Abstract
Background:
Upper limb orthopedic surgery has no standardized complication classification system. The adaptations in the Clavien-Dindo classification system have only been validated through the creation of scenarios. We hypothesized that the modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink (CDS) classification of hand and upper extremity surgery complications has good intraobserver and interobserver reliability in real-world scenarios. This study assessed the accuracy of the modified CDS classification in real-world scenarios and the absolute incidence of 30-day complications.
Methods:
The sample size calculation was based on the modified CDS classification. A kappa value of 0.84, accompanied by a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.1 and involving 6 observers, indicated the inclusion of 111 events. To achieve the anticipated sample size of 111 complications, 1850 postoperative procedures will be necessary, given the expected 6% incidence of complications. Six evaluators, each with varying levels of expertise in the field, classified the cases according to the modified CDS classification in 2 rounds.
Results:
The incidence of early complications was 7.05% (95% CI = 6%-8%) in a tertiary care university hospital. Intraobserver agreement was moderate to almost perfect; however, interobserver agreement was moderate. The less experienced surgeons presented a better interobserver correlation than the more experienced ones.
Conclusions:
In a real-world scenario of early postoperative complications of upper extremity surgery, the modified CDS classification presented a lower interobserver correlation than reported in the literature. The surgeon’s experience could influence its applicability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
