Managing Major Peripheral Nerves in Forearm-Level Amputations With TMR and RPNI: What’s the Best Recipe?

Abstract

Background:

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) prevent symptomatic neuroma formation in amputees. Forearm-level amputations present multiple muscular targets, making it challenging to determine the ideal treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the best TMR targets, role of RPNI, and appropriate patient-selection criteria in forearm-level amputations. We hypothesized that deep and distal TMR targets would best prevent symptomatic neuromas, RPNI would prove a success adjunct, and patients with poorly controlled diabetes would not develop symptomatic neuromas regardless of nerve management.

Methods:

We retrospectively identified forearm-level amputations performed between 2017 and 2022. Patients with TMR by outside providers, follow-up <6 months, or insufficient documentation were excluded. Demographics, surgical nerve management, and postoperative complications were collected. The primary outcome was development of a painful neuroma determined by the Eberlin criteria. Patients undergoing TMR were divided a priori into two groups, superficial and proximal versus deep and distal TMR targets, and were compared.

Results:

Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria, and 16 developed a symptomatic neuroma. No patients with a deep or distal TMR target developed a symptomatic neuroma. One nerve out of 12 treated with RPNI developed a symptomatic neuroma. No patient with poorly controlled diabetes developed a symptomatic neuroma, despite no advanced nerve management.

Conclusions:

In a case series of forearm amputations, deep and distal TMR targets prevented symptomatic neuroma formation more than superficial and proximal targets. Regenerative peripheral nerve interface is a useful adjunct for neuroma control, especially for the radial sensory nerve. Patients with poorly controlled diabetes may not require advanced nerve management.

Level of Evidence:

Level IV retrospective case series