Abstract
Background:
Carpal tunnel syndrome is common, and carpal tunnel syndrome-6 (CTS-6) is a validated diagnostic tool; however, its weighted scoring limits rapid use. We evaluated a simplified quick carpal tunnel syndrome-6 (QCTS-6) for diagnostic accuracy.
Methods:
Carpal tunnel releases performed at a tertiary care center (January 2017-August 2024) were retrospectively identified. Preoperative presence or absence of the components of the CTS-6 were reviewed and assigned the corresponding number of points. For the QCTS-6 scoring system, 0 or 1 point was assigned for a total score out of 6. Preoperative electromyography (EMG)/nerve conduction study (NCS) results were collected when available. Descriptive statistics, Spearman’s Rho correlations, and diagnostic ratio tests were performed.
Results:
A total of 1143 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was a strong positive relationship between the CTS-6 and QCTS-6 scores for the overall cohort (r = 0.976). Patients with QCTS-6 score of 3 or more exhibited the presence of all questionnaire components and severe EMG/NCS findings at higher rates, with 98.2% of them having CTS-6 scores greater than 12. Diagnostic ratio testing identified numbness in the median nerve territory, nocturnal numbness, and loss of 2-point discrimination as the most balanced predictive factors.
Conclusions:
The QCTS-6 scoring system can be a valid alternative to the traditional CTS-6. Owing to its uniform scoring, it can allow for efficient workup without necessitating EMG/NCS. A score of 3 or more may serve as a sensitive cutoff for carpal tunnel syndrome.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
