Effect of Capitolunate Positioning on Outcomes in Scaphoid Excision and 4-Bone Fusion Patients

Abstract

Background:

Scaphoid excision and 4-bone fusion (4BF) is a surgical procedure to treat scapholunate advanced collapse. Some surgeons align the lunate over the capitates, whereas others leave the capitate in its uncovered native position. The capitolunate angle may affect long-term outcomes. This study examined whether postsurgical outcomes differed based on these differences in positioning.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis was performed for patients that underwent a 4BF between 2006 and 2020. Wrist range of motion; pain (0-10); and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores were recorded. The width of the capitate, the width of the lunate contacting the capitate, and the capitolunate angle were measured. Pearson correlations and t tests were performed. For t tests of capitolunate uncovering, patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with 0% capitate uncovering and patients with >0% uncovering. For capitolunate angle, the 2 groups were patients with a capitolunate angle of ≤10° and patients with a capitolunate angle of >10°.

Results:

There was a significant correlation between capitate coverage and wrist extension, but no correlation for flexion, pain, or DASH scores. Group 1 (0% uncovering) had increased wrist extension and decreased pain compared with group 2 (>0% uncovering). There were no significant correlations or differences in the analyses of capitolunate angle’s impact on outcomes.

Conclusions:

In patients undergoing 4BF, those who had the lunate aligned to completely cover the capitate head had improved wrist extension and pain compared with patients where the capitate head was left partially uncovered. Capitolunate angle was not predictive of postsurgical outcomes.