Abstract
Stable isotopes are used with increasing frequency to trace the metabolic fate of minerals in human nutrition studies. The precision of the analytical methods used must be sufficient to permit reliable measurement of low enrichments and the accuracy should permit comparisons between studies. Two methods most frequently used today are thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). This study was conducted to compare the two methods. Multiple natural samples of copper, zinc, molybdenum, and magnesium were analyzed by both methods to compare their internal and external precision. Samples with a range of isotopic enrichments that were collected from human studies or prepared from standards were analyzed to compare their accuracy. TIMS was more precise and accurate than ICP-MS. However, the cost, ease, and speed of analysis were better for ICP-MS. Therefore, for most purposes, ICP-MS is the method of choice, but when the highest degrees of precision and accuracy are required and when enrichments are very low, TIMS is the method of choice.