Background: Therapeutic electrical stimulation (ES) applied to repaired nerve is a promising treatment option to improve regeneration. However, few studies address the impact of ES following nerve graft reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to determine if ES applied to a nerve repair using nerve isograft in a rodent model could improve nerve regeneration and functional recovery. Methods: Adult rats were randomized to 2 groups: “ES” and “Control.” Rats received a tibial nerve transection that was repaired using a tibial nerve isograft (1.0 cm length), where ES was applied immediately after repair in the applicable group. Nerve was harvested 2 weeks postrepair for immunohistochemical analysis of axon growth and macrophage accumulation. Independently, rats were assessed using walking track and grid-walk analysis for up to 21 weeks. Results: At 2 weeks, more robust axon regeneration and greater macrophage accumulation was observed within the isografts for the ES compared to Control groups. Both walking track and grid-walk analysis revealed that return of functional recovery was accelerated by ES. The ES group demonstrated improved functional recovery over time, as well as improved recovery compared to the Control group at 21 weeks. Conclusions: ES improved early axon regeneration into a nerve isograft and was associated with increased macrophage and beneficial M2 macrophage accumulation within the isograft. ES ultimately improved functional recovery compared to isograft repair alone. This study supports the clinical potential of ES to improve the management of nerve injuries requiring a nerve graft repair.
ChanKMCurranMWGordonT.The use of brief post-surgical low frequency electrical stimulation to enhance nerve regeneration in clinical practice. J Physiol. 2016;594(13):3553-3559.
6.
GordonTAmirjaniNEdwardsDC, et al. Brief post-surgical electrical stimulation accelerates axon regeneration and muscle reinnervation without affecting the functional measures in carpal tunnel syndrome patients. Exp Neurol. 2010;223(1):192-202.
7.
WongJNOlsonJLMorhartMJ, et al. Electrical stimulation enhances sensory recovery: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Neurol. 2015;77(6):996-1006.
8.
GordonT.Electrical stimulation to enhance axon regeneration after peripheral nerve injuries in animal models and humans. Neurotherapeutics. 2016;13(2):295-310.
9.
Al-MajedAANeumannCMBrushartTM, et al. Brief electrical stimulation promotes the speed and accuracy of motor axonal regeneration. J Neurosci. 2000;20(7):2602-2608.
10.
BrushartTMHoffmanPNRoyallRM, et al. Electrical stimulation promotes motoneuron regeneration without increasing its speed or conditioning the neuron. J Neurosci. 2002;22(15):6631-6638.
11.
EnglishAWSchwartzGMeadorW, et al. Electrical stimulation promotes peripheral axon regeneration by enhanced neuronal neurotrophin signaling. Dev Neurobiol. 2007;67(2):158-172.
12.
GordonTUdinaEVergeVM, et al. Brief electrical stimulation accelerates axon regeneration in the peripheral nervous system and promotes sensory axon regeneration in the central nervous system. Motor Control. 2009;13(4):412-441.
13.
MackinnonSE.Surgical management of the peripheral nerve gap. Clin Plast Surg. 1989;16(3):587-603.
14.
ZuoKJShafaGAntonyshynK, et al. A single session of brief electrical stimulation enhances axon regeneration through nerve autografts. Exp Neurol. 2020;323:113074.
15.
Al-MajedAABrushartTMGordonT.Electrical stimulation accelerates and increases expression of BDNF and trkB mRNA in regenerating rat femoral motoneurons. Eur J Neurosci. 2000;12(12):4381-4390.
16.
HareGMEvansPJMackinnonSE, et al. Walking track analysis: a long-term assessment of peripheral nerve recovery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89(2):251-258.
17.
LadakASchembriPOlsonJ, et al. Side-to-side nerve grafts sustain chronically denervated peripheral nerve pathways during axon regeneration and result in improved functional reinnervation. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(6):1654-1665; discussion 1665-1666.
18.
HendryJMAlvarez-VeronesiMCSnyder-WarwickA, et al. Side-to-side nerve bridges support donor axon regeneration into chronically denervated nerves and are associated with characteristic changes in Schwann cell phenotype. Neurosurgery. 2015;77(5):803-813.
19.
JoSPanDHaleviAE, et al. Comparing electrical stimulation and tacrolimus (FK506) to enhance treating nerve injuries. Muscle Nerve. 2019;60(5):629-636.
20.
BainJRMackinnonSEHunterDA.Functional evaluation of complete sciatic, peroneal, and posterior tibial nerve lesions in the rat. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83(1):129-138.
21.
HunterDAMoradzadehAWhitlockEL, et al. Binary imaging analysis for comprehensive quantitative histomorphometry of peripheral nerve. J Neurosci Methods. 2007;166(1):116-124.
22.
HunterDAPanDWoodMD, et al. Design-based stereology and binary image histomorphometry in nerve assessment. J Neurosci Methods. 2020;336:108635.
23.
McLeanNAVergeVM.Dynamic impact of brief electrical nerve stimulation on the neural immune axis-polarization of macrophages toward a pro-repair phenotype in demyelinated peripheral nerve. Glia. 2016;64(9):1546-1561.
24.
OliveiraKMCBarkerJHBerezikovE, et al. Electrical stimulation shifts healing/scarring towards regeneration in a rat limb amputation model. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):11433.
25.
CattinALBurdenJJVan EmmenisL, et al. Macrophage-induced blood vessels guide Schwann cell-mediated regeneration of peripheral nerves. Cell. 2015;162(5):1127-1139.
26.
PanDMackinnonSEWoodMD.Advances in the repair of segmental nerve injuries and trends in reconstruction. Muscle Nerve. 2019;61:726-739.
27.
StrattonJAHolmesARosinNL, et al. Macrophages regulate Schwann cell maturation after nerve injury. Cell Rep. 2018;24(10):2561-2572.e6.
BrennerMJMoradzadehAMyckatynTM, et al. Role of timing in assessment of nerve regeneration. Microsurgery. 2008;28(4):265-272.
30.
MackinnonSEHudsonARHunterDA.Histologic assessment of nerve regeneration in the rat. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;75(3):384-388.
31.
VannucciBSantosaKBKeaneAM, et al. What is normal? Neuromuscular junction reinnervation after nerve injury. Muscle Nerve. 2019;60(5):604-612.
32.
SantosaKBKeaneAMJablonka-ShariffA, et al. Clinical relevance of terminal Schwann cells: an overlooked component of the neuromuscular junction. J Neurosci Res. 2018;96(7):1125-1135.
