Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

In treating occupational hand injuries under workers’ compensation, the 2 most important goals are to maximize patient function, ideally to preinjury levels, and permit a timely return to work (RTW). The purpose of this study was to determine factors affecting total case length, that is, the total time from injury until primary closure of a patient’s claim, and disposition among patients with hand injuries treated under workers’ compensation.

Methods:

All cases treated under workers’ compensation by a single fellowship-trained hand surgeon within a single year were retrospectively reviewed. A case is defined as the entire management and treatment of a single patient related to a single occupational injury incident. Independent variables included age, sex, body mass index, comorbidity, occupation, injury pattern, and treatment modality. Dependent variables included treatment duration from injury to case closure and final case disposition (RTW, functional capacity evaluation [FCE], or loss to follow-up [LTFU]). Comparison between groups was accomplished with analysis of variance. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analysis was performed to predict case length and disposition.

Results:

In all, 447 cases involving a workers’ compensation claim were reviewed. Among these, 75 (16.8%) were LTFU, 24 (5.4%) required an FCE, and 346 (77.4%) an RTW. The RTW cases averaged 138.5 days, whereas those requiring FCE averaged 331.5 days. Compared with average case length, crush injuries (76.8 days. P < .001) and fractures (111.8 days, P = .0224) had significantly shorter time to closure. In a multivariate linear model, cases of soft tissue and nerve injury were associated with longer case lengths, remaining open for an additional 56.8 and 347.1 days, respectively (P < .001). Each treatment modality studied, therapy, injections, and surgery, was associated with an increase in case length.

Conclusions:

Cases requiring FCE were open significantly longer than those resulting in RTW. In addition, injury pattern and treatment modality were associated with significant variations in total case length. These results imply that a specific subset of patients, namely those with soft tissue and nerve injuries, may experience delayed resolution among patients treated under a workers’ compensation claim.

Keywords

fracture functional capacity evaluation return to work workers’ compensation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Leigh

. Economic burden of occupational injury and illness in the United States. Milbank Q. 2011;89(4):728-772.

Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses, 2017. BLS Economic News Release; 2018. bls.gov/news.release/archives/osh_11082018.pdf.

Sorock

Lombardi

Courtney

, et al. Epidemiology of occupational acute traumatic hand injuries: a literature review. Saf Sci. 2001;38(3):241-256.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surveillance for nonfatal occupational injuries treated in hospital emergency departments—United States, 1996. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998;47(15):302-306.

De Moraes

Godin

Tamaoki

, et al. Workers’ compensation status: does it affect orthopaedic surgery outcomes? a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12):e50251.

Skov

Jeune

Lauritsen

, et al. Time off work after occupational hand injuries. J Hand Surg Br. 1999;24(2):187-189.

Wong

. Time off work in hand injury patients. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(5):718-725.

State of Nevada Department of Business and Industry Workers’ Compensation Section. Employee Guide Workers’ Compensation. https://dir.nv.gov.2016.

State of Nevada Department of Business and Industry Workers’ Compensation Section. Employer Guide Workers’ Compensation. https://dir.nv.gov.2019.

10.

State of Nevada Department of Business and Industry. Claim Reopening. http://naiw.nv.gov/Reopening/Claim_Reopening/. Published 2019. Accessed May 27, 2019.

11.

Cheadle

Franklin

Wolfhagen

, et al. Factors influencing the duration of work-related disability: a population-based study of Washington State workers’ compensation. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(2):190-196.

12.

Jiang

Liang

, et al. Predictors of return to work and duration of absence following work-related hand injury. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2014;21(3):216-223.

13.

Lee

Chang

Shieh

, et al. Association between the initial anatomical severity and opportunity of return to work in occupational hand injured patients. J Trauma. 2010;69(6):E88-E93.

14.

Matsuzaki

Narisawa

Miwa

, et al. Predicting functional recovery and return to work after mutilating hand injuries: usefulness of Campbell’s Hand Injury Severity Score. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34(5):880-885.

15.

Shi

Sinden

MacDermid

, et al. A systematic review of prognostic factors for return to work following work-related traumatic hand injury. J Hand Ther. 2014;27(1):55-62; quiz 62.

16.

Roesler

Glendon

O’Callaghan

. Recovering from traumatic occupational hand injury following surgery: a biopsychosocial perspective. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(4):536-546.

17.

Chen

Lin

, et al. Self-perceived health and return to work following work-related hand injury. Occup Med (Lond). 2012;62(4):295-297.

18.

Dance

DeBerard

Gundy Cuneo

. Pain acceptance potentially mediates the relationship between pain catastrophizing and post-surgery outcomes among compensated lumbar fusion patients. J Pain Res. 2017;10:65-72.

19.

Wideman

Sullivan

. Differential predictors of the long-term levels of pain intensity, work disability, healthcare use, and medication use in a sample of workers’ compensation claimants. Pain. 2011;152(2):376-383.

20.

Wijnhoven

de Vet

Picavet

. Sex differences in consequences of musculoskeletal pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(12):1360-1367.

21.

Marom

Ratzon

Carel

, et al. Return-to-work barriers among manual workers after hand injuries: 1-year follow-up cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(3):422-432.

22.

Davidhizar

. The pursuit of illness for secondary gain. Health Care Superv. 1994;13(1):10-15.

23.

Cabral

Sampaio

Figueiredo

, et al. Factors associated with return to work following a hand injury: a qualitative/quantitative approach. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2010;14(2):149-157.

24.

Chang

Lee

, et al. Correlation of return to work outcomes and hand impairment measures among workers with traumatic hand injury. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(1):9-16.

25.

Fujihara

Shauver

Lark

, et al. The effect of workers’ compensation on outcome measurement methods after upper extremity surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(4):923-933.

26.

Tejwani

Takemoto

Nayak

, et al. Who is lost to followup? a study of patients with distal radius fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(2):599-604.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.14 MB

0.01 MB

Effects of Injury Pattern and Treatment on Case Length and Disposition for Hand Injuries Treated Under a Workers’ Compensation Claim