Abstract
Background:
Flexor tendon injuries remain a challenge for hand surgeons. The constraints of the pulley system with the need for a strong repair require a delicate balance. Suture repair has been the gold standard. The 4-strand locked cruciate stitch is the technique of choice for many. This can be laborious and technically difficult. Tendon stapler devices (TSDs) aim to provide fast, strong, low-profile repairs. Industry data have shown stronger TSD repairs compared with suture repair techniques. We aim to further explore the relative strengths of TSD and 4-strand locked cruciate repairs in cadavers.
Methods:
Twenty-four flexor tendons were used for 12 suture repairs and 12 TSD repairs. Four-strand locked cruciate repairs used 3-0 braided composite suture. The TSD repairs used CoNextions devices. Specimens were analyzed on a uniaxial load frame and distracted at 0.5 mm/s. Tension was recorded at 100 Hz. A camera system measured reference point positions at 10 Hz. Maximum tension and tension at 2-mm gap formation were recorded. Independent t-tests were used to compare groups, with significance noted by P < .05.
Results:
Load to failure for the staple group and suture group were 70.6 ± 20.5 N and 49.9 ± 14.1 N, respectively. Load to 2-mm gap for the staple group and the suture group were 57.5 ± 21.1 N and 38.6 ± 13.7 N, respectively. Mean load to failure and load to 2-mm gap were significantly greater in the TSD group.
Conclusions:
In this study, TSD repairs were stronger than the 4-strand locked cruciate suture repair. Further clinical studies and cost analyses are necessary to support their widespread use.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.