AkinleyeSDGarofolo-GonzalezGMontuoriM, et al. Readability of the most commonly accessed online patient education materials pertaining to pathology of the hand. Hand. 2018;13(6):705-714.
2.
ClineRJHaynesKM.Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res. 2001;16(6):671-692. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11780707. Accessed December 19, 2018.
3.
KincaidJPFishburneRPRogersRD, et al. Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. http://stars.library.ucf.edu/istlibrary/56. Institute Simulation Training paper 56. Published January 1975. Accessed December 19, 2018.
4.
HaddenKPrinceLYSchnaekelA, et al. Readability of patient education materials in hand surgery and health literacy best practices for improvement. J Hand Surg Am. 2016;41(8):825-832.
5.
KüçükdurmazFGomezMMSecristE, et al. Reliability, readability and quality of online information about femoracetabular impingement. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2015;3(3):163-168. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26213699. Accessed December 19, 2018.
6.
CharnockDShepperdSNeedhamG, et al. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105-111. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10396471. Accessed December 19, 2018.