Background: There is limited literature regarding the treatment of concomitant scapholunate ligament (SL) injuries in acute distal radius fractures (DRFs). We hypothesized that surgical treatment of SL injuries in adult patients with DRFs leads to improved functional outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review was made of 42 adult patients who underwent surgical treatment of a DRF with a SL injury between 2005 and 2013. In all, 39 of the 42 patients sustained an intra-articular DRF (AO B or C). SL injury was diagnosed by SL diastasis > 3 mm on posteroanterior (PA) radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, or with wrist arthroscopy. Patients were divided into 3 groups: 23 had a SL repair and were treated within 21 days of injury (acute), 8 underwent SL repair greater than 21 days from injury (subacute/chronic), and 11 did not undergo repair (non-operative). Median overall time to clinical follow-up was 5.1 years. Mayo Wrist Scores (MWS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores were used to evaluate functional outcome. Results: Clinical outcomes measured by the MWS at final follow-up (6 months-12 years) showed no significant differences between the 3 groups. Of patients treated acutely, 17.3% had good to excellent MWS. MWS at 1-year follow-up was 68.4, 70, and 64 in the acute, subacute/chronic, and non-operative groups, respectively. DASH scores were 16.7, 14.3, and 11.8 in the acute, subacute/chronic, and nonoperative groups, respectively, at a mean of 7.8 years. Conclusions: At mid-term follow-up, all 3 treatment groups had similar DASH scores to the general population. There were no statistical functional differences between any of the groups based upon MWS or DASH scores.
ForwardDPLindauTRMelsomDS.Intercarpal ligament injuries associated with fractures of the distal part of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2334-2340.
2.
GeisslerWBFreelandAESavoieFH, et al. Intracarpal soft-tissue lesions associated with an intra-articular fracture of the distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(3):357-365. doi:10.2106/00004623-199603000-00006.
3.
WhiteNJRollickNC.Injuries of the scapholunate interosseous ligament: an update. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23:691-703.
4.
PappouIPBaselJDealDN.Scapholunate ligament injuries: a review of current concepts. Hand (N Y). 2013;8(2):146-156. doi:10.1007/s11552-013-9499-4.
5.
MoranSLFordKSWulfCA, et al. Outcomes of dorsal capsulodesis and tenodesis for treatment of scapholunate instability. J Hand Surg Am. 2006;31(9):1438-1446. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.08.002.
6.
O’MeeghanCJStuartWMamoV, et al. The natural history of an untreated isolated scapholunate interosseus ligament injury. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;28(4):307-310. doi:10.1016/s0266-7681(03)00079-2.
7.
PichaBMKonstantakosEKGordonDA.Incidence of bilateral scapholunate dissociation in symptomatic and asymptomatic wrists. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(6):1130-1135. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.03.020.
8.
WrightTWDel CharcoMWheelerD.Incidence of ligament lesions and associated degenerative changes in the elderly wrist. J Hand Surg Am. 1994;19(2):313-318. doi:10.1016/0363-5023(94)90026-4.
9.
SwartETangP.The effect of ligament injuries on outcomes of operatively treated distal radius fractures. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017;46(1):E41-E46.
10.
YoshidaSYoshidaKSakaiK, et al. Frequency of scapholunate ligament injuries associated with distal radius shearing fracture: correlation of fracture patterns and ligament tear. Hand Surg. 2015;20(3):440-446. doi:10.1142/S0218810415500379.
11.
MrkonjicALindauTGeijerM, et al. Arthroscopically diagnosed scapholunate ligament injuries associated with distal radial fractures: a 13- to 15-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40:1077-1082.
12.
MoranSLCooneyWPBergerRA, et al. Capsulodesis for the treatment of chronic scapholunate instability. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30:16-23.
13.
LeeSKDesaiHSilverB, et al. Comparison of radiographic stress views for scapholunate dynamic instability in a cadaver model. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36:1149-1157.
14.
KuoCEWolfeSW.Scapholunate instability: current concepts in diagnosis and management. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:998-1013.
15.
RamkumarPNNavarroSMHaeberleHS, et al. No difference in outcomes 12 and 24 months after lower extremity total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(7):2322-2329. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.056.
16.
SamuelssonKMagnussenRAAlentorn-GeliE, et al. Equivalent knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome scores 12 and 24 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Swedish national knee ligament register. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(9):2085-2091. doi:10.1177/0363546517702871.
17.
CooneyWPBusseyRDobynsJH, et al. Difficult wrist fractures. Perilunate fracture-dislocations of the wrist. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;214:136-147.
18.
BirchANuttallDStanleyJK, et al. The outcome of wrist surgery: what factors are important and how should they be reported?J Hand Surg Eur. 2011;36:308-314.
19.
SorensenAAHowardDTanWH, et al. Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments.J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(4):641-649. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.12.032.
20.
SchmittJSDi FabioRP.Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:1008-1018.
21.
BeatonDEKatzJNFosselAH, et al. Measuring the whole or the parts? validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001;14:128-146.
22.
HunsakerFGCioffiDAAmadioPC, et al. The American academy of orthopaedic surgeons outcomes instruments: normative values from the general population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(2):208-215. doi:10.2106/00004623-200202000-00007.
23.
SouerJSLozano-CalderonSARingD.Predictors of wrist function and health status after operative treatment of fractures of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(2):157-163. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.10.003.
