.
6.
ShafiqueSAkhterNStallkampGde PeeSPanagidesDBloemMW. Trends of under- and overweight among rural and urban poor women indicate the double burden of malnutrition in Bangladesh. Int J Epidemiol2007;36:449–57.
7.
World Health Organization. Physical status: use and interpretation of anthropometry. Geneva: WHO, 1995.
8.
Grantham-McGregor S, Cheung YB, Cueto S, Glewwe P, Richter L, Strupp B, International Child Development Steering Group. Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries. Lancet2007;369:60–70.
9.
VictoraCGAdairLFallCHallalPCMartorellRRichterLSachdevHS. Maternal and child undernutrition: consequences for adult health and human capital. Lancet2008;371:340–57.
10.
United Nations Children's Education Fund. The state of the world's children 1998. New York: UNICEF, 1998.
11.
BRAC, Research and Evaluation Division. Stories of targeting: process documentation of selecting the ultra poor for CFPR/TUP programme. CFPR/TUP Working Paper Series 1. Dhaka and Ottawa: BRAC Research and Evaluation Division and Aga Khan Foundation, 2004.
12.
MatinIHalderSR. Combining methodologies for better targeting of the extreme poor: lessons from BRAC's CFPR/TUP Programme. CFPR/TUP Working Paper Series 2. Dhaka and Ottawa: BRAC Research and Evaluation Division and Aga Khan Foundation, 2004.
13.
SulaimanMMatinI. Targeting effectiveness of CFPR/TUP in scale-up environment. CFPR/TUP Working Paper Series 8. Dhaka and Ottawa: BRAC Research and Evaluation Division and Aga Khan Foundation, 2006.
14.
ShamsRMahmudSDasNC. Integration of the ultra poor into mainstream development: how effective is CFPR? CFPR/TUP Working Paper Series 21. Dhaka: BRAC Research and Evaluation Division, 2010.
15.
AhmedSMRanaAM. Customized development interventions for the ultra poor: preliminary change assessments of health and health-seeking behavior (CFPR/TUP 2002 to 2004). CFPR/TUP Working Paper Series 7. Dhaka and Ottawa: BRAC Research and Evaluation Division and Aga Khan Foundation, 2005.
16.
HaseenF. Change in food and nutrient consumption among the ultra poor: is the CFPR/TUP programme making a difference? CFPR/TUP Working Paper Series 11. Dhaka and Ottawa: BRAC Research and Evaluation Division and Aga Khan Foundation, 2006.
17.
RabbaniMPrakashVASulaimanM. Impact assessment of CFPR/TUP: a descriptive analysis based on 2002–2005 panel data. CFPR/TUP Working Paper Series 12. Dhaka and Ottawa: BRAC Research and Evaluation Division and Aga Khan Foundation, 2006.
18.
BRAC, Research and Evaluation Division. Towards a profile of ultra poor in Bangladesh: findings from the CFPR/TUP baseline survey. Dhaka and Ottawa: BRAC Research and Evaluation Division and Aga Khan Foundation, 2004.
19.
World Health Organization. WHO child growth standards: length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age: methods and development. Geneva: WHO, 2006.
20.
GertlerPJMartinezSPremandPRawlingsLBVermeerschCMJ. Impact evaluation in practice. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2011.
21.
WaterlowJC. Classification and definition of protein-calorie malnutrition. Br Med J1972;3:566–9.
22.
BéginFHabichtJPFrongilloEAJrDelisleH. The deterioration in children's nutritional status in rural Chad: the effect of mothers' influence on feeding. Am J Public Health1997;87:1356–9.
23.
FrongilloEANanamaS. Development and validation of an experience-based measure of household food insecurity within and across seasons in northern Burkina Faso. J Nutr2006;136:1409S–19S.
24.
MartorellRHabichtJ-P. Growth in early childhood in developing countries. In: FalknerFTannerJ, eds. Human growth: a comprehensive treatise. Vol 3. New York: Plenum Press, 1986.
25.
RasheedSHaiderRHassanNPachónHIslamSJalalCSSanghviTG. Why does nutrition deteriorate rapidly among children under 2 years of age? Using qualitative methods to understand community perspectives on complementary feeding practices in Bangladesh. Food Nutr Bull2011;32:192–200.
26.
BrownKHBlackREBakerSHoqueA. Patterns of physical growth in longitudinal study of young children in rural Bangladesh. Am J Clin Nutr1982;35:745–56.
27.
MartorellRLeslieJMoockPR. Characteristics and determinants of child nutritional status in Nepal. Am J Clin Nutr1984;39:74–86.
28.
FrongilloEA. Symposium: causes and etiology of stunting. Introduction. J Nutr1999;129(2 suppl):529S–30S.
29.
ThompsonRANelsonCA. Developmental science and the media: early brain development. Am Psychol2001;56:5–15.
30.
FalknerFHolzqreveWSchlooRH. Prenatal influence on postnatal growth: overview and pointers for needed research. Eur J Clin Nutr1994;48(suppl 1):S15–24.
31.
KramerMVictoraCG. Low birth weight and perinatal mortality. In: SembaRSBloemMW, eds. Nutrition and health in developing countries. Totowa, NJ, USA: Humana Press, 2001:57–69.
32.
ImdadABhuttaZA. Maternal nutrition and birth outcomes: effect of balanced protein-energy supplementation. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol2012;26(suppl 1):178–90.
33.
HaseenF. Change in food and energy consumption among the ultra poor: is the poverty reduction programme making a difference?Asia Pac J Clin Nutr2007;16(suppl 1):S58–64.
34.
WinkvistAHabichtJ-PRasmussenKMFrongilloEAJr. Malnourished mothers maintain their weight throughout pregnancy and lactation: results from Guatemala. Adv Exp Biol Med2000;478:415–6.
35.
AhmedSMHossainMA. Taking doctors where the ultra poor are: assessment of the panel doctor scheme of CFPR/TUP programme. CFPR/TUP Working Paper Series 17. Dhaka and Ottawa: BRAC Research and Evaluation Division and Aga Khan Foundation, 2007.
36.
EnglePLCastleSMenonP. Child development: vulnerability and resilience. Soc Sci Med1996;43:621–35.
37.
FrongilloEAJrde OnisMHansonKM. Socioeconomic and demographic factors are associated with worldwide patterns of stunting and wasting of children. J Nutr1997;127:2302–9.
