Functional Outcomes After a Physiotherapy Program in Elderly Patients With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I After Distal Radius Fracture: A Prospective Observational Study

Abstract

Background:

No published prospective studies have reported the clinical effects of physiotherapy at 1-year follow-up in patients with complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) after distal radius fracture (DRF). The purpose of this study was to evaluate at 1-year follow-up the functional effects of physiotherapy program in elderly patients with CRPS I after extra-articular DRF.

Methods:

A total of 72 patients with CRPS I after DRF were prospectively recruited. All patients were treated with a 6-week supervised physiotherapy treatment. Three evaluations were performed: at the beginning, at the end of the treatment, and at 1-year follow-up. Wrist function, upper limb function, grip strength, and pain intensity were assessed with the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Jamar dynamometer, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), respectively.

Results:

At 1-year follow-up, the PRWE showed a decrease of 21.6 points (Cohen’s d = 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 18.6-24.6; P < .05); the DASH showed a decrease of 23.8 points (Cohen’s d = 2.9; 95% CI = 20.8-26.7; P < .05); grip strength showed an increase of 40.6% (Cohen’s d = 5.0; 95% CI = 43.5-37.6; P < .05); and the VAS showed a decrease of 2.6 cm (Cohen’s d = 1.9; 95% CI = 2.11-3.16; P < .05).

Conclusion:

At 1-year follow-up, a physiotherapy program showed clinically and statistically significant results in all functional outcomes in elderly patients with CRPS I after extra-articular DRF.

Keywords

complex regional pain syndrome distal radius fracture functional outcomes physiotherapy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Singer

McLauchlan

Robinson

, et al. Epidemiology of fractures in 15,000 adults: the influence of age and gender. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(2):243-248.

Huetteman

Shauver

Malay

, et al. Variation in the treatment of distal radius fractures in the United States: 2010 to 2015. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(1):159-167.

Turner

Faber

Athwal

GS.

Complications of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin. 2010;26(1):85-96.

de Mos

Sturkenboom

Huygen

FJ.

Current understandings on complex regional pain syndrome. Pain Pract. 2009;9(2):86-99.

Bruehl

An update on the pathophysiology of complex regional pain syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2010;113(3):713-725.

Perez

Zollinger

Dijkstra

, et al. Evidence based guidelines for complex regional pain syndrome type 1. BMC Neurol. 2010;10:20.

Harden

Oaklander

Burton

, et al. Complex regional pain syndrome: practical diagnostic and treatment guidelines, 4th edition. Pain Med. 2013;14(2):180-229.

Daly

Bialocerkowski

AE.

Does evidence support physiotherapy management of adult Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type One? A systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2009;13(4):339-353.

Smart

Wand

O’Connell

NE.

Physiotherapy for pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2:CD010853.

10.

Alemdaroğlu

Iltar

Aydoğan

, et al. Three-point index in predicting redisplacement of extra-articular distal radial fractures in adults. Injury. 2010;41(2):197-203.

11.

Harden

Bruehl

Perez

RSGM

, et al. Validation of proposed diagnostic criteria (the “Budapest Criteria”) for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Pain. 2010;150(2):268-274.

12.

Gutiérrez-Espinoza

Rubio-Oyarzún

Olguín-Huerta

, et al. Supervised physical therapy vs home exercise program for patients with distal radius fracture: a single-blind randomized clinical study. J Hand Ther. 2017;30(3):242-252.

13.

Gutiérrez-Espinoza

Tabach-Apraiz

Oyanadel-Maldonado

Physical therapy in patients with complex regional pain syndrome type I after distal radius fracture: a case series. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019;31(4):403-407.

14.

MacDermid

JC.

Development of a scale for patient rating of wrist pain and disability. J Hand Ther. 1996;9(2):178-183.

15.

Alfie

Gallucci

Boretto

, et al. Patient-rated wrist evaluation: Spanish version and evaluation of its psychometric properties in patients with acute distal radius fracture. J Wrist Surg. 2017;6(3):216-219.

16.

Walenkamp

de Muinck Keizer

Goslings

, et al. The minimum clinically important difference of the patient-rated wrist evaluation score for patients with distal radius fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(10):3235-3241.

17.

Hudak

Amadio

Bombardier

Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602-608.

18.

Hervás

Navarro Collado

Peiró

, et al. Spanish version of the DASH questionnaire. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and responsiveness. Med Clin. 2006;127(12):441-447.

19.

Franchignoni

Vercelli

Giordano

, et al. Minimal clinically important difference of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(1):30-39.

20.

Richards

Palmiter-Thomas

Grip strength measurement: a critical review of tools, methods, and clinical utility. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med. 1996;8(1-2):87-109.

21.

Crosby

Wehbé

Mawr

Hand strength: normative values. J Hand Surg Am. 1994;19(4):665-670.

22.

Roberts

Denison

Martin

, et al. A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing. 2011;40(4):423-429.

23.

McCormack

Horne

Sheather

Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med. 1988;18(4):1007-1019.

24.

Tashjian

Deloach

Porucznik

, et al. Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(6):927-932. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.021.

25.

Jellad

Salah

Ben Salah Frih

Complex regional pain syndrome type I: incidence and risk factors in patients with fracture of the distal radius. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(3):487-492.

26.

Barker

Talevski

Morello

, et al. Effectiveness of aquatic exercise for musculoskeletal conditions: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(9):1776-1786.

27.

Coyle

Robertson

VJ.

Comparison of two passive mobilizing techniques following Colles’ fracture: a multi-element design. Man Ther. 1998;3(1):34-41.

28.

Valdes

Naughton

Algar

Sensorimotor interventions and assessments for the hand and wrist: a scoping review. J Hand Ther. 2014;27(4):272-285.

29.

Moseley

Flor

Targeting cortical representations in the treatment of chronic pain: a review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(6):646-652.

30.

Miettinen

Kautiainen

Mäntyselkä

, et al. Pain interference type and level guide the assessment process in chronic pain: categorizing pain patients entering tertiary pain treatment with the Brief Pain Inventory. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8):e0221437.

31.

Moseley

GL.

Graded motor imagery is effective for long-standing complex regional pain syndrome: a randomised controlled trial. Pain. 2004;108(1-2):192-198.

32.

Moseley

GL.

Is successful rehabilitation of complex regional pain syndrome due to sustained attention to the affected limb? A randomised clinical trial. Pain. 2005;114(1-2):54-61.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

2.86 MB