Abstract

This article is one in a multipart series where the American College of Lifestyle Medicine (ACLM) President, Dr Dexter Shurney, introduces a key person or organization that will take ACLM to the next level through one or more aspects of the “4 P” strategy—Policy, Partnership, Payment, and Public Relations. In this second article, Dr Shurney Interviews Cathryn Couch, Chief Executive Officer of Ceres Community Project on Partnership.
Our community-based model, Healing Meals for Healthy Communities, brings young people ages 14 to 22 into 2 organic gardens and 3 commercial kitchens where they serve as the primary gardeners and chefs providing healthy, 100% organic medically tailored meals to low-income community members facing a serious illness. Among medically tailored meal providers in the country, we are the only organization providing 100% organic food, and the only one engaging youth as the primary gardeners and chefs. The other thing that makes us unique is that we use an environmental nutrition framework to guide our work. In other words, we understand that health for individuals is inextricably intertwined with the health of our food system and environment. We also know that social connections are huge drivers of health outcomes. Our model strives to reweave the webs of social connection at the community level, and to model for young people what a healthy community looks and feels like. Along with 450 youth, we engage 600+ adult volunteers each year along with hundreds of donors and community businesses and farms. Each of us is healthier for being part of the Ceres’ family.
We are also the largest provider of community nutrition education in our area. This year we’ll offer 85 nutrition education classes, including monthly classes at 2 federally qualified health centers, and classes through our county library system.
My background includes an MBA and work in marketing and marketing research in the for-profit sector, 4 years as the Director of Communications for a national nonprofit, and 10 years running the first organic home-delivered meal business in the San Francisco Bay Area from 1993 to 2003—long before the revolution that’s happened in prepared meal delivery and meal kits. Today I serve as Ceres’ Chief Executive Officer.
Locally we partner with all of our health care providers, and especially federally qualified health centers. We’re active in 2 national coalitions—Food is Medicine and The Root Cause Coalition; 2 statewide coalitions—California Food Is Medicine and California Food and Farming Network; and 3 local collaboratives working on food access, food policy, and food and health. In our work on organic food, we work with Health Care without Harm, who have developed food procurement guidelines that include environmental impacts of food choices, and CCOF (the largest certifiers of organic farms), who are working on a policy platform to expand organic agriculture in California, and many companies in the organic food sector.
For clients, we see statistically significant improvement on 8 out of 10 quality of life measures using the FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General) validated survey. Clients increase fruit and vegetable consumption by 17%, and 70% of clients report that they’ve made positive changes in their eating habits as a result of what they learned from Ceres. Finally, 93% report that they feel more connected and cared for as a result of the meals.
Among youth who’ve been out of the program 2 years or more, 47% are cooking from scratch 4 times a week or more, and 78% describe their diet as mostly fresh food; 60% continue to be active as volunteers and 95% say their time at Ceres was influential in this area; and 58% are studying or working in fields related to Ceres’ work with 78% saying their time at Ceres was influential.
Gathering data about the impact of food on health outcomes requires partnership from health care providers. We’re very excite to be engaged in 3 different studies. We were instrumental in California’s decision to invest $6 million in a 3-year pilot of a nutrition intervention for MediCal patients with congestive heart failure. Along with 5 other medically tailored meal providers we will provide 1000 patients with 12 weeks of complete nutrition plus 4 visits with a registered dietitian. An outside evaluation team will use the MediCal claims database to look at health outcomes, health care utilization, and costs for our patients compared with a 4000 person control group. We are also doing a small pilot with Kaiser Permanente Santa Rosa Hospital providing meals to Kaiser members with congestive heart failure to see if we can reduce 30-day readmission rates. And we are doing a small pilot with low-income Latinx families who are at high risk of a heart attack or stroke. That pilot involves weekly nutrition education, medically tailored prepared meals, and healthy groceries, and is also looking to measure impacts on utilization and costs.
To address the epidemic of nutrition-related chronic disease, we have to expand access to healthy, affordable food to those in our communities who are most vulnerable. Proving the food is medicine concept—and being able to measure potential cost savings to health care, whether public or private—is a key strategy for doing this. We’re proud to be leaders in this work in California and across the country.
Along with what I’ve mentioned above, we are working with CCOF to develop a policy platform and support for expanding organic agriculture in California. We’ll also be presenting a workshop at The Root Cause Coalition Conference on the importance of establishing food quality standards for food as medicine interventions that include an environmental health lens.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethical Approval
Not applicable, because this article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
Informed Consent
Not applicable, because this article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
Trial Registration
Not applicable, because this article does not contain any clinical trials.
