Developing countries face difficulties in sustainably utilizing tools to effectively implement control measures for zoonoses. This is mainly due to dispersed and heterogeneous smallholder livestock systems, predominance of informal markets, poor infrastructure and lack of resources to deliver information, interventions, and regulations. In addition, developing countries lack an evidence base for planning and targeting control efforts. Zoonotic infections are receiving more and more international attention as diseases of neglected and impoverished communities, at the intersection between livestock production, human health, and poverty.
Objective
To review research innovations and trends that can help identify and test targeted control strategies for zoonoses tailored to poor communities, focusing particularly on Africa.
Methods
Review of recommendations of relevant working groups and scientific literature.
Results
New and innovative research approaches promise to better capture the impact of zoonoses from a societal perspective and the perspective of poor livestock owners through more comprehensive frameworks that consider benefits of the control of zoonoses to the public health, livestock, and private sectors. It is challenging to better assure food safety in informal markets. Risk-based approaches with participatory elements provide a framework in which stakeholders can decide an appropriate level of protection to balance the needs for safe food, cheap food, and pro-poor economic growth. Appropriate information for all stakeholders and capacity-building of national and regional authorities is an important element of this process. New diagnostic tools that are accurate and easily used in developing-country health centers and markets can assist in reporting of cases, detection of patients, and testing of control strategies.
Conclusions
A research agenda on zoonoses of the livestock sector should be interdisciplinary and participatory and include intersectoral collaborations, notably between the livestock and public health sectors.
MurphyFA. The threat posed by the global emergence of livestock, food-borne, and zoonotic pathogens. Ann N Y Acad Sci1999;894:20–7.
2.
BlancouJChomelBBBelottoAMeslinFX. Emerging or re-emerging bacterial zoonoses: Factors of emergence, surveillance and control. Vet Res2005;36:507–22.
3.
WHO/DFID-AHP meeting on control of zoonotic diseases: A route to poverty alleviation among livestock-keeping communities. Available at: http://www.who.int/zoonoses/diseases/sept05/en/. Accessed 17 February 2007.
4.
WHO. Intensified control of neglected diseases. Report of an International Workshop, Berlin, 10–12 December 2003. WHO/CDS/CPE/CEE/2004.45. 2004. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2004/WHO_CDS_CPE_CEE_2004.45.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2007.
5.
OdiitMColemanPGLiuWCMcDermottJJFevreEMWelburnSCWoolhouseME. Quantifying the level of under-detection of Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense sleeping sickness cases. Trop Med Int Health2005;10:840–9.
6.
FlisserARodriguez-CanulRWillinghamALIII. Control of the taeniosis/cysticercosis complex: Future developments. Vet Parasitol2006;139:283–92.
7.
BravemanPGruskinS. Poverty, equity, human rights and health. Bull World Health Organ2003;81:539–45.
8.
NeumannCGBwiboNOMurphySPSigmanMWhaleySAllenLHGuthrieDWeissREDemmentMW. Animal source foods improve dietary quality, micronutrient status, growth and cognitive function in Kenyan school children: Background, study design and baseline findings. J Nutr2003;133(11suppl 2):3941S–9S.
9.
KristjansonPKrishnaARadenyMNindoW. Pathways out of poverty in western Kenya and the role of livestock. Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative (PPLPI) Working Paper No. 14. 2004. Available at: http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/projects/en/pplpi/docarc/wp14.pdf. Accessed 17 February 2007.
10.
SchiereHThysEMatthysFRischkowskyBSchiereJ. Livestock keeping in urbanised areas: Does history repeat itself? In: van VeenhuizenR, ed. Cities farming for the future: Urban agriculture for green and productive cities. RUAF Foundation/International Institute of Rural Reconstruction/International Development Research Centre, 2006: 349–79.
11.
CleavelandSShawDJMfinangaSGShirimaGKazwalaRREblateESharpM. Mycobacterium bovis in rural Tanzania: Risk factors for infection in human and cattle populations. Tuberculosis (Edinb)2007:87:30–43.
12.
DelgadoCRosengrantMSteinfeldHEhuiSCourboisC. Livestock to 2020—The next food revolution. Food, Agriculture and the Environment Discussion Paper 28:1–83. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, and International Livestock Research Institute, 1999.
13.
ThorntonPKKruskaRLHenningerNKristjansonPMReidRSAtienoFOderoANNdegwaT. Mapping poverty and livestock in the developing world. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute, 2002.
14.
NicholsonCFBlakeRWReidRSSchelhasJ. Environmental impacts of livestock in the developing world. Environment2001;43:7–17.
15.
AshleySHoldenSBazeleyP. Livestock in development. Livestock in poverty-focused development. Somerset, UK: Livestock in Development, 1999.
16.
PerryBDRandolphTFMcDermottJJSonesKRThorntonPK, eds. Investing in animal health research to alleviate poverty. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Reseach Institute, 2002.
17.
TambiENMainaOWBessinR. Animal and animal products trade in Africa: New Development perspectives in international trade for Africa. J Int Food Agribus Mark2004;14:49–67.
18.
LightowlersMWColebrookALGauciCGGauciSMKyngdonCTMonkhouseJLVallejo RodriquezCReadAJRolfeRASatoC. Vaccination against cestode parasites: Anti-helminth vaccines that work and why. Vet Parasitol2003;115:83–123.
19.
PritchardDG. A century of bovine tuberculosis 1888–1988: Conquest and controversy. J Comp Pathol1988;99:357–99.
20.
McDermottJJRandolphTFStaalSJ. The economics of optimal health and productivity in smallholder livestock systems in developing countries. Rev Sci Tech1999;18:399–424.
21.
NgowiHAKassukuAAMaedaGEBoaMECarabinHWillinghamALIII. Risk factors for the prevalence of porcine cysticercosis in Mbulu District, Tanzania. Vet Parasitol2004;120:275–83.
22.
AhujaV. The economic rationale of public and private sector roles in the provision of animal health services. Rev Sci Tech2004;23:33–45.
23.
HuntP. Neglected diseases, social justice and human rights: Some preliminary observations. Health and Human Rights Working Paper Series No. 4. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003.
24.
NsengiyumvaGDruet-CabanacMRamanankandrasanaBBouteilleBNsizabiraLPreuxPM. Cysticercosis as a major risk factor for epilepsy in Burundi, East Africa. Epilepsia2003;44:950–5.
25.
AmexoMTolhurstRBarnishGBatesI. Malaria misdiagnosis: Effects on the poor and vulnerable. Lancet2004;364:1896–8.
26.
SchellingEDiguimbayeCDaoudSNicoletJBoerlinPTannerMZinnstagJ. Brucellosis and Q-fever seroprevalences of nomadic pastoralists and their livestock in Chad. Prev Vet Med2003;61:279–93.
27.
SchellingEBechirMAboulaye AhmedMWyssKRandolphTFZinsstagJ. Human and animal delivery to remote nomadic families, Chad. Emerg Infect Dis2007;13:373–9.
28.
MurrayCJLopezAD, eds. The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. (Global burden of disease and injury series. Vol 1.) Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press, 1996.
29.
CarabinHBudkeCMCowanLDWillinghamALIIITorgersonPR. Methods for assessing the burden of parasitic zoonoses: Echinococcosis and cysticercosis. Trends Parasitol2005;21:327–33.
30.
ZinsstagJSchellingERothFKazwalaR. Economics of bovine tuberculosis. In: ThoenCSteeleJGilsdorfM, eds. Mycobacterium bovis infection in animals and humans, 2006. Ames, IA, USA: Blackwell Publishing.
31.
ColemanP. Zoonotic diseases and their Impact on the poor. In: PerryBDRandolphTFMcDermottJJSonesKRThorntonPK, eds. Investing in animal health research to alleviate poverty. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute, 2002: Appendix 9: 1–21.
32.
MangenMJJvan DuynhovenYTHPvan PeltWKemmerenJHevelaarAH. Prioritisation for foodborne pathogens. Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine. Exeter, UK, 29–31 March 2006:266–7.
33.
BatzBMHoffmannSAKrupnickAJMorrisJGShermanDMTaylorMRTickJS. Identifying the most significant microbiological foodborne hazards to public health: A new risk ranking model. Food Safety Research Consortium Discussion Paper Series 2004:1. Available at: http://www.rff.org/Documents/FRSC-DP-01.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2007.
34.
RothFZinsstagJOrkhonDChimed-OchirCHuttonGCarrinGOtteJ. Human health benefits from livestock vaccination for brucellosis: Case study. Bull World Health Organ2003;81:867–76.
35.
BudkeCMJiaminQQianWTorgersonPR. Economic effects of echinococcosis in a disease-endemic region of the Tibetan Plateau. Am J Trop Med Hyg2005;73:2–10.
36.
BudkeCM. Global socioeconomic impact of cystic echinococcosis. Emerg Infect Dis2006;12:296–303.
37.
ColemanPGFevreEMCleavelandS. Estimating the public health impact of rabies. Emerg Infect Dis2004;10:140–2.
38.
KnobelDLCleavelandSColemanPGFevreEMMeltzerMIMirandaMEShawAZinsstagJMeslinFX. Re-evaluating the burden of rabies in Africa and Asia. Bull World Health Organ2005;83:360–8.
39.
CleavelandSFevreEMKaareMColemanPG. Estimating human rabies mortality in the United Republic of Tanzania from dog bite injuries. Bull World Health Organ2002;80:304–10.
40.
OdiitMColemanPFevreEMMagonaJWMcDermottJ. Incorporating the burden of human sleeping sickness in an economic impact assessment of trypanosomiasis. Proceedings of the 9th Symposium of the International Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics (ISVEE), 2000. Breckenridge, Colo, USA: ISVEE9, 350.
41.
CarabinHKrecekRCCowanLDMichaelLFoyaca-SibatHNashTWallinghamAL. Estimation of the cost of Taenia solium cysticercosis in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Trop Med Int Health2006;11:906–16.
42.
ZinsstagJSchellingEWyssKMahamatMB. Potential of cooperation between human and animal health to strengthen health systems. Lancet2005;366:2142–5.
43.
MeadPSSlutskerLDietzVMcCaigLFBreseeJSShapiroCGriffinPMTauxeRV. Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis1999;5:607–25.
44.
PillingD. Livestock disease prioritisation and the poor: Findings from India. MPhil. thesis, University of Reading, UK, 2004.
45.
OmoreALoreTStaalSKutwaJOumaRArimiSKang'etheE. Addressing the public health and quality concerns towards marketed milk in Kenya. SDP Research and Development Report 3. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute, 2005:1–45.
46.
ThomsonGRPerryBDCatleyALeylandTJPenrithMLDonaldsonAI. Certification for regional and international trade in livestock commodities: The need to balance credibility and enterprise. Vet Rec2006;159:53–7.
47.
HatanakaMBainCBuschL. Third-party certification in the global agrifood system. Food Policy2005;30:354–69.
48.
OmoreACheng'ole MulindoJFakhrul IslamSMNurahGKhanMIStaalSJDugbillBT. Employment generation through small-scale dairy marketing and processing: Experiences from Kenya, Bangladesh and Ghana. Nairobi and Rome: ILRI Market-Oriented Smallholder Dairy Project and FAO Animal Production and Health Division, 2001.
49.
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization. Part I: Food safety risk analysis: An overview and framework manual. Rome and Geneva: FAO/WHO, 2005.
50.
PerryBDNin-PrattASonesKStevensC. An appropriate level of risk: Balancing the need for safe livestock products with fair market access for the poor. Pro-poor Livestock Policy Initiative Working Paper No. 23. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization /International Livestock Research Institute, 2005.
51.
ArimiSMKorotiEKang'etheEKOmoreAOMcDermottJJ. Risk of infection with Brucella abortus and Escherichia coli O157:H7 associated with marketing of unpasteurized milk in Kenya. Acta Trop2005;96:1–8.
52.
ChambersR. Rural development: Putting the last first. London: Longmans, 1983.
53.
CatleyALeylandT. Community participation and the delivery of veterinary services in Africa. Prev Vet Med2001;49:95–113.
54.
BaumFMacDougallCSmithD. Participatory action research. J Epidemiol Community Health2006;60:854–7.
55.
UphoffN. Fitting projects to people. In: CerneaMM, ed. Putting people first: sociological variables in rural development. Washington DC: The World Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 1985:359–95.
56.
ClaytonAOakleyPPrattB. Empowering people: A guide to participation. New York: United Nations Development Programme, 1998.
57.
PrattGL. Practitioners' critical reflections on PRA and participation in Nepal. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies, 2000. Working Paper 22.
58.
DeborggraeveSClaesFLaurentTMertensPLeclipteuxTDujardinJCHerdewijnPBuscherP. Molecular dipstick test for diagnosis of sleeping sickness. J Clin Microbiol2006;44:2884–9.
59.
UsdinMGuillermMChiracP. Neglected tests for neglected patients. Nature2006;441:283–4.
60.
SlapetaJ. Cryptosporidium species found in cattle: A proposal for a new species. Trends Parasitol2006;22:469–74.
61.
World Health Organization. Waterborne zoonoses: Identification, causes and control. London: IWA Publishing, Alliance House, 2004.
