This review discusses evidence-based perspectives on tailored health communications for lifestyle modification. Future directions for inquiry and practice also are addressed.
Beacom A., Newman S.Communicating health information to disadvantaged populations. Fam Community Health. 2010;33:152-162.
2.
Evans W.What social marketing can do for you. BMJ. 2006;332:1207-1210.
3.
Haerens L., Deforche B., Maes L., et al. A computer-tailored dietary fat intake intervention for adolescents: results of a randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med. 2007;34:253-262.
4.
Kreps G., Maibach E.Transdisciplinary science: the nexus between communication and public health . J Commun. 2008;58:732-748.
5.
Kreps G., Sparks L.Meeting the health literacy needs of immigrant populations. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;71:328-332.
6.
Kreuter M., Wray R.Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav. 2003;27(suppl 3):S227-S232.
7.
Kroeze W., Oenema A., Dagnelie P., et al. Examining the minimal required elements of a controlled dismantling study. Health Educ Res. 2008;23:880-891.
8.
Myung S., McDonnell D., Kazinets G., et al. Effects of web- and computer-based smoking cessation programs . JAMA. 2009;169:929-937.
9.
Noar S., Benac C., Harris M.Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull. 2007;133:673-693.
10.
Noar S., Harrington N., VanStee S., et al. Tailored health communication to change lifestyle behaviors . Am J Lifestyle Med. 2010;5:In Press.
11.
Park E., McDaniel A., Jung M.Computerized tailoring of health information. Comput Inform Nurs. 2009;27:34-43.
12.
Prestwich A. , Perugini M., Hurling R.Can implementation intentions and text messages promote brisk walking? A randomized trial. Health Psychol . 2010;29:40-49.
13.
Suggs L., McIntyre C.Are we there yet? An examination of online tailored health communication. Health Educ Behav. 2009;36:278-288.
14.
Williams G. , Lynch M., Glasgow R.Computer-assisted intervention improves patient-centered diabetes care by increasing autonomy support. Health Psychol . 2007;26:728-734.
15.
Yap T., Davis L.Physical activity: the science of health promotion through tailored messages . Rehabil Nurs. 2008;33:55-62.
16.
Yap T., Davis S., Gates D., et al. The effect of tailored e-mails in the workplace: Part I. Stage movement toward increased physical activity levels. AAOHN Journal2009; 57: 267-273.
17.
Yap T., Davis S., Gates D., et al. The effect of tailored e-mails in the workplace: Part II. Increasing overall physical activity. AAOHN J. 2009;57:313-319.
18.
Orbell S., Verplanken B.The automatic component of habit in health behavior: habit as cue-contingent automaticity. Health Psychol. 2010;29:374-383.
19.
Papies E., Hamstra P.Goal priming and eating behavior: enhancing self-regulation by environmental cues. Health Psychol. 2010;29:384-388.
20.
Shen L., Monahan J., Rhodes N., et al. The impact of attitude accessibility and decision style on adolescents’ biased processing of health-related public service announcements. Communic Res. 2009;36:104-128.
21.
Terre L.Communicating cancer risk reduction. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2009;3:362-364.
22.
Webb T., Sheeran P.Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychol Bull. 2006;132:249-268.
23.
Nederkoorn C., Houben K., Hofmann W., et al. Control yourself or just eat what you like? Weight gain over a year is predicted by an interactive effect of response inhibition and implicit preference for snack foods. Health Psychol. 2010;29:389-393.
24.
Terre L.Weight control in a land of milk and honey. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2007;1:447-450.
25.
Haug S., Meyer C., Ulbricht S., et al. Need for cognition as a predictor and moderator of outcome in a tailored letters smoking cessation intervention. Health Psychol. 2010;29:367-373.
26.
Schokker M. , Keers J., Bouma J., et al. The impact of social comparison information on motivation in patients with diabetes as a function of regulatory focus and self-efficacy. Health Psychol. 2010;29:438-445.
27.
Tam L., Bagozzi R., Spanjol J.When planning is not enough: the self-regulatory effect of implementation intentions on changing snacking habits. Health Psychol. 2010;29:284-292.
28.
Williams-Piehota P., Latimer A., Katulak N., et al. Tailoring messages to individual differences in monitoring-blunting styles to increase fruit and vegetable intake. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009;41:398-405.
29.
Businelle M., Kendzor D., Reitzel L., et al. Mechanisms linking socioeconomic status to smoking cessation: a structural equation modeling approach. Health Psychol. 2010;29:262-273.
30.
Carey K., Henson J., Carey M., et al. Perceived norms mediated effects of a brief motivational intervention for sanctioned college drinkers. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2010;17:58-71.
31.
Neuhauser L. , Kreps G.Online cancer communication: meeting the literacy, cultural and linguistic needs of diverse audiences. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;71:365-377.
32.
Neuhauser L. , Sparks L., Villagran M., et al. The power of community-based health communication interventions to promote cancer prevention and control for at-risk populations. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;71:315-318.
33.
Shire N.Effects of race, ethnicity, gender, culture, literacy, and social marketing on public health. J Gend Specif Med. 2002;5:48-54.
34.
Sparks L., Nussbaum J.Health literacy and cancer communication with older adults. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;71:345-350.
35.
Mikels J., Lockenhoff C., Maglio S., et al. Following your heart or your head: focusing on emotions versus information differently influences the decisions of younger and older adults . J Exp Psychol Appl. 2010;16:87-95.
36.
Falk E.Communication neuroscience as a tool for health psychologists. Health Psychol. 2010;29:355-357.
37.
Kessels L., Ruiter R., Jansma B.Increased attention but more efficient disengagement: neuroscientific evidence for defensive processing of threatening health information. Health Psychol. 2010;29:346-354.
38.
Chua H., Liberzon I., Welsh R., et al. Neural correlates of message tailoring and selfrelatedness in smoking cessation programming. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;65:165-168.
39.
Holt C., Lee C., Wright K.A spiritually based approach to breast cancer awareness: cognitive response analysis of communication effectiveness. Health Commun. 2008;23:13-22.
40.
King A., Friedman R., Marcus B., et al. Ongoing physical activity advice by humans versus computers: the Community Health Advice by Telephone (CHAT) trial. Health Psychol. 2007;26:718-727.
41.
Ryan G., Skinner C., Farrell D., et al. Examining the boundaries of tailoring: the utility of tailoring versus targeting mammography interventions for two distinct populations. Health Educ Res. 2001;16:555-566.
42.
Thompson V. , Cavazos-Rehg P., Jupka K., et al. Evidential preferences: cultural appropriateness strategies in health communications. Health Educ Res. 2008;23:549-559.
43.
Barg F., Grier S.Enhancing breast communications: a cultural models approach. Int J Res Mark. 2008;25:335-342.
44.
Holland J., Gentry J.Ethnic consumer reaction to targeted marketing: a theory of intercultural accommodation. J Advert. 1999;28:65-77.
45.
Kates S., Shaw-Garlock G.The ever entangling web: a study of ideologies and discourses in advertising to women. J Advert. 1999;28:33-49.
46.
Sieverding M., Matterne U., Ciccarello L.What role do social norms play in the context of men’s cancer screening intention and behavior? Application of an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior. Health Psychol. 2010;29:72-81.
